Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The VVAW Assassination Discussion - "A lot of people were convinced that this was the way to do it."
March 25, 2004 | Compiled

Posted on 03/24/2004 7:43:30 PM PST by Hon

Sometime during a national meeting of the Vietnam Veterans Against The War (VVAW) held November 12-14, 1971 there was an intense "discussion" and vote on a plan offered by Scott Camil to assassinate top Congressional leaders who had voted to continue funding the war in Vietnam.

There has been much discussion here and some in the media of this topic. The details are getting confused, and few people have seen any of the original source material.

I first came upon the subject in early February when I was looking for information about Kerry in "Winter Soldiers," by Richard Staciewicz. The following is an excerpt from pp 294-295:

In the fall of 1971, tensions over the direction in which the organization was heading, as it spread out into various community activities and took on a more consciously anti-imperialist position, were becoming more evident. In November, an emergency meeting of the steering committee was held in Kansas City. This meeting was a result of the growing friction among members of the steering committee, and between new members and the old leadership.

[snip]

[Terry DuBose] TDB: That was also where there was actually some discussion of assassinating some senators during the Christmas holidays. They were people who I knew from the organization with hotheaded rhetoric.

They had a list of six senators ... Helms, John Tower, and I can't remember the others, who they wanted to assassinate when they adjourned for Christmas. They were the ones voting to fund the war. They approached me about assassinating John Tower because he was from Texas. The logic made a certain amount of sense because there's thousands of people dying in southeast Asia. We can shoot these six people and probably stop it. Some of us were willing to sabotage materials, but when it came to people ... I mean, there were a lot of angry people...

Staciewicz went on to say that Kerry left or was removed from the steering committee of the VVAW after this meeting:

The meeting in Kansas City brought in a new steering committee. John Kerry, Craig Scott Moore, Mike Oliver, and Skip Roberts resigned from their leadership positions and were replaced by several new members. Al Hubbard and Joe Urgo remained in office and were joined by John Birch, Lenny Rotman, and Larry Rottman.

I then came across the plan againg in Gerald Nicosia's book, "Home To War," pp 221-223:

[Scott] Camil proposed VVAW return in force to Washington, D.C., and there apply pressure in every conceivable way to the legislators who were still voting to fund the war. After the assembly of coordinators defeated the plan, he was told it was “a closed issue at this point." Camil replied that such a tactic was "never a closed issue." He then made known an even more radical proposal, which he intended to submit to the coordinators for their approval. If undertaken, he claimed, it would guarantee the end of congressional support for the war. It was this proposal that nearly blew the Kansas City convention wide open, and which branded Camil as both dangerous and crazy for the remainder of his time in the organization.

What Camil sketched was so explosive that the coordinators feared lest government agents even hear of it. So they decamped to a church on the outskirts of town with the intention of debating the plan in complete privacy. When they got the church, however, they found that the government was already on to them; their "debugging expert" uncovered microphones hidden all over the place. An instantaneous decision was made to move again - to Common Ground, a Mennonite hall used by homeless vets as a "crash pad," on 77th Terrace. This time a vote was taken to exclude anyone but regional coordinators and members the national office. The rest of the members, even trusted leaders such as Randy Barnes and John Upton (who had earned their credibility in the mud and tears of Dewey Canvon III), were forced to wait outside on the grass, where messeng­ers brought frequent word of what was going on inside. According to Barnes, everybody knew that the discussion in that hall "was grounds for criminal indictment of conspiracy."

Discussion was not exactly the word for it. John Upton recalls it being "a knock-down-drag-out [fight] at times." Randy Barnes remembers "people standing up on the tables yelling and screaming at one another." The proposal that fired so much anger was called the "Phoenix plan," in mockery of the U.S. government's similar program in Vietnam. There was, in fact, good evidence that the United States Studies and Observation Group (SOG) - known to those inside it as the Special Operations Group - had used its own Special Forces, those of South Vietnam, and even South Vietnamese mercenaries to murder various Communist and Communist-sympathizing village chiefs, political leaders,­ and other influential citizens in South Vietnam. Some say as many as 10,000 were assassinated, in order (theoretically) to rebuild a more democratic infrastructure in the south. Hence the name "Phoenix": a better, stronger Vietnam was supposed to rise from the ashes of the Communist-tainted one. Similarly, Camil now proposed the assassination of the most hard-core conservative members of Congress, as well as any other powerful, intractable opponents of the antiwar movement - the ones who would rather die than see America suffer a military defeat in Vietnam. Fine, let them die, suggested Camil - in fact, help them along in that direction and once they were cleared out of the way, a truly democratic America could arise, one that would choose to be at peace with the rest of the world.

When the Phoenix plan first came before the steering committee meeting, John Upton had been standing almost next to Camil, and he recalls that "at first it was laughed off. Then he [Camil] became really irate, and some other people that were supporting that got really irate, and it got down to a really hard discussion about it. There was a time, I'm not kidding you, I was almost one of them. Especially when we moved over to 77th Terrace, a lot of people were convinced that this was the way to do it. I thought it was a novel idea, but it was not something I would support. I looked on it as doing just what we were fighting against. It was killing people for no [good] reason. I remember saying this, and somebodv stood up and called me a 'moderate'! If I went an inch more crazier than I was, I could have endorsed it one hundred percent. Scott was pissed off just like I was. He was one of those people I really identified with ­ with the anger I saw there. My whole instinct here was, `Let's demonstrate and do these things against the fucking war, to get the word out. Let's talk in high schools. But let's do things legal. Let's get the right permits.' The Phoenix plan was like, that's what needs to be done, but, God, we can't really do that."

Nicosia's book was confusing in that he had claimed that Kerry had quit the VVAW in July after a showdown with Al Hubbard. And yet even he then went on to talk about the change in leadership after the KC meeting.

We now know for a fact, thanks to the FBI surveillance files, that Kerry was in fact at this meeting--despite Kerry's many earilier denials to the contrary.

Also, it should be noted that despite Nicosia's claim that this proposal "branded Camil as both dangerous and crazy for the remainder of his time in the organization" -- in fact, Camil became one of the two top leaders in the VVAW from then on. And indeed, Camil had been a major force and a close ally of Kerry's before then.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; camil; darkplot; geraldnicosia; johnupton; kerry; kerry2004; kerryfbifiles; nicosia; phoenixproject; scottcamil; upton; vvaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Hon
[Terry DuBose] TDB: That was also where there was actually some discussion of assassinating some senators during the Christmas holidays. They were people who I knew from the organization with hotheaded rhetoric.

They had a list of six senators ... Helms, John Tower, and I can't remember the others, who they wanted to assassinate when they adjourned for Christmas. They were the ones voting to fund the war.

About Helms:

HELMS, Jesse, 1921-
Senate Years of Service: 1973-2003
Party: Republican

HELMS, Jesse, a Senator from North Carolina; born in Monroe, Union County, N.C., October 18, 1921; educated in the public schools of Monroe, Wingate Junior College, and Wake Forest College; served in the United States Navy 1942-1945; city editor, Raleigh Times; administrative assistant to United States Senators Willis Smith 1951-1953 and Alton Lennon 1953; executive director, North Carolina Bankers Association 1953-1960; television and radio executive 1960-1972; member, Raleigh City Council 1957-1961; elected as a Republican to the United States Senate in 1972 and reelected in 1978, 1984, 1990 and again in 1996, and served from January 3, 1973 to January 3, 2003; not a candidate for reelection in 2002; chair, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry (1981-87), Committee on Foreign Relations (1995-January 3, 2001; January 20, 2001-June 6, 2001).
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress
1774 to Present

Helms was a radio and TV exec in 1971.


21 posted on 03/24/2004 8:45:18 PM PST by Sabertooth (< /Kerry>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
"The fact that the meeting location was moved twice on short notice amid extreme security concerns makes Kerry's claims of forgetfulness even more incredible."

Kerry has a book party for Nicosia's book. He also wrote a very favorable review for it. The book was published in 2001.

You would have thought at the very least that this passage might have jogged his memory.

No, it's seems pretty clear that Kerry remembered it all too clearly. That's why he denied it the way he did. He tried a "limited hang-out" and it didn't work.

Even Nicosia, who is a major Kerry supporter, thinks that this is trouble for Kerry and that he needs to address it more openly.
22 posted on 03/24/2004 8:48:52 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hon; tpaine
Folks, TPaine is another one of the trolls who have joined a campaign to try to drive me from Free Republic. I didn't know he was an owner or even a moderator.

Oh I wouldn't worry to much about tpaine .. if we can put up with him .. he can put up with us .. or at least try to :0)

Besides .. It's Jim's site and if he thinks there is a problem .. he'll let you/us know about

23 posted on 03/24/2004 8:51:13 PM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tpaine




The fact remains, you have failed to make the point that any government agency took this seriously enough to consider it to be a criminal act.

So, you're trusting the government's judgement?


24 posted on 03/24/2004 8:53:32 PM PST by Sabertooth (< /Kerry>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
As I was saying:

Kerry Still Backpedaling on Presence at 1971 Anti-War Meetings
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
March 24, 2004

Gerald Nicosia, author of the book Home to War: A History of the Vietnam Veterans' Movement and a Kerry supporter, told CNSNews.com last week that Kerry was being less than truthful about his anti-war activities.

"I am having some problems with the things he is saying right now, which are not matching up with accuracy," Nicosia said.

"I am in kind of an awkward position here. I am a Kerry supporter and I certainly don't want to do anything that hurts him. On the other hand, my number one allegiance is to truth. So I am going to go with where the facts are, and John is going to have to deal with that," Nicosia said.

Kerry hosted a reception in Nicosia's honor in 2001 when the book was released and praised it as an "important new book [that] ties together the many threads of a difficult period in our history every American should take the time to understand in its totality."

More recently, Nicosia offered some advice for Kerry: "The chickens are coming home to roost, and unfortunately he is starting to backtrack and I personally don't think backtracking is going to work because people are going to go at him and find the discrepancies," Nicosia said.

http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200403\NAT20040324a.html

25 posted on 03/24/2004 8:54:05 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yes, as we've noted before, DuBose was mistaken in naming Helms. He might have been thinking of Stennis.

More likely he was just thinking about the upcoming years.
26 posted on 03/24/2004 8:55:38 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; tpaine
"The fact remains, you have failed to make the point that any government agency took this seriously enough to consider it to be a criminal act."

You've probably seen me make the opposite point several times, Sabertooth. On a thread just the other night I posted the US Code that would apply and I argued that it is probably unlikely that this event satisfied the critia for any kind of indictment since there is no record of any attempt to bring about the action.

In fact, you have been pursuing the line that there might have been some subsequent action that was perhaps fallout from this.

I don't mean to treat TP's post seriously, of course. I fully realize that he is just a troll. But it doesn't hurt to clarify the facts, since trolls live to confuse things.
27 posted on 03/24/2004 8:58:55 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Randy Barnes needs to get his stories straight. He's a Kerry supporter, and on The Big Story with John Gibson last night, he said that the Phoenix Project (he wouldn't say the word assassination), was the idea of only one guy and that everyone else ignored him because they didn't think he was serious. So why take a vote?
28 posted on 03/24/2004 9:03:41 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hon
^
29 posted on 03/24/2004 9:03:45 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (DEFUND PBS & NPR - THE AMERICAN PRAVDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"But really isn't it at least the tinest bit troubling when two major figures like Paul o'neil and clarke start saying things that corroborate eachother?"

More than likely. I saw him on Fox News being interviewed by John Gibson. It was really funny, because he wouldn't admit that the Phoenix Project the VVAW was considering, was the same as the assassination (Phoenix) project used in Vietnam. Gibson had to force him to admit to it. He bad-mouthed Libscomb badly. I think he's just ticked that the reporter has done such a good job of uncovering information.

30 posted on 03/24/2004 9:08:15 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hon; Sabertooth
So the "act in furtherance" of the conspiracy evidence was too weak to support a criminal indictment then, eh? Doesn't mean it can't be revealed now.....


31 posted on 03/24/2004 9:09:38 PM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is what I found and posted the other night on the subject of whether this would be subject to prosecution or not:

Kerry Friend Beau Dietl 'Shocked' by Assassination Plot ^
      Posted by Hon to Texasforever
On News/Activism ^ 03/21/2004 1:52:38 AM EST #73 of 125 ^

Yeah, if they had pulled it off, it looks like this would have kicked in:

18 USC Sec. 351
01/26/98

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 18 - CONGRESSIONAL, CABINET, AND SUPREME COURT ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPPING, AND ASSAULT

HEADING

Sec. 351. Congressional, Cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination, kidnapping, and assault; penalties

STATUTE

(a) Whoever kills any individual who is a Member of Congress or a Member-of-Congress-elect, a member of the executive branch of the Government who is the head, or a person nominated to be head during the pendency of such nomination, of a department listed in section 101 of title 5 or the second ranking official in such department, the Director (or a person nominated to be Director during the pendency of such nomination) or Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, a major Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate (as defined in section 3056 of this title), or a Justice of the United States, as defined in section 451 of title 28, or a person nominated to be a Justice of the United States, during the pendency of such nomination, shall be punished as provided by sections 1111 and 1112 of this title.

(b) Whoever kidnaps any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section shall be punished (1) by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or (2) by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, if death results to such individual.

(c) Whoever attempts to kill or kidnap any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

(d) If two or more persons conspire to kill or kidnap any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished (1) by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or (2) by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, if death results to such individual.

(e) Whoever assaults any person designated in subsection (a) of this section shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the assault involved the use of a dangerous weapon, or personal injury results, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(f) If Federal investigative or prosecutive jurisdiction is asserted for a violation of this section, such assertion shall suspend the exercise of jurisdiction by a State or local authority, under any applicable State or local law, until Federal action is terminated.

(g) Violations of this section shall be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistance may be requested from any Federal, State, or local agency, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, any statute, rule, or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding.

(h) In a prosecution for an offense under this section the Government need not prove that the defendant knew that the victim of the offense was an individual protected by this section.

(i) There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section.


Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies


Kerry Friend Beau Dietl 'Shocked' by Assassination Plot ^
      Posted by Hon to All
On News/Activism ^ 03/21/2004 1:55:15 AM EST #75 of 125 ^

"d) If two or more persons conspire to kill or kidnap any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished (1) by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or (2) by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, if death results to such individual."

This seems like the most relevant passage. And, mentioned by some earlier, since presumeably nobody acted upon this conspiracy, there will probably not be any prosecution.


Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies

Just so everyone knows that Tpaine is a fantasist (to put it mildly).
32 posted on 03/24/2004 9:10:06 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: mass55th
"was the idea of only one guy and that everyone else ignored him because they didn't think he was serious. So why take a vote?"

And why would Nicosia attribute this to him?

"According to Barnes, everybody knew that the discussion in that hall "was grounds for criminal indictment of conspiracy."

No, Barnes was one of the first to place Kerry at the meeting. He later backtracked after two calls from Kerry's henchman, John Hurley. But of course he was right the first time, as the FBI files prove.

And he is now doing his best to diminish the story, since he is on the Kerry payroll.

Camil wasn't considered a kook. He went on after the KC meeting to fill the void that Kerry (and Hubbard) had left. He became one of the two top leaders of the VVAW.

He wasn't considered a crank at all. As Nicosia said, his proposal made the VVAW respect him all the more.
35 posted on 03/24/2004 9:14:43 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hon
You've probably seen me make the opposite point several times, Sabertooth. On a thread just the other night I posted the US Code that would apply and I argued that it is probably unlikely that this event satisfied the critia for any kind of indictment since there is no record of any attempt to bring about the action.

My operating theory is that the double move in Kansas City succeeded in preventing the FBI from learning of the Phoenix Project. Too many participants have said the discussion was serious to dismiss their accounts.

Also, keep in mind that 1972, when the file on Kerry was apparently closed, was an election year. On top of that we have the death of J. Edgar Hoover and the Watergate break-in. Wouldn't be surprising if some things fell through the cracks around that time.

BTW, as you know, the fact that Kerry's FBI file appeared to clear both him and the VVAW of violent intent is actually damning, rather than exculpatory. Since we know the Phoenix Project meeting took place, and since we know Kerry was there, that clean spot in the file means that he never reported the plot to authorities.

In fact, you have been pursuing the line that there might have been some subsequent action that was perhaps fallout from this.

Yep. One of the named targets, John Stennis, was shot in January of 1973, three days after the cease fire between the U.S. and North Vietnam went into effect.

Since I don't recall the perps being captured, and can't verify it yet on the 'net, one has to wonder.


36 posted on 03/24/2004 9:17:06 PM PST by Sabertooth (< /Kerry>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I don't know how much longer I will be posting here if the moderators are going to allow the trolls to post outright libels about me with impugnity.

But just to respond to your poinst--remember we only have Kerry spokesflak David Wade's word about the FBI's file being closed on Kerry and saying what it did. At least I don't know anybody else who has seen the FBI files and who has put it the way he did.

AFAIK, Kerry was never much of a target for the FBI. It was always more a matter of going after the VVAW--which the FBI had been doing since 1967--under Johnson.

The FBI really had their hands full at the time. Again, AFAIK, they never tried to infiltrate the group until after the KC meeting. And maybe Camil's proposal was part of the reason why they did infiltrate it.

As you know, the FBI was able to stop Camil from violently disrupting the GOP convention, as he had planned to do. And maybe they stopped some other things that we don't know about. But Wade's remarks were far to generous insofar as he tried to absolve the VVAW.
37 posted on 03/24/2004 9:21:56 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
*But as a matter of fact, your own assertion might be open to question since Nicosia quoted the following from the FBI (which I believe is a government agency): On December 22, 1971, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover sent a classified memo to the director of the Jacksonville office, dealing specifically with Camil. It read in part: "Information developed to date regarding subject [Camil] indicates clearly subject is extremely dangerous and unstable individual whose activities must be neutralized at earliest possible time." Given that there was very little time for Camil do have done anything in the short time following the KC meeting, this FBI memo almost certainly indicates that they had gotten wind of this plot.

**And? -- What did Hoover do?

He up and died on May 2nd, 1972.

On June 17th, 1972, the FBI's attention was diverted to Watergate.


38 posted on 03/24/2004 9:22:51 PM PST by Sabertooth (< /Kerry>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Ya got me saber.. I confess..

My handlers in the great plot to discredit 'Hon' are in a panic. He's getting dangerously close to discovering who had the key to the wardroom refrigerator on Kerry's last ship.
39 posted on 03/24/2004 9:24:19 PM PST by tpaine (The arrogance of power demands that infinitely shrewd imbeciles lay down the law for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Hon
In fact, you have been pursuing the line that there might have been some subsequent action that was perhaps fallout from this.

------Yep. One of the named targets, John Stennis, was shot in January of 1973, three days after the cease fire between the U.S. and North Vietnam went into effect.

Since I don't recall the perps being captured, and can't verify it yet on the 'net, one has to wonder.--------------

I'm wondering enough to create my own sig, lame as they may be!


40 posted on 03/24/2004 9:28:17 PM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson