Skip to comments.
Who Needs Weapons? It's good we didn't listen to Kerry back in '84.
National Review ^
| March 22, 2004, 9:08 a.m.
| By Rep. J. D. Hayworth
Posted on 03/22/2004 6:46:54 AM PST by .cnI redruM
"We are continuing a defense buildup that is consuming our resources with weapons systems that we don't need and can't use." John Kerry in 1984 on the Reagan defense build-up.
What are some of these weapons systems that John Kerry said "we don't need and can't use?" The list might surprise you. It includes many of the most important weapons in our arsenal and weapons that have performed brilliantly in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Among the systems John Kerry said he wanted to cancel were the B-1 bomber, the Apache helicopter, the Patriot anti-missile system, the Aegis cruiser, the AV-8B Harrier jump jet, the F-15, the F-14 A and D models, the Phoenix air-to-air missile, and the Sparrow air-to-air missile. And those Tomahawk cruise missiles that have become the standoff weapon of choice? Kerry wanted to cut the program in half.
That's what makes the recent charge by John Kerry that troops have had to buy their own body armor so hypocritical. Because if John Kerry had had his way, our troops would have had to buy their own tanks, their own fighter jets, their own missiles, their own helicopters, their own warships, their own...you get the idea. (For the record, according to the Pentagon, all troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have body armor.)
His attack also ignores the fact that funding for additional body armor was contained in the $87 billion bill funding operations in Iraq and Afghanistan that John Kerry voted against (after he voted for it, of course).
Imagine what today's military would look like without the Apache helicopter; without the B-1 bomber; and without the F-15 or the F-14. Remember the thrill we all had during the first Gulf War each time a Patriot missile shot down one of Saddam's Scuds? If the country had listened to John Kerry in 1984, all of Saddam's Scuds would have gotten through.
Just a little while ago, critics were wrongly suggesting that Iraq is another Vietnam. While we may not be fighting another Vietnam, John Kerry would have us fighting in Iraq with the same weapons.
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1984; 2004; acqprocurement; defensebudget; defensecuts; defensespending; dhayworth; issues; jdhayworth; kerry; kerryrecord; military; nationalsecurity; weapons
John Kerry's vote against the $87 Bil for the soldiers is just another data point in a very long trend. BOdy armor heck. If Kerry had his way, our soldiers would be lucky if they weren't equipping themselves at the local US Cav or Ranger Joe's.
To: .cnI redruM
Was Kerry a proponent of a "nuclear freeze?"
Also, did he actually say that we would never defeat Communism?
2
posted on
03/22/2004 6:55:53 AM PST
by
Guillermo
(Your own personal Konservative Klick-Guerilla)
To: .cnI redruM
or Cabela's
To: .cnI redruM; Guillermo
4
posted on
03/22/2004 7:00:18 AM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
To: .cnI redruM
If Kerry had had his way in the 1980's, we'd be in a sorry, sorry state right now militarily, with weapon systems of Vietnam-era vintage.
Central America would be Red, most likely under Cuban hegemony and Soviet protection. Russia would still be under the Soviet yoke, with the Iron Curtain still dividing Europe.
5
posted on
03/22/2004 7:08:29 AM PST
by
FierceDraka
(Service and Glory!)
To: Guillermo
Yes to both.
On A, he would never have been prominent in mASS politics unless he embraced this position. Remember, when Kennedy ran against Jimmy Carter in the primaries, that was his hallmark issue.
On B, he backed himself into that corner back in the early 1970's. It's an example of lying down with the dogs and getting fleas.
6
posted on
03/22/2004 7:14:08 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Kerry - Yes to Iraq War, No to $87 Bil to pay for it.)
To: .cnI redruM
After all this time, I finally just figured out your screen name....
7
posted on
03/22/2004 7:16:50 AM PST
by
Guillermo
(Your own personal Konservative Klick-Guerilla)
To: FierceDraka
Very much so. Kerry is the last gasp of 1970's Limosene Liberalism. People need to be reminded of what those people stood for back in the 1970's when they were ascendant and owned the US Congress.
8
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:33 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Kerry - Yes to Iraq War, No to $87 Bil to pay for it.)
To: FierceDraka
Very much so. Kerry is the last gasp of 1970's Limousine Liberalism. People need to be reminded of what those people stood for back in the 1970's when they were ascendant and owned the US Congress.
9
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:42 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Kerry - Yes to Iraq War, No to $87 Bil to pay for it.)
To: Guillermo
Do recall listening to a link on FR wherein he said: We cannot AFFORD to fight communism across the world..........
10
posted on
03/22/2004 7:24:49 AM PST
by
litehaus
To: Guillermo
I wonder what I could have come up with sober?
11
posted on
03/22/2004 7:25:52 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Kerry - Yes to Iraq War, No to $87 Bil to pay for it.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
or cheaperthandirt.com :)
To: Britton J Wingfield
Shotgun News ?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson