Skip to comments.
Mansoor Ijaz slamming Richard Clarke on Fox'N Friends
Fox News Channel
Posted on 03/22/2004 4:28:39 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
Mansoor Ijaz just called Richard Clarke essentially a liar. Challenged virtually all of his claims -- and accused Clarke of stonewalling Ijaz's efforts to capture Bin Laden via the Sudanese.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bias; ccrm; foxnews; ijaz; media; richardclarke; stophillary; sudan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-254 next last
To: Peach
Clarke offered a chillingly prescient quote from one aide who agreed with him about Clinton administration inaction. "What's it going to take to get them to hit al Qaeda in Afghanistan? Does al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon?" said the dismayed Clintonista...
Wow...how many pieces of silver have the clintonoids promised this traitor to cover up THEIR failures?
161
posted on
03/22/2004 7:13:30 AM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: an amused spectator
Simon & Schuster is owned by Viacom which also owns CBS and 60 Minutes. Circle jerk promotion that happens to fit in with the Viacom execs partisan prejudices.
162
posted on
03/22/2004 7:13:47 AM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: All
163
posted on
03/22/2004 7:15:15 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Who's waiting for the return of her beloved Farscape!)
To: mtbopfuyn
What is the Peter principle? I bet my Peter is bigger than your Peter?
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Classic quote fo the AM. Don Imus said Clarke's publisher Simon & Schuster were...damn I can't remember the word...'terrorists'? possibly for allowint Clarke to publish this book.
165
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:50 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: captbarney
Is John Podhoretz any relation to Norman Podhoretz?
CA....
166
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:53 AM PST
by
Chances Are
(Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
To: twigs
You mean to tell me any regular Joe can call the CIA, and get insider information like this dude.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"He's always very excited about one thing or another, but it rarely seems that his breathless predictions come true."
If you recall, he was the one talking about Pakistans' "Father of the Islamic bomb" selling nuclear secrets to other countries MONTHS before anyone else said a word about it.
I think the guy has a lot of credibility.
168
posted on
03/22/2004 7:26:39 AM PST
by
EEDUDE
(Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
To: TomGuy
I have searched my local library as well as Amazon.com and can find no book by Richard Minter.
Would you be kind enough to give a title for the book?
Thank you for your help.
169
posted on
03/22/2004 7:27:12 AM PST
by
arjay
To: arjay
170
posted on
03/22/2004 7:30:01 AM PST
by
elli1
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Drudge: The Sunday Times has established that after a fierce internal row about the sincerity of the offer, the White House responded by sending Richard Clarke, Clinton's most senior counterterrorism adviser, to meet the rulers of the United Arab Emirates. They denied there was any such offer. Ijaz, however, maintained that the White House had thereby destroyed the deal, which was to have been arranged only through unofficial channels. Ijaz said that weeks later on a return trip to the Gulf he was taken on a late-night ride into the desert by his contact who told him that Clarke's front-door approach had upset a delicate internal balance and blown the deal. "Your government has missed a major opportunity," he recalls being told.
171
posted on
03/22/2004 7:38:32 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(God, Guns, and Country!)
To: arjay
172
posted on
03/22/2004 7:41:01 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hindsight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Bump!
To: Impeach the Boy
OTOH, perhaps this jackass's presence in the administration isn't fatal to the President, but only to the 'rat Party...Bush is seen by the electorate as a fair, fine leader during wartime. The 'rats (including those he allowed to remain) are falling on their swords trying to wipe him out, but are not being received very well.
At least it is a thought....
174
posted on
03/22/2004 7:43:49 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
I liked Dick Clarke when he hosted American Bandstand
(tee hee)
175
posted on
03/22/2004 7:46:23 AM PST
by
BSunday
To: twigs
Now it is getting clear. You can reread your post slowly and get a sense of what is wrong with this picture.
Here is what I get from your post. Mansoor is a Moslem Pakistani-American. He has an "investment" management company that employs the ex-CIA director? What is the CIA chief knows about investment? Why the investment company is called Crescent, a symbol of Islam? Are James Woosley, and Abrahmson (both known for their Neo-cons political views) connected to Islamic investments, or money laundering of funds to Islamic organizations?
That is essentially the reasons that the Saudis funded the Al Qaeda, and Egypt provided Zawahri and his hate ideologies, and Pakistan provided international network, and arm shipments, and the US is unable to get its arms around this monster. Simply because of lots of ex-big shots are on the take from the Saudis. This big banana republic of ours will never get its politics right because its politicians never think of AMERICA FIRST. One time we had a politician, who kept drumming that slogan, and you remember what happened to him? Both parties, and the Washington establishment ran him out of town; he has big ears, and he was short, and he speaks with an accent, he quit the race, and came back again, he worried about his daughter wedding
.
To: Peach
Thank you for working so hard to get the facts out. The Left hopes we will become discouraged and turn away from the struggle. b
177
posted on
03/22/2004 7:52:38 AM PST
by
Barset
To: Chances Are
Is John Podhoretz any relation to Norman Podhoretz?Norman is Johns son. Born of liberal parentage they have seen the light.
178
posted on
03/22/2004 7:53:25 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: jwalsh07
My bad. John is Normans son.
179
posted on
03/22/2004 7:54:09 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I see truth in what you are saying...I hope this pans out the way you are suggesting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-254 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson