Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/20/2004 10:54:05 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
Don't those puppies require periodic maintenance?

Something about tritium being used in the trigger?

2 posted on 03/20/2004 11:00:24 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
"Al-Qaida has suitcase nuclear bombs"
Does Kerry still think this is just a distraction from Jobs and Health Care? HE is the one that is out of touch. I am absolutely horrified, this could quite easily be true. The only thing that leads me to beleive that Al Qaeda probably doesn't have such bombs is that I'm pretty sure they would have used them by now if they could have.
3 posted on 03/20/2004 11:02:28 PM PST by Betaille ("I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it." -John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
WTH is a "smart" briefcase bomb? Does it sprout legs and deliver itself to its intended target?
4 posted on 03/20/2004 11:08:17 PM PST by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Hamid Mir is a Taliban apologist. Perhaps al qaeda propagandist is more accurate.

Here is an interview with Hamid Mir

... and a few choice morsels...

IOL: How well do you know bin Laden?

HM: I know him from last four years. I met him twice, spend many days with him. He is not a scholar, he is a fighter. He wants to liberate Palestine. He wrote many poems against Israel. He is a jihadi [warrior] poet. His poems will come out very soon. I always ask him difficult questions and he answers my questions with patience.

IOL: Do you think that bin Laden is behind the 9-11 attacks?

HM: I don't think a man living in [the] mountains, without any communication facilities inside America can manage such kind of big operation.

6 posted on 03/20/2004 11:11:29 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
On a little further thought, there is another possibility.

They did buy some, and when they tried to use one, it was a dud--nothing happened.

I can not believe that they have nukes and have not tried to use them, but even the islamics realize that testing one would be a give-away. We are constantly on the lookout for nuclear tests, and can detect one anywhere in the world, 24/7.

So, they tried one out untested--probably in a truck bomb. Pushed the button and nothing happened. Probably New York, WTC before 9-11. Possibly Washington, DC. Could probably take out both the White House and congress.

Now they have a problem. If anyone finds out they have them, the western powers (even Spain) will unite and wipe them out. It is far easier to refurbish one that was professionally made than it is to make one from scratch, but it is still very hard.

Nothing worse than the world knowing you have nukes that don't work...

8 posted on 03/20/2004 11:15:09 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000; Physicist; VadeRetro
My understanding is that you need at least 25lbs. of plutonium to make a bomb. You need a moderating agent, a neutron reflecting shell, some tnt to squish the thing, and some shielding so you don't set off every radiation detector in town.

I am guessing the "suitcase" nuke has to weigh in at least 100 lbs.

I think it would be hard to move one around undetected.
11 posted on 03/20/2004 11:22:52 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
WND article, 2002
Bush, Blair warned of bin Laden nukes Al-Qaida purchased 20 suitcase arms from former KGB agents, says report
17 posted on 03/20/2004 11:29:07 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
The Suitcase Nuc threat is just about as creditable as was Idi Aman when he claimed that the Israel's used Atomic Hand Grenades during their raid at Entebbe.
23 posted on 03/20/2004 11:35:36 PM PST by Jeff Gordon (LWS - Legislating While Stupid. Someone should make this illegal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Does Osama Have a Nuclear Bomb?

Bin Laden has several Nuclear Suitcases "Bin Laden has several Nuclear Suitcases Reproduced from the Jerusalem Report: October 25th, 1999 Master terrorist Ossame Bin Laden has acquired portable nuclear devices, a U.S.-based expert on non-conventional terror believes. The only real question now is whether BinLaden has "a few," as Russian intelligence seems to think, or "over 20," a figure cited by intelligence services of moderate Arab regimes. "There is no longer much doubt that Bin Laden has finally succeeded in his quest for nuclear ‘suitcase bombs," says Yossef Bodansky, head of the Congressional Task Force on Non-Conventional Terrorism in Washington. In a recent book, Bodansky reports that Bin Laden’s associates acquired the devices through Chechnya, paying the Chechens $30 million in cash and two tons of Afghan heroin, worth about $70 million in Afghanistan and about 10 times that on the street in Western cities.

Bodansky’s statements corroborate 1998 testimony by former Russian security chief Alexander Lebed to the U.S. House of Representatives. Lebed said that 43 nuclear suitcases from the former Soviet arsenal, developed for the KGB in the 1970s, have vanished since the collapse of the former Soviet Union a decade ago. Lebed said one person could detonate such a bomb by himself, and kill 100,000 people.

Among the others who recognize the threat is Ben Venzke, director of Tempest Publishing. The U.S. firm plans to release a detailed technical handbook on dealing with nuclear terror next year. The danger, says Venzke, is quite real ? and is not confined to stolen Russian weapons. "It is really quite simple," he says, "to acquire radioactive material and combine it with an explosive or so-called dirty device." Yael Haran

26 posted on 03/20/2004 11:51:29 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
The AP story is percolating through the net.

Pakistani journalist: Al-Qaida claims has nuclear bombs

Hamid Mir put this story out now, IMO, because Al-Qaida is getting their ass hand to them and hopes the allied forces or some their populations will get scared and back off. The worse their situation, the more dire the threats.

27 posted on 03/21/2004 12:08:44 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Sure there is uncertainty, there almost always is.

It's time to dust off the Reagan ads - "Some say there is a bear in the woods. Others ay ther eis no bear. [pause] If there is a bear in the woods..."
29 posted on 03/21/2004 12:47:30 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000; All
 
Nuclear WMD "WHAT IF's"...
MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS LINKS:

http://www.clw.org/control/ctbchron.html

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq4-1.htm

http://www.projectshad.org/news/secrets-at-sea.htm

http://www.hk94.com/weblog/index.php?p=51&c=1

http://www.nv.doe.gov/news&pubs/photos&films/testfilms.htm

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq76-1.htm

http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/gallery.htm

http://www.downwinders.org/

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,275007585,00.html

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NGP/ChernDwinder.html

Tiny Nukes-- the backpack threat

30 posted on 03/21/2004 12:55:10 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Preposterous.
If they had them, they would have used them on 9/11, and then isued demands.

So9

36 posted on 03/21/2004 1:57:00 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
AQ doesn't have suitcase nukes. If they did, they would have used them already. They don't need them anyway. All AQ needs to do is set off a simple dirty bomb in a big city -- the media will do the rest of the terrorizing for them.
47 posted on 03/21/2004 8:02:54 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Good for a scare but Madrid proved that there's plenty they can do with conventional explosives. Including breaking up a righteous alliance.

I would think actually employing suitcase nukes would be more trouble than they'd be worth.
49 posted on 03/21/2004 10:25:11 AM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Very bad news.
50 posted on 03/22/2004 8:23:49 AM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson