Posted on 03/19/2004 9:59:58 AM PST by presidio9
THE controversial Mel Gibson film 'The Passion of the Christ' has been dismissed by the Evangelical Protestant Society as a 'Catholic' interpretation of events which "does not present the Gospel".
Wallace Thompson, secretary of the Evangelical Protestant Society, said the film displayed "an un-Biblical fixation on Mary, the mother of Jesus. None of this should surprise us, for both Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel, who plays the part of Christ, are enthusiastic devotees of the traditional teachings of the Church of Rome."
He further claims that Mel Gibson "belongs to an ultra-conservative Catholic group which does not recognise the reforms of Vatican II, and celebrates Mass in Latin".
Mr Thompson says that "this malign influence of Rome ought to cause all evangelical Protestants to reject The Passion of the Christ" and refuse to be swayed by the subtleties of the alleged arguments in favour of it.
Sadly, however, it will be welcomed and praised by many who ought to know better."
Mr Thompson also says that the film is "extremely violent", and that "anyone who watches it will be shaken and possibly terrified by its graphic and bloody scenes."
Havoc (#42)
Sorry, I saw the nun outfit she was wearing - insignificant. I don't see the idolatry that one would expect to see if it were centered on Mary ala the Pope's
blasphemous prayers that I've heard quoted. This centers on Christ. Rome should be glad Mel didn't present their doctrine of the Eucharist in all it's splendor. He'd have gone broke.
-----------------------
Havoc (#70)
When the pope puts his soul in Mary's hands and beseaches her to secure for him his salvation. That's blasphemy. It makes a point. This is not the type of thing that made it into Mel's movie. So I think it goes overboard to say it's "too catholic". I was actually bracing myself to see that sort of thing show up. I'm glad it did not or I'd have asked for my money back.
-----------------
Cronos (#74)
What are you talking about???
-----------
(#65) That's the MO of Havoc. When asked to cite something from Scripture, more often than not he either makes it up, leaves something out, and if all else fails, claims he's being picked on.
------
Havoc (#186) :
"To you mother of the human family and of nations we confidently entrust the whole of humanity with
it's hopes and fears. Do not let it lack the light of true wisdom. Guide it's steps in the ways
of peace. Enable all to meet Christ. Sustain us oh virgin mary on our journey of faith and
obtain for us the grace of eternal salvation" - Pope John Paul II - "Prayer for the Marian year"
-------------
Presidio9 (#199): "To you mother of the human family and of nations we confidently entrust the whole of humanity with it's hopes and fears. Do not let it lack the light of true wisdom. Guide it's steps in the ways of peace. Enable all to meet Christ. Sustain us oh virgin mary on our journey of faith and obtain for us the grace of eternal salvation" - Pope John Paul II - "Prayer for the Marian year"
It really disgusts me that you would delibrately misquote the Pope to make your pathetic anti-Catholicism work. I had know idea that your obsession was this pronounced. The actual prayer actually goes like this:
Enable all to meet Christ, the Way and the Truth and the Life. Sustain us, O Virgin Mary, on our journey of faith and obtain for us the grace of eternal salvation. O clement, O loving, O sweet Mother of God and our Mother, Mary!
You left the bolded part out because it destroys the point you were trying to make. That part of the prayer is the Pope's appeal to the Blessed Mother to help us know Christ better. As you may or may not know. The part you omitted is, of course, a direct referrence to John 14:6
"Jesus answered, 'I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'"
I am all to happy to expose you for the cheap charlatan that you are. You tellingly did not provide a link. The Pope's prayer, in its entirety, is here. You will be a much healthier person when you give up your irrational crusade against the RCC and focus on the things that are truely important.
-------------------------
Presidio9 (#226): Where did you "hear" this prayer with the crucial words left out? I provided a link. I suspect you either found it in anti-Catholic literature, so obsessed with discrediting the Pope that it would, in effect, stoop to the level of planting evidence. If you heard it coming from the mouth of a priest, either he made a mistake, or (more likely IMOHO) your need to attack the Pope led you to develop a selective hearing disorder.
In any case, I have thoughtfully provided a link to the actual words of the prayer. The John 14:6 referrence explains what he is saying quite efficiently.
Think about it for a second. John Paul II is a brilliant man. You would conceed this point, I expect? Popes have been dealing with the same tired accusation that you just made for centuries. Protestants have trouble understanding Mary's Special Role in Catholic Tradition, so they assume that in consititutes worship. It doesn't, but that's beside the point. Why would the Pope, of all people, add fuel to the fire by making such a blatant mistake? He wouldn't.
As a Christian, I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you did not intentionally change the quote to suit your argument. It's beside the point. You're still wrong.
Bunk. It has been demonstrated many times on this very thread. Again, actions speak louder than words. Who do you think you are kidding!
Sorry, he can't do that without lying.
Don't be silly. The Bishop of Rome had primacy cause that's what Jesus gave to Peter. It was only demonstrated by the "process of elimination."
SD
Somewhat disaapointing, as one of my first posts from Havoc was that he was a very good debator. It's easy to debate - while looking in the mirror! ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.