Incoming pro-gay troll alert!

self | march 17 2004 | little jeremiah

[little jeremiah]

Dear Freepers,

A fellow Freeper alerted me to another discussion board, wherein the leftist/deviants are advising one another to register at Free Republic in order to pose as Christians, with the purpose of promoting homosexuality in a subversive manner, thereby disrupting Free Republic.

Here are a few comments, just so that you will be on the alert for this sort of thing: (if I may be so bold):

I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 32 03/17/2004 @ 06:09PM

Hey....I've never done it but stumbled across a conservative board and created a character of a right-wing intolerant born-again Christian zealot. It's amazing how many people love me there. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. You create a character which you believe is preposterous and find out there are 100's out there like it. Use words like Rosie in an abomination and the posts of approval you get. I'm trying to figure out if somehow I can turn this into a good thing.

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:10PM

LOL that's crazy OP (j/k)

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:11PM

easy... just string them along for a few months, then let loose and tell them how you REALLY feel! Of course you'll be banned immediately, but with any luck you'll create so much mistrust among them that the board will fall apart. Good luck!

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:13PM

Use your persona to ask how you as a Christian can reconcile hating gays with eating shrimp, per Leviticus.

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:13PM

Nah, you get them to like you and know you, and then you start injecting some common sense here and there, like how you just cannot support government intrusiveness into the bedroom, and how it's just Democrat-like "Big Government" to think the government should solve all the social problems, and to just let the market decide, and that no churches would ever or should ever be compelled to perform gay marriages, but that you believe in freedom of religion in this country as a founding principle, so people should be able to choose to burn in hell or not, and that Bush shouldn't be forcing that choice on them. Stuff like that. I'm sure you can figure out a way to slowly, subtly get some stuff in there. Lots of good fodder in the whole budget big-government thing too.

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:14PM

Start raging about sodomites and anal sex like they do, and gradually make it sound more and more erotic.

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:14PM

6:11's idea is good, plus waiting will give you time to get used to how the board is moderated, and when would be the optimum time to reveal your true self when you don't expect any deleting moderators around for a while.

RE: I'm a troll on a Freeper board by: anonymous 03/17/2004 @ 06:15PM

I'm on my 2nd subversive character at Lucianne.com It's fun in a way, but I can only take those people in small doses. They really are toxic.

[tdadams]

They kept wanting me to post counter studies to disprove their subjective non-scientific stuff.

You mean like, "You haven't produced one article or piece of research disproving any point any of us has made", from post #217. I know, zzzzzz.

[tdadams]

You... attack everyone who points out the evil in the "gay" agenda.

Again, show me where I've ever "attacked" anyone. What is your definition of "attack"? Apparently simply disagreeing with you is an "attack" to you. That's an eerily fascist trait.

All you can do is call us names

Show me where, LJ. Show me one instance where I've called anyone on this board names. Pony up and prove your accusations. Good luck.

[subterfuge]

Homo's put their private parts into each others' fecal-matter and then put the privates in each others' mouths. Graphic enough for you?

[little jeremiah]

Well, you just said that I vilify and denigrate homosexuals. Explain how I do that.

And your statement here:

"in America, a free country, even homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose and you always jump to the hyperbole, saying we'll have to legalize bestiality, cannibalism, necrophilia, pedophilia, bigamy, etc. "

Why do you think homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose? I disagree, and for this, you trot out words like "vilify" and "denigrate".

Up until one generation or less ago, every state had laws on the books against sodomy and/or homosexual behavior specifically. For over 150 years no one (except maybe homosexuals) thought such laws unfair, wrong, or denying anyone their due rights.

I posit that this should be the status quo. Not to make it so "sex police" go into peoples' homes (they didn't even when such laws were in effect) but to prevent the public display of such acts, the seduction of youth, or the promotion of such deviancy as normal.

And as far as scripter's database, all you and your ilk can say is "bad man, bad man" and "bad research, bad research" like some kind of magic spell which will render such articles worthless by your continual repetition.

[whattajoke]

Homo's put their private parts into each others' fecal-matter and then put the privates in each others' mouths.

But 2 chicks... that's hot.

/Devils advocate mode

[ArGee]

I try to point out that in America, a free country, even homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose and you always jump to the hyperbole, saying we'll have to legalize bestiality, cannibalism, necrophilia, pedophilia, bigamy, etc.

The slippery slope isn't hyperbole, it's real and true. Just like it's real an true that if you don't limit government it will turn into a totalitarian dictatorship. Anyone who brings up the dangerous ends is not invoking hyperbole, just reminding us of the difficulty human beings have in achieving balance.

When the "free love" movement came out, people warned that this would lead to the acceptance of homosexuality. They were accused, as you just accused LJ, of using hyperbole to get involved with other people's business. They turned out to be right. (In those days nobody said, "So, what's your point?")

Now the train is rolling and it is hard to stop. Maybe we can stop the train at homosexuality. Maybe we can say that in these matters, but in no others, our sexual desires trump reason. But I don't see any historical reason to think so.

And the fact that "psychologists" are now starting to say that sexual activity might not be harmful, and might even be helpful, to children suggests that LJ and I are more likely to be right.

I could remind you that homosexuality is a mental illness. But that wouldn't be quite accurate any more. Homosexuality is an extreme expression of the notion that men, like dogs, are driven by their sexual urges rather than controlling them.

I don't support that notion.

Shalom.

[subterfuge]

"But 2 chicks... that's hot."

You got me there whattajoke! I dig your nic.

[little jeremiah]

Just in peoples' over-active imaginations.

Check out the streets of Berkelely CA or Eugene OR and take a look at actual lesbians. Plus, the idea of "getting off" while looking at two homosexuals performing their acts is rather degrading to everyone concerned. I know it's fashionable right now to think it's a turn on, but there's plenty of things people can accustom themselves to that are, objectively speaking, degrading.

[subterfuge]

You're right of course, in all seriousness. However, homosexual men are known to be more, how shall I say, course, in their actions. Guys are just more naturally nasty than women in general and put that together with their sexually perverted brains and its just ugly.

I'm reminded of the "pumping parties" that the homosexual/transgendered people have where they pump each other full of silicone in various places. You don't hear of homosexual women doing that kind of stuff. JMO.

[little jeremiah]

A number of years ago I lived in SF (was in the SF and south of for about 3 years, also lived there many years ago). You wouldn't believe the things I saw, and I went out of my want NOT to see things. For instance, at the "health food store" bulletin board - I remember a xeroxed ad for a "sex toy" party for just women - "bring your own chains and lubricant".

In SF you see many people who you have no idea whether they are male or female. I guess they don't know either. There are many sick freaks there.

I recognize what you're saying - but the whole feminist movement (which was originally based on homosexuality and hatred for men) has been busily destroying the natural feminine character of women for a couple of generations. So women - who have, generally speaking, natural female/feminine qualities - are being trained and indoctrinated to be "hard asses".

Feminism is anti-feminine. Its purpose is to destroy the natural female and natural male character, and the family. It is an arm of socialism and atheism, and totally destructive.

[subterfuge]

Good post lj. I have an uncle who is in his mid sixties who has lived with his "mate" for probably 25-30 years. Very committed, right?

Well a couple of years ago he was down from Canada and explained how he and "Aunt Brian" (thats what I call him) each had a "new friend" living with them (a foursome!), but they still cared deeply for each other. There are pictures of them wearing T-shirts with their ADDRESS printed on the shirt!

My uncle recently retired as the Dean of a major university in Toronto. He still consults for them though and has never left the academic world his entire life.