[tdadams]

You... attack everyone who points out the evil in the "gay" agenda.

Again, show me where I've ever "attacked" anyone. What is your definition of "attack"? Apparently simply disagreeing with you is an "attack" to you. That's an eerily fascist trait.

All you can do is call us names

Show me where, LJ. Show me one instance where I've called anyone on this board names. Pony up and prove your accusations. Good luck.

[little jeremiah]

Well, you just said that I vilify and denigrate homosexuals. Explain how I do that.

And your statement here:

"in America, a free country, even homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose and you always jump to the hyperbole, saying we'll have to legalize bestiality, cannibalism, necrophilia, pedophilia, bigamy, etc. "

Why do you think homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose? I disagree, and for this, you trot out words like "vilify" and "denigrate".

Up until one generation or less ago, every state had laws on the books against sodomy and/or homosexual behavior specifically. For over 150 years no one (except maybe homosexuals) thought such laws unfair, wrong, or denying anyone their due rights.

I posit that this should be the status quo. Not to make it so "sex police" go into peoples' homes (they didn't even when such laws were in effect) but to prevent the public display of such acts, the seduction of youth, or the promotion of such deviancy as normal.

And as far as scripter's database, all you and your ilk can say is "bad man, bad man" and "bad research, bad research" like some kind of magic spell which will render such articles worthless by your continual repetition.