[jwalburg]

a politically motivated attempt to smear the legacy of ex-President Clinton.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

[federal]

This is the kind of crap the democrats would pull just so they would have something to blame on the Republicans.

[Cicero]

Clinton-appointed CIA Driector George Tenet has yet to comment on the bin Laden video.

Why is Tenet still running the CIA? Why did he run the CIA for one minute after President Bush took office? This was a truly major blunder on Bush's part.

[BigSkyFreeper]

CNN anchorman Wolf Blitzer argued that the video broadcast by NBC may have seriously damaged national security.

Yet CNN also broadcasted the tape, although they credited NBC News, still, CNN broadcasted the tape in it's entirety.

[TomGuy]

CNN anchorman Wolf Blitzer argued that the video broadcast by NBC may have seriously damaged national security.

Wow, CNN's Wolfie is now the standard bearer for our national security interests.

[Excuse me while I faint............KKKRRRRRTHUNK!]

[BigSkyFreeper]

Ensor explained that the decision to release the tape may have been a politically motivated attempt to smear the legacy of ex-President Clinton.

The only legacy of the Clinton administration is appeasement to terrorists, missiles lobbed into aspirin factories and Chinese embassies, and the blue dress. This tape doesn't smear Clinton's legacy, it demonstrates Clinton's ineffectiveness of taking out bin-Laden a year before 9/11, even after Clinton's refusal to accept Sudan's offer of Osama's head on a platter 4 separate times.

[rottndog]

Clintoon has sooooo much blood on his hands.

[adaven]

Can someone please post a link to the video?

[Brimack34]

CNN and the Demorats along with the big three have done nothing but damaged national security. Always blame the leak not what is in it. I see a pattern here!!!

[Jim_Curtis]

CNN anchorman Wolf Blitzer argued that the video broadcast by NBC may have seriously damaged national security.

---
Wait just one second...why, for what purpose, was this thing kept a secret for so long? How in the hell could this possibly damage national security?

The question that must be answered is, why was this thing kept confidential for so long?

[nutmeg]

Ensor explained that the decision to release the tape may have been a politically motivated attempt to smear the legacy of ex-President Clinton.

ROTFLMAO!!!

[nutmeg]

Ensor explained that the decision to release the tape may have been a politically motivated attempt to smear the legacy of ex-President Clinton.

ROTFLMAO!!!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[Rocky]

Every time the Democrats get caught with their pants down, they cry "foul". Incriminating e-mails between Senators? Prosecute the one who revealed them. Clinton let bin Laden get away? Find the criminal who released that information.

[Prince Charles]

Ensor explained that the decision to release the tape may have been a politically motivated attempt to smear the legacy of ex-President Clinton.

Ummm, the real Clinton legacy is already smeared -- all over Monica's blue dress.

[McGavin999]

Oh please, we've been seeing the kinds of pictures taken by the Preditors since Afghanistan.

[TonyM]

I have a great idea. We should train pigs strapped with explosives to search mountains and caves of Afghanistan and to blow up when they find someone. The idea of being killed by exploding pig gets would put the fear in all Muslims.

[nutmeg]

Here's a little something to add to the 'ol Klintoon legacy...

Excerpt from National Review Online, September 11, 2003:

Clinton’s Loss?
How the previous administration fumbled on bin Laden.

A Q&A by Kathryn Jean Lopez

http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory091103b.asp

Lopez: In sum, how many times did Bill Clinton lose bin Laden?

Miniter: Here's a rundown. The Clinton administration:

1. Did not follow-up on the attempted bombing of Aden marines in Yemen.

2. Shut the CIA out of the 1993 WTC bombing investigation, hamstringing their effort to capture bin Laden.

3. Had Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a key bin Laden lieutenant, slip through their fingers in Qatar.

4. Did not militarily react to the al Qaeda bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

5. Did not accept the Sudanese offer to turn bin Laden.

6. Did not follow-up on another offer from Sudan through a private back channel.

7. Objected to Northern Alliance efforts to assassinate bin Laden in Afghanistan.

8. Decided against using special forces to take down bin Laden in Afghanistan.

9. Did not take an opportunity to take into custody two al Qaeda operatives involved in the East African embassy bombings. In another little scoop, I am able to show that Sudan arrested these two terrorists and offered them to the FBI. The Clinton administration declined to pick them up and they were later allowed to return to Pakistan.

10. Ordered an ineffectual, token missile strike against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory.

11. Clumsily tipped off Pakistani officials sympathetic to bin Laden before a planned missile strike against bin Laden on August 20, 1998. Bin Laden left the camp with only minutes to spare.

12-14. Three times, Clinton hesitated or deferred in ordering missile strikes against bin Laden in 1999 and 2000.

15. When they finally launched and armed the Predator spy drone plane, which captured amazing live video images of bin Laden, the Clinton administration no longer had military assets in place to strike the archterrorist.

16. Did not order a retaliatory strike on bin Laden for the murderous attack on the USS Cole.

[Political Junkie Too]

CNN anchorman Wolf Blitzer argued that the video broadcast by NBC may have seriously damaged national security.

Based on recent events, I would have thought that Mr. Blitzer would be more interested in the manner of the leaking of the tape, rather than in the contents of the tape.

-PJ

[technomage]

CNN anchorman Wolf Blitzer argued that the video broadcast by NBC may have seriously damaged national security.

Translation: We here at CNN are so damn mad that NBC aired that footage before we could that we will even stoop to defending national security to beat down the infidels at NBC.

[Finalapproach29er]

Heads should roll.

This is inexcusable. IMO