Divided over gay marriage

LA Times ^ | March 12, 04 | Roy Rivenburg

[churchillbuff]

From LA Times of March 12: ...

"Divided over gay marriage" by Roy Rivenburg Paula Ettelbrick, a law professor who runs the International Gay & Lesbian Human Rights Commission, recommends legalizing a wide variety of marriage alternatives, including polyamory, or group wedlock. An example could include a lesbian couple living with a sperm-donor father, or a network of men and women who share sexual relations.

One aim, she says, is to break the stranglehold that married heterosexual couples have on health benefits and legal rights. The other goal is to "push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family, and in the process transform the very fabric of society." ... [snip]

[momfirst]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! It has begun!! Lord have mercy on us.

[thoughtomator]

Begun? We're already hip-deep in the muck.

[Diogenesis]

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

[SpyGuy]

The other goal is to "push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family, and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

That didn't take long, now did it. After polygamy, will come man-boy marriage. After man-boy, will come incestuous marriage. After incestuous, will come bestiality marriage. After bestiality, will come necrophilia marriage.

It will all add up to the death of civilization.

[churchillbuff]

From a website: "Ms. Ettelbrick has been widely published, in law journals, books and other publications, and has spoken nationally and internationally on GLBT issues. She has taught law for 11 years and currently teaches Sexuality and the Law at New York University Law School, the University of Michigan Law School and Barnard College."

[Jeff Chandler]

Those parameters are too limiting. What about marriage with imaginary friends?

[xzins]

post-Christian west

[jwalburg]

Wants to marry chair

[Arpege92]

"The other goal is to 'push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family,' and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

Push the parameters of sex huh? Does that include children being sexually abused by family members and strangers as well? This whole things makes me sick!!!!!

[Free ThinkerNY]

Leftist lawyers are a Satanic cult.

[churchillbuff]

Forget about this professor. Don't you know that the real threat is MEL GIBSON!!

[Palladin]

a network of men and women who share sexual relations.

Oh...the Charles Manson model.

[txhurl]

'Bout time! Who's our fourth?

[mvpel]

...health benefits and legal rights.

See, that's what this is all about - benefits. If people would just keep their hands out of other peoples' pockets, and mind their own damn business, none of this hoo-haw would even be happening.

I guess government is just too addictive for them to stop unless they're forced to, though.

[Oberon]

It will all add up to the death of civilization.

Nah... only the death of our civilization. There are still places where they won't have this sh--.

[jwalburg]

Saying that children need mothers and fathers might come to be regarded as a form of hate speech, he adds.

This is one aspect no one talks about. Scary!

[momfirst]

LMAO!! Thanks for the link - I really needed it.

[Kerberos]

"See, that's what this is all about - benefits"

You've got that right. When this really began is when we started becoming a socialist nation in the first part of the last century.

[squidly]

The other goal is to "push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family, and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

Wow. They're not usually this blunt about it.