Skip to comments.
TWO WITNESSES COULD END KERRY PRESIDENTIAL RUN -- "The Phoenix Project"
various sources
| 3-12-04
| dfu
Posted on 03/12/2004 10:32:07 AM PST by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-385 next last
To: doug from upland
*bump*
This would be one of many centerpieces in a "JFK's Peace Activism" story. At the least, it'll keep him off-balance, even though the facts are 30 years old.
21
posted on
03/12/2004 10:40:13 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
Let the reporters start asking questions. It is time to put Kerry on the defensive. He should open the records and prove he was not there. Any mention of this is going to show how crazy the organization was. It will taint him badly. Hey, Terry McAwful, get ready to put some ice on it.
22
posted on
03/12/2004 10:42:09 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: BooBoo1000
I want Kerry to get the nomination. I do not want the " Wicked Witch" to be brought out and dusted off at the Convention. Don't for a minute think that the DEM candidate for president can't change after the convention. There are NO absolute rules.
23
posted on
03/12/2004 10:42:10 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: doug from upland
"And Terry McAuliffe knows it"So does everyone else in the dnc.....which is why the liberal pressholes willfully ignore the truth and toe the line, braying jackasses that they are.
One can only hope that this gets as far as FoxNews, but it's a thin hope.
24
posted on
03/12/2004 10:42:28 AM PST
by
kahoutek
((A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged))
To: doug from upland
Bttt
To: doug from upland
To: doug from upland
Think of the implications. If the mainsteam media and major news networks do their homework...You're trying to be funny here, right? This story will get the same airplay as clinton's trips to the Soviet Union or algore's college failures.
To: doug from upland
Who's the crook and liar?
28
posted on
03/12/2004 10:44:24 AM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: doug from upland
There was a thread on this but I can't seem to find it.
AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
29
posted on
03/12/2004 10:44:31 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(KERRY KNEW HIS MIC WAS ON!!!!!!)
To: doug from upland; StriperSniper; Mo1; Peach; Howlin; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
MEGA PING!!!!
Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
30
posted on
03/12/2004 10:45:03 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(KERRY KNEW HIS MIC WAS ON!!!!!!)
To: doug from upland
If the mainsteam media and major news networks do their homework, they may discover that a man who wants to be president was at a meeting discussing the possiblity of assassinating United States senators.
Giant, unmerited, and unprecedented IF bump!!
31
posted on
03/12/2004 10:45:18 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: xm177e2
If Kerry was there, he had an obligation to inform the authorities that a potential crime may take place. This may now be the second time that Kerry admitted to/or was part of, a criminal act.
32
posted on
03/12/2004 10:45:29 AM PST
by
cwb
(Kerry: The only man who could make Bill Clinton look like a moderate)
To: HitmanNY; doug from upland
Depends on how he voted at the meeting, I suppose.And therein lies the "rub". If you don't nail these politicians down with a story they can't wriggle out of, it's pretty much useless in Presidential politics! (with all respect to you doug. You've done some impressive homework, and it clearly is another GOOD example of how much Kerry flip flops, and probably a good example of how quick he is to lie). But from the source mentioned in this article,
But according to the current head of Missouri Veterans for Kerry, Randy Barnes, Mr. Kerry,who was then 27,was at the meeting, voted against the plot, and then orally resigned from the organization.
Again, there's how J.F.Kerry is gonna get out of this. The fact that he originally lied about being at the meeting will be swept under the spun rug, as he'll admit to being there, but simply say as Barnes says that he voted against the plan, and promptly quit.
It won't matter to his supporters that he lied about being there in the first place. They'll just apologize for him by saying, "Oh, he has a lot on his mind, and just forgot about being there. Besides, also, John's such a good guy that he probably thought, 'there's no way I could be part of such a thing'".
Bottom line, an interesting tale, and really shows to those with a CLEAR mind what a shmuck he is, but for his supporters, since it's not 100%....etc.
GOOD job though doug, don't get me wrong. Keep up the good work.
To: doug from upland
As I said a friend during a lunchtime conversation, we must hold our fire until Sen. Heinz is technically nominated or we will end up facing somebody else who's not such a target rich environment.
34
posted on
03/12/2004 10:46:47 AM PST
by
McGruff
To: OXENinFLA
That clause relates to Congress, and the ability to serve in Congress. It says that Congress can seat the Representative or Senator if the issue comes up.
In short, this is a non-starter. Politically, Kerry will be damaged by his presidential run. He'll be outed as loopy.
35
posted on
03/12/2004 10:47:13 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: xm177e2
I think he already lied about being there-- to David Brinkley, I believe.
36
posted on
03/12/2004 10:47:24 AM PST
by
walden
To: doug from upland; hchutch
Two witnesses have placed John Kerry at a Kansas City meeting of the hierarchy of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War in November of 1971. At that meeting, they actually took a vote about assassinating United States senators. It was called "The Phoenix Project" and was the brainchild of Scott Camil. Kerry spokesman David Wade has denied Kerry was at the meeting.The moral bankruptcy of the left becomes stunningly obvious with the bolded sentence.
In a pluralistic society such as ours, you don't vote on the idea of political assassination. You place the a$$hole proposing it under citizen's arrest and call the police!
37
posted on
03/12/2004 10:47:31 AM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: xm177e2
I just read on another post a few moments ago that Kerry did just that, i.e., he voted "No" to the proposal, then resigned from the organization. Now, whether or not this is true is another question.
To: miele man
It is time to find out the truth. Let this story rule the airwaves like the phony AWOL story.
39
posted on
03/12/2004 10:49:07 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: lodwick; Cuttnhorse; operation clinton cleanup; Servant of the 9; catpuppy; null and void; ...
A follow up ping
40
posted on
03/12/2004 10:49:21 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-385 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson