Skip to comments.
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/8/2004
TradeSports.com ^
| Monday, March 8, 2004
| Momaw Nadon
Posted on 03/08/2004 3:09:00 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: Betaille
Hope you are right, and we need six more Republican Senators if we are on a roll.
Kerry is scary.
Where can I get a bumper sticker that says that?
41
posted on
03/08/2004 6:11:17 PM PST
by
oldtimer
(t)
To: JLS; Neets; Dales
I don't have a ping list, but I'll ask Neets to put you on hers and Dales.
*ping* Neets, please add JLS to yall's ping list. Thanks.
42
posted on
03/08/2004 6:49:19 PM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: onyx
Heres a scary thought. If you reverse NH and NM which are the two where Bush is closest to losing (58%), we are looking at 269-269. What happens then?
To: thepatriot1
Your scenario is scary, but I don't think it'll be as close this time, do you?
44
posted on
03/08/2004 8:01:50 PM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: Momaw Nadon; nevergiveup; scan58; AuH2ORepublican; BoomerBob; Galatians513; onyx; KJacob; ...
This is not DALES' weekly ECB thread, but here's a ping for interested folks anyway.
45
posted on
03/09/2004 5:02:31 AM PST
by
Neets
(“I now know Him in a more personal way that I have. It is as it was " Jim Caviezel)
To: Neets; JLS
Please add JLS.
46
posted on
03/09/2004 5:04:43 AM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: onyx
I got it toots!!
Good morning!!
47
posted on
03/09/2004 5:05:54 AM PST
by
Neets
(“I now know Him in a more personal way that I have. It is as it was " Jim Caviezel)
To: Neets
Morning to you too, Neets! :)
48
posted on
03/09/2004 5:06:47 AM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: Momaw Nadon
Bush Will lose NEw Hampshire and New Mexico. I fthatoccurs, and aeverything else stays the saem, we have a tie.
Can we actually put money on these odds? If so, I'll put up one Million dollars to win 20K that Kerry will win DC.
49
posted on
03/09/2004 5:25:59 AM PST
by
Archie Bunker on steroids
(When the going gets tough, liberals quit......thats why they can't lead us post 9-11)
To: Momaw Nadon
Nice typing Bunker.
Bush Will lose New Hampshire and New Mexico. If that occurs, and everything else stays the same, we have a tie.
Can we actually put money on these odds? If so, I'll put up one Million dollars to win 20K that Kerry will win DC.
50
posted on
03/09/2004 5:29:07 AM PST
by
Archie Bunker on steroids
(When the going gets tough, liberals quit......thats why they can't lead us post 9-11)
To: thepatriot1
What happens then? The dems will turn up the cheating until they win. I think the race will be very close. All those who think Bush will run away with this may have forgotten to add in the dems "cheat" factor. They are masters at cheating and are getting better at it all the time.
51
posted on
03/09/2004 5:31:43 AM PST
by
Snowy
To: Momaw Nadon
The media-Hollywood complex has decided to take the last big step towards becoming the Teaching Magesterium of the New Culture-they are going to instruct the faithful to vote for Kerry.
What interesting times we live in!
52
posted on
03/09/2004 5:33:14 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: Archie Bunker on steroids
Bush is a lock up here in NH.
Write it down.
In 2000, we didn't know him, and we don't care much about cowboy boots.
That was then. This is now.
Put NH in the Bush column, and leave it there.
53
posted on
03/09/2004 5:35:11 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: thepatriot1
Heres a scary thought. If you reverse NH and NM which are the two where Bush is closest to losing (58%), we are looking at 269-269. What happens then? Don't be scared. Jimmy Madison and Tommy Jefferson have a plan.
54
posted on
03/09/2004 5:38:40 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: thepatriot1; onyx; Jim Noble; Archie Bunker on steroids; Wallaby
If you reverse NH and NM which are the two where Bush is closest to losing (58%), we are looking at 269-269.
New Hampshire 58.0
New Mexico 58.0 Total, 9 EV
A probability of .58 of getting 5 electoral votes should not be treated the same as a certainty of getting 5 electoral votes. Weigh the electoral votes of each state by the probability of Bush's getting those votes (according to the traders), and you'll compute an expected electoral vote count of 289 for Bush. 26 posted on 03/08/2004 7:17:56 PM EST by Wallaby
Pennsylvania 49.0 21
West Virginia 47.0 5
Wisconsin 46.0 10 The table of odds shows lots more for Kerry to bite his nails over. PA almost a perfect tossup; WVa and WI scarcely less so.
We know that those odds will change between now and November, but we don't know how. But you'd have to say that Kerry really needs to move them his way to be in the hunt. For such a putatively close election, you have to say that the number of EV assigned a probability of more than 40 and less than 60% is notably small. But of those, the EV having probabilities within 5% of 50 is all below rather than above 50%, and the number of EV involved is substantial. Kerry will have to play defense as well as offense.
To: Archie Bunker on steroids
Most state markets are VERY thin, so you can't really put meaningful money into these contracts. The national vote is fairly liquid.
56
posted on
03/09/2004 3:02:47 PM PST
by
labard1
To: Dog
"I think CA is in play..."
If you're right, November will be a landslide for the good guys! :)
57
posted on
03/09/2004 3:05:12 PM PST
by
labard1
To: stylin19a
"it's against the law to bet on presidential elections"
Not quite true. The Iowa electronic market is located in Iowa and has been around for several elections. It sharply limits the number of contracts that any participant can own, so it's impossible to lose a lot of money. The theory is that it's educational, and tests the efficiency of markets in predicting a variety of events. This is its home page:
http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/ . Some contracts are limited to academic traders only.
58
posted on
03/09/2004 3:13:11 PM PST
by
labard1
To: Jim Noble
Havn't you guys been filling up with Massholes over the last few years. They ;leave their over taxed craphole, come to NH, then eventually turn it into the liberal cess poll they left. Polls don't look good at this point, but i sure hope NH comes through.
59
posted on
03/09/2004 7:06:03 PM PST
by
Archie Bunker on steroids
(When the going gets tough, liberals quit......thats why they can't lead us post 9-11)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson