Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Owens needs reality check for Senate run [CO]
Denver Post ^ | 03/04/04 | Jim Spencer

Posted on 03/04/2004 6:52:18 AM PST by BlackRazor

Owens needs reality check for Senate run

By Jim Spencer Denver Post Columnist

As he decides whether to run for the United States Senate to replace Republican Ben Nighthorse Campbell, here are four words of advice for Colorado Gov. Bill Owens:

Focus on the family.

The governor remains separated from his wife.

"There has been no change in their status since the announcement was made in September," Owens' press secretary Dan Hopkins said Wednesday afternoon.

A couple of hours earlier, Ted Halaby, the chairman of the Colorado Republican Committee, tried to say that doesn't matter.

"I don't think the separation from his wife will be an issue," Halaby said of a possible Owens candidacy. "This is not like the '60s," when a divorce cost Republican Nelson Rockefeller a chance to run for president.

Unfortunately, broken marriages are "all too frequent" today, Halaby continued.

"It's a new age," he said, "a new time."

Owens' marriage is not broken, just bent. It's hard to see how he can fix things while he's out campaigning at the Chamber of Commerce in Manitou Springs.

Campbell will vacate his Senate seat at the end of the year for health reasons.

A statement praising Campbell's public service was all the governor was going to offer Wednesday, said deputy chief of staff Sean Duffy.

"I have not had a chance to talk to the governor," Halaby said. "The governor would be a strong candidate. The last poll showed him with the support of 65 percent of the people."

He's also one who deserves to be challenged if he runs before getting his personal house in order.

The "new age" where Owens might try for the Senate is the one where he and his party unilaterally proclaim ownership of the moral high ground. The guv loves to issue the conservative battle cry "traditional family values." For years, he has positioned himself as holier than large segments of Colorado's population.

Most recently, Owens declared his support for Colorado Rep. Marilyn Musgrave as she tries to amend the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage.

But Owens has long been about proclaiming that it's his way or the highway in a moral agenda.

Dictating other people's behavior is risky business. Legislating love and relationships so they conform to your definition turns you into a target if you can't realize your own standards.

You can't spend a political career presuming to look in other people's bedrooms and expect them not to look in yours.

So focus on the family, Governor.

Here's hoping you can get your life right before you run.

Here's hoping you don't run if you can't.

Otherwise, get ready to answer for everything.

You're the guy who invited the inquisition.

Any attempt to deflect your family situation as your personal business while your nose is stuck deep in everyone else's morality reeks of hypocrisy.

The sophistry of your claims to "traditional family values" and your self-serving stand on gay marriage made it one.

For your supporters to claim your marital problems no longer matter in your public life shows the very situational ethics that members of the religious right deplore in folks they consider spiritual inferiors.

You can divorce yourself from that difficulty only by making up with your wife or by changing your tune.

You have always courted the moralistic, judgmental wing of your party. It will be interesting to see how folks on the religious right will rationalize their pretension if you run.

More interesting will be the willingness of your Democrat opponent to call you on the issue.

Rutt Bridges, the richest and therefore the most prominent Democratic hopeful, is divorced. His ex-wife showed up to support him when he announced his candidacy.

Bridges said Wednesday that the Senate campaign ought to be more about issues than personalities.

That's good political news for you, Governor. But it hardly excuses you from your own double standard. Nor does it make you less vulnerable on character issues as the campaign progresses.

Campbell's withdrawal makes Colorado's Senate race one of the most important in the country. The Republican majority in the Senate stands at 51-48 with one independent.

Halaby predicted that both major parties will pour big bucks into the state as a result of Campbell's retirement.

"We will be targeted for that seat," Halaby said. "There are a lot of ramifications."

Those ramifications may depend on whether voters choose to hold a moral arbiter to his actions or to his words.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2004; billowens; colorado; electionussenate; nighthorsecampbell; owens; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Here we go - they're already gunning for Owens.
1 posted on 03/04/2004 6:52:19 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
I wonder if this author would have written a similar column about Bill Clinton before his Presidential run or The Shrew before her Senatorial campaign?
2 posted on 03/04/2004 6:53:58 AM PST by Coop ("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Here's hoping you don't run

Clearly the point of the columnist. I don't want an evil conservative in the senate, and I know you'd win if you ran, so you better not run, and if you do, I'll attack the hell out of you, particularly your family.

3 posted on 03/04/2004 7:01:55 AM PST by JohnnyZ (People don't just bump into each other and have sex. This isn't Cinemax! -- Jerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Most recently, Owens declared his support for Colorado Rep. Marilyn Musgrave as she tries to amend the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage.

And John Kerry, who is divorced, supports amending Massachusetts' Constitution to ban gay marriage.

Double standard.

4 posted on 03/04/2004 7:06:41 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I wonder if this author would have written a similar column about Bill Clinton

LOL. I was thinking the same thing.
The party of skank -- the teen pro-aborts, pro-child sex, pro-homo, pro-NOW hags people are trying to take a higher moral ground? Po-leese!

A left wing homosexual being interviewed about homosexual marriage on FOX actually claimed heterosexual polygamy and incest are immoral and illegal!!! No joke! He thought he was more moral then them, and had a right to marry where they didn't! No kidding!

The left wingers are going totally insane. They've seriously gone over the edge. They've fallen head first in the lake of hells fire. Cuckoo! Cuckoo!

5 posted on 03/04/2004 7:07:47 AM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Owen's situation has been well known for a long, long time, even before it became "official." It's really pretty irrelevant and hasn't hurt him politically. This is just another liberal making his case for going negative before he does it - in fact, this itself is going negative. Of course, nobody could question the Clintons' marriage, oh my no, that would be "prying" and "invading their bedroom." But when it is a Republican, liberals have no problem doing that at all.

This notion that having certain standards and not meeting them personally disqualifies you for public office, well, if we were not permitted to aim high despite our personal faults and limitations, we'd all still be living in caves.

6 posted on 03/04/2004 7:09:46 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Kerry supports a "trading up" amendment to the Constitution. If you can find a richer heiress to marry, you're allowed to discard your old one at no penalty.
7 posted on 03/04/2004 7:09:50 AM PST by TheBigB (I know you are but what am I? =P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
A little off-topic, but something is bugging me...

Why are the media saying that Campbell's prostate cancer treatment is a reason for senate retirement, yet never bring up Kerry's prostate cancer?
8 posted on 03/04/2004 7:17:12 AM PST by EllaMinnow (The best days of America lie ahead GWB 2/23/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Kerry supports a "trading up" amendment to the Constitution. If you can find a richer heiress to marry, you're allowed to discard your old one at no penalty.

Being a skanky gigolo is more moral than a man with a disagreement - to loonie lefties, anyway.

9 posted on 03/04/2004 7:18:18 AM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Because Campbell explicitly cited his health as a reason for his retirement, but lots of politicians have had prostate cancer and continued their careers with no problem. Campbell also had other reasons for retiring and "health" is just one factor that plays particularly well.
10 posted on 03/04/2004 7:22:18 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Jim Spencer is fairly new at The Post and is a typical bleeder to the extreme. I ignore him.
11 posted on 03/04/2004 7:23:37 AM PST by Cai Della
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
I'm sure you're right, and you're very reasonable about it.

I'm just peeved because Kerry is being given a free pass on his health, even though he looks like a cadaver.
12 posted on 03/04/2004 7:28:26 AM PST by EllaMinnow (The best days of America lie ahead GWB 2/23/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
What about Owens' situation has been known for a long, long time?
13 posted on 03/04/2004 7:31:09 AM PST by coloradomom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
GOTV in November. What are you doing to volunteer in Colorado to G O T V. Drive vans to veteran's hospitals. Man the phone banks and call homes of conservatives and if there is a housewife there with no car during the days, offer her a ride to the polls. How do you get those phone numbers? Volunteer with the campaign.

G O T V. Nothing else matters.
14 posted on 03/04/2004 7:36:34 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
ratmedia droppings.
15 posted on 03/04/2004 7:48:41 AM PST by jmaroneps37 ( lurch is dukakis with the eyebrows hacked off. That's the only difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I couldn't have said it better Johnny. This is nothing more than a veiled threat targeted at Owens as he makes up his mind to discourage him from running. This guy shouldn't be allowed to mention the word hypocrisy.
16 posted on 03/04/2004 7:52:20 AM PST by zebrahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Yeah, Kerry's been given a free pass on LOTS of things... but I think that's going to end soon now that the 'RATS have ended their primaries.
17 posted on 03/04/2004 7:54:15 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
I think/hope/pray that you're right.
18 posted on 03/04/2004 7:56:36 AM PST by EllaMinnow (The best days of America lie ahead GWB 2/23/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
For those not in the area . . . 'The Denver Post' is very liberal. (Shocking!)

No surprise that the day Sen Nighthorse Campbell announces his retirement, the libs are trying to shape public opinion about any Republican candidates that would dare think of running for his senate seat. That's what they do. They can't help it. It's their job.

Typical Denver Post liberalism here. No more no less.

Governer Bill Owens would be a great Senator from the State of Colorado.
19 posted on 03/04/2004 8:15:47 AM PST by BluSky (“Don’t make me come down there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
It's really pretty irrelevant and hasn't hurt him politically. This is just another liberal making his case for going negative before he does it

We really need to coin a term for that, since they're doing it all over the country, i.e., Kerry saying he will stand up to the "Bush attack machine" before anybody has said one word about him.

It's like false bravado -- along the lines of a preemptive strike, IMO.

20 posted on 03/04/2004 8:18:56 AM PST by Howlin (Just another unrepentant Bush supporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson