Posted on 03/03/2004 5:50:58 PM PST by Calpernia
The coalition against terrorists is engaged in a war to ensure the will of the many prevails against the wishes of a few, said Defense Department leaders before the House Armed Services Committee today.
Army Gen. John Abizaid, commander of U.S. Central Command, and Peter Rodman, assistant defense secretary for international security affairs, told the representatives that the recent attacks in Baghdad and Karbala underscore the danger still facing the coalition in the region.
Attacks March 2 against Shiia pilgrims killed 117 and wounded 500. Abizaid said the attacks were the responsibility of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a terrorist affiliated with al Qaeda. "These attacks are despicable, and they show the clear lie of the idea that Zarqawi, Osama bin Laden, (bin Laden lieutenant Ayman al-Zawahari) and their like are fighting for Islam," Abizaid said. "They are the enemies of Islam. They have killed more Muslims in the past month than anybody could ever imagine, for no vision other than to cause destruction and to cause civil war to take place in Iraq."
Abizaid has a number of challenges in his area of operations. In addition to operations in Iraq, he also commands troops involved in counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan and a joint task force operating in the Horn of Africa. He said commanders and troops in all three regions are facing difficult challenges caused by extremists. "Despite that, I'm very optimistic that we have the troops, the equipment, and the necessary will to fight our way through to a good conclusion, as we maintain our patience, our tenacity, and our courage," he said.
The general said if the terrorists are successful in Iraq, it could result in the "Talibanization" of the Middle East. "The vast, vast majority of the people in the Middle East do not want that to happen, and they join us in this struggle against these extremists," he said.
Abizaid stressed the war in not one just for stabilization, but a fight "about extremism vs. moderation. It's a fight about the ideas of free men vs. those who would enslave people."
Rodman said the U.S. strategy in the region is to "bolster our friends, help our friends, help promote the people who share our values or who come close to our values of moderation and peace, and help them in their struggle against the extremists."
The tragic attacks against moderation are disturbing, Rodman said, and should concern all, but the most important aspect in Afghanistan and Iraq is the political process -- "the remarkable project of political construction that is going on, and (that) I would say (is) making remarkable progress in both places."
In Afghanistan, the Loya Jirga constructed a new constitution, and elections are set for June.
In Iraq, the Iraqi Governing Council agreed on the transitional administrative law. Rodman said that law – which will serve as the basis for governing Iraq once sovereignty is returned June 30 – is a remarkable example of "political compromise, political coexistence being demonstrated by all of the moderate Iraqis that we have been working with since liberation."
Terrorists trying to prevent democracy aren't the story, Rodman said. "The real story is not that there are people trying to derail this process," he said. "The real story is that this process is moving forward regardless."
Abizaid said far more people are trying to hold Iraq together than are trying to tear it apart. "I think that there is a much greater chance that Iraq will emerge through this political process as a stable and modern state that is well represented in the community of nations as a responsible state," he said. "I am optimistic that we have a chance, but it is not a 100 percent chance."
The general said that as sovereignty nears, incidents of violence almost certainly will grow. "And it will be the mark of our success as to our willingness to stay the course and our ability to build Iraqi security institutions that are willing to fight for their own freedom and their own survival," he said. "At the end of the day, it will be Iraqis that make Iraq free, not Americans."
Abizaid has a number of challenges in his area of operations. In addition to operations in Iraq, he also commands troops involved in counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan and a joint task force operating in the Horn of Africa. He said commanders and troops in all three regions are facing difficult challenges caused by extremists. "Despite that, I'm very optimistic that we have the troops, the equipment, and the necessary will to fight our way through to a good conclusion, as we maintain our patience, our tenacity, and our courage," he said.
Private Mail to be added to or removed from the GNFI (or Pro-Coalition) ping list.
What is very strange is that we have sent Arafat $120,000,000 in the first two months of this year and are rushing another $20,000,000 bucks to them this month due to a "fiscal emergency".
The very people we are fighting with our troops in Iraq, we are funding at their base in Palestine! It is such a strange thing to do, I really do not understand what is going on.
The amount of money that the US has donated to Hamas, Hizbulla and Islamic Jihad through Arafat is equal to the entire Gross National Product of the PLO controlled Peusedo State before the intifada war began. That means Arafat could pay all salarys of the millions of Arabs himself just from the American donations and still have the greater portion of the Saudi and EU cash for his army's expansion and supply.
Now the State Department is not fools or ignorant, they have the Bank paper work captured by the Israeli Government showing the West Bank towns that Arafat is in control of is funding the terrorist infrastructure in Europe and America, some was even marked as payment to Suicide Bombers in the US. Since those attacks have not happened yet, it clearly shows that Arafat has placed agents inside the US. But still we fund them, and after Israel confiscated the funding for the American moles, the State Department declared the replacement money must be sent immediately.
Some one is playing both ends to a greater means. What is so important about keeping this terror war going that we are willing to spend billions fighting a war that we spend hundreds of millions paying people to fight?
The net result is this, we are going bankrupt, our military is even further depleted of supplies as we move our armies off shore, and we are invalidating the Constitution in the name of security we are paying to insure is kept threatened.
That this is what is happening all can see, but what is the motive for all this incredible con game? Why do we force Israel to harbor the HQ of world terrorism instead of just arresting Arafat for the killing of hundreds of Americans?
Something stinks in Washington.
How awful us Americans are, why we threaten to stop paying them just because they kill us. Down right extortion. We should be ashamed and give them even more money! Whats a self respecting terrorist to do? GET A JOB?!
Imagine that, having to say terrorism is bad for a paltry 1.3 Billion dollars or TWO YEARS OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT!
This is just one form of aid, billions of dollars are being funneled into the hands of Arafat in as many ways as can be to help hide the support of the Biggest terrorist State on the face of the earth.
Now check how many minutes it took me to search this stuff out. Not a hard job. You want to know what is going on? Follow the money...
Now goodnight, it is midnight here and I got to go to work in the morning, I do not have the fat tax wallet of Uncle Sam to feed from like the Pali's do. Must be rough getting paid twice what you can make in a year at a real job just for being "disadvantaged" by having to kill Jews for a living.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.