Posted on 03/01/2004 8:41:55 PM PST by anymouse
French and Swiss astronomers say they have detected the farthest galaxy ever observed, a glimmer that dates back to when the universe was still in its infancy.
The galaxy, dubbed Abell 1835 IR1916, is 13.23 billion light-years from Earth beating by a chunk another galaxy that until now was believed to be the farthest known object, said France's state-funded National Center for Scientific Research, a major European research organizations.
Because light from the new find took 13.23 billion years to reach us across the vastness of space, astronomers are seeing the galaxy as it was back then. The universe, believed to have started with the Big Bang some 13.7 billion years ago, would still have been in its infancy.
"It is as if we are seeing the childhood of the galaxy," Roser Pello, a member of the team that found it, told The Associated Press on Monday. "It's a galaxy that is starting to form."
The galaxy is in the Virgo constellation and, in space terms, is tiny. It is at least 10 times smaller than our own galaxy, the Milky Way, and has one ten-thousandth of its mass, said Daniel Schaerer of the Geneva Observatory, another member of the team.
He said the find lends weight to theories of how galaxies and stars first formed after the Big Bang, when space is thought to have exploded in a fraction of a second from a speck to an immensity bathed in heat and radiation. It took an estimated 300 million years for the universe to cool and for the stars to form from hydrogen and helium.
Theory holds "that at the start of the universe, galaxies were small, like a kind of basic building block," Schaerer said in a telephone interview.
"Afterward they started to fuse together," he added. "The universe was still quite compact and there were frequent meetings between different galaxies; the biggest swallowed the smaller ones and grew into big galaxies like our own."
Previously, the farthest-known galaxy, whose discovery was announced in mid-February, was roughly 13 billion light-years from Earth. That means light observed from there was emitted about 750 million years after the Big Bang, compared to a mere 470 million years for the new discovery.
To better understand that concept, try imagining the age of the universe in human terms. If the universe is a person aged 75, then the newly found galaxy dates back to when the universe was just "a baby aged two-and-a-half," the French national research center said in a statement.
Richard Ellis, a California Institute of Technology astronomer involved in the previous galaxy discovery, called the new find "potentially very exciting" but said he did not find the European researchers' evidence as convincing as his team's findings, which were made using the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope (news - web sites).
"If they are right, they found the earliest object," Ellis said. But he added that the European research was "not as secure as the measurements made with the Hubble."
"They don't have that clinching image," he said.
The new discovery was made using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, in Chile, with other images also coming from the Hubble Space Telescope and Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope on Mauna Kea, a dormant Hawaiian volcano, the center said.
Nature also played a magnifying role. The newly found galaxy lies behind a cluster of galaxies, named Abell 1835, whose gravitational forces helped to deflect the distant galaxy's light toward Earth and amplify it by at least 25 times.
The magnification process, first predicted by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, is known as "gravitational lensing."
"There is so much mass, galaxies, gases and dark matter gathered together in this cluster of galaxies that it deflects the light, acting as a lens," said Schaerer.
___
On the Web:
The European Southern Observatory:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-04-04.html
Schaerer's page: http://obswww.unige.ch/sfr
Sorry LTC, (hmm..License to carry; Lieutenant Col.? inquiring minds and all *cough*)...at any rate, I don't pretend to know this "stuff"..Only got turned on to it a couple years back. Figure in 20 years or so, my understanding will be enough as to make heads or tails of the math, let alone the philosohpy behind it.
I'm just glad the science grabbed me as it did...I love this reading and love the learning.
OK this "IF" brings on my comment....
So someone spots this galaxy and because they think the "Big Bang" happened around the same time, they think they have seen the farthest place away from us.
So what happens down the road when someone spots another galaxy beyond that? How do they date that galaxy if it's beyond the "Big Bang" time estimation?
Why not start the story out with, This is all just guess-work folks, but it's our best guess? Just my little comment/question.
FWIW, this classic Czech science fiction film is playing at the Museum of Modern Art later this month.
Perhaps it's better to ask IF rather than WHEN. The way you ask seems to assume astronomers will discover the universe is much older than current estimates.
Well sure "IF" would be appropriate, but the possibility of "WHEN" exists too. Who knows what technology will be developed down the road? That's what makes it all fun and interesting.
Are they sure? 'Cause you know sometimes things just look really really small when they are way far away. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.