1 posted on
02/27/2004 1:01:58 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Howlin; PhiKapMom; Mo1; onyx; hellinahandcart
ping
2 posted on
02/27/2004 1:02:50 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Heh. The Gipper's son comes out and puts the Unappeasables in their place. I have to agree with him 100%.
Qwinn
5 posted on
02/27/2004 1:07:57 AM PST by
Qwinn
To: kattracks
Amen! I am sick of conservatives dissing Bush. The Dems are INCREDIBLY fired up - if we all do not turn out on election day, we will face at least 4 years of a president that makes Clinton look like Reagan by comparison.
To: kattracks
THE CUSTER CONSERVATIVES: "Not Smart... But Principled, Dammit!" :)
13 posted on
02/27/2004 1:15:13 AM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: kattracks
Thanks, kattracks, terrific column and I hope Michael Reagan's argument convinced some of the folks around these here parts :-)
18 posted on
02/27/2004 1:22:41 AM PST by
Tamzee
(The Democrat Party...... Kerrying water for Communism since 1971)
To: kattracks
They are wearing blinders that only allow them to focus on one issue. They say they won't vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on one single issue even though he agrees with them on every other issue. It's utterly self-defeating. It's called having dementia, mental illness. It is a real, serious inability to understand and live in the real world, so they resort to living in a fantasy, delusional world.
There's not a dime's worth of difference between those on the left who spout stuff like "Bush planned 911" and those on the right who say things like "Bush is no different than Clinton, I'm not going to vote for him...".
To: kattracks
"Democrats in Congress have so regulated American companies that the cost of doing business has risen. Thats due to the unions and government regulations that have become so prohibitive"
This statement is the KEY to outsourcing. Whenever anybody moans about jobs being lost - there is your answer.
32 posted on
02/27/2004 1:37:08 AM PST by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: kattracks
Conservatives that stay home on election day or run to a dead party errrr. I mean 3rd party. Deserve every bit of annoyance and agony in which a president Kerry puts the through.
And I don't want to hear any kavetchin about it. But ou get the goverment you most deserve.
37 posted on
02/27/2004 1:53:06 AM PST by
Tempest
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="miserable_failure">)
To: kattracks
The President has to fight for his base. I believe this election will be decided on the basis of cultural issues. No I don't want to stay home in November. President Bush must do more to give me and millions of disaffected conservatives a reason to go out and vote for him. I believe he's done that by endorsing the age-old and timeless definition of marriage and the family under assault from our Cultural Left. He needs to recess appoint more conservative judges to send the Democrats a message and to support a bill to curb the jurisdiction of glue-sniffing liberal judges who want to take away our rights and freedoms. Those are the issues John F. Kerry and the Democrats fear. A second Bush term will happen once the President and Karl Rove work to rally the grass-roots to his side up until the end of the year.
41 posted on
02/27/2004 2:47:27 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
Great article! The "Unappeasables." That's exactly what these folks are.
Heck, I don't even agree 100% with myself half the time; I sure don't expect to agree 100% with the President. But I know that 90% or even less is a whole lot better than 0%, which is my level of agreement with any Dem.
52 posted on
02/27/2004 3:06:20 AM PST by
livius
To: kattracks
THE CUSTER CONSERVATIVES: "Don't make me think about the logical repercussions of allowing a pro-abortion, pro-tax, pro-liberal Supreme Court leftist whacko to the Presidency... I'm principled, dammit!"
57 posted on
02/27/2004 3:19:35 AM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: kattracks
How about the "Custer Conservative Talk Show Hosts"? Some of these guys, (I won't say which ones), are firing up the wing nuts extremists on the right endlessly with irrelevant issues, and frequently dissing Bush in sneaky ways. Not helping GWB's poll numbers at all.
58 posted on
02/27/2004 3:24:32 AM PST by
tkathy
(The liberal media: september 10th rhetoric in a september 11th world.)
To: kattracks
They keep leaving out the impact of the social engineering judges and the 2-3 Supreme Court Justices the next president will apoint. Which will have just as big an impact on our lives as the War on Terror.
60 posted on
02/27/2004 3:34:38 AM PST by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: kattracks
Yesterday Sean Hannity was speaking with George Will.
Sean spewed out his usual criticisms of the President's policies. Too much spending, medicare prescriptions, blah blah blah, education bill, more blah blah blah and then concluded with how important it will be to re-elect the President.
With friends like Sean and certain others, who needs enemies. We are doing the job for the media and the america haters.
64 posted on
02/27/2004 3:42:21 AM PST by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: kattracks
"the reason they are going to have to look overseas is because Democrats in Congress have so regulated American companies that the cost of doing business has risen." What have the republicans done to solve this problem?
66 posted on
02/27/2004 3:50:01 AM PST by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
To: kattracks
I remember a President named Ronald Reagan who did not try to make the left wing part of the right wing under the foolish big tent philosophy, rather, he was a straight shooter who tried to do what was right and good and just for the people and vetoed or signed legislation as he saw fit for the continuance of a just society. He may have been the best President in my lifetime and when George Bush was elected , I was hoping he might do likewise. He didn't and is a panderer to the left and they take advantage of his foolishness and then kick him in the butt. You would think he would learn but now I believe he won't. As a Christian conservative, I and the brethren know exactly what we have to lose and what we have to gain and we do stand on the the issues that are important for peace for all of us.
We shouldn't have to put a cloths pin on our nose when we vote and we should have a right wing president who is loyal to truth, justice and the right way for all people and not just another politician. Lately, America is being destroyed by neo communist liberals who love anarchy and are alway's lying to further their agenda, who will protect us from these monsters? George Bush? I don't know.
69 posted on
02/27/2004 3:59:07 AM PST by
wgeorge2001
(Pr. 8:36 36. But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death)
To: kattracks
They are wearing blinders that only allow them to focus on one issue. The person(s) with the blinders on is George Bush and the Republican party.
I have to laugh (bitterly) at the fools who say that we former GW supporters are just focusing on one or two little issues that aren't important.
If I have a job tomorrow whose wages are enough for me to pay my bills, that is damn important to me and my family!
If I keep this job or it goes to a slave labor camp in Red China or a PhD in India that makes 20 grand a year, it matters to me!
If President Bush's amnesty plan goes into effect and my company decides to cut my wages and benefits in half so my job becomes a "job no American wants" and former illegals are brought in to take over, it matters to me!
If my kids have a reason to go to college with the expectation of learning a profession that will ensure a decent, better than average life, that also matters!
The Republican party is so enslaved to big business interests that it is sickening. I'm sure every free traitor, Wall Street hustler and greedy CEO scumball in the country will vote for GW. And apparently that is the one and only interest group that President Bush and the GOP care about.
I have heard many Republicans on this board say that Mr. Bush doesn't need my vote and that is fine with me.
Seeing as how GW won the first time in such a huge landslide, /sarcasm go right ahead GOP, Rove, and GW, keep kicking working white and blue collar people in the nads and you will get what you deserve on election day!
Just tell me one more time how great it is when my middle class job gets outsourced or off-shored so some filthy rich CEO can buy three or four new mansions and I end up as a door greeter at the Great Wall-mart!
Yeah that ought to do it!
At least with a demoRat president the GOP would fight against their one world, socialist, liberal policies, unlike now when their own President leads them by the nose down the same leftest path.
To: kattracks
Say it ain't so!
73 posted on
02/27/2004 4:31:14 AM PST by
P.O.E.
(D@mned if you do, Dem'd if you don't)
To: kattracks
Conservatives Contemplate Electoral Hari-kiri Shouldn't that be 'hairy kerry'???????????
To: kattracks
Good post. Re-elect Bush and he'll tear down those Dim barriers to business. This will boos tour economy even further.
75 posted on
02/27/2004 4:34:38 AM PST by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson