Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Film May Harm Gibson's Career [H'wood Bigs vow revenge]
NY Times ^ | 2/26/2004 | SHARON WAXMAN

Posted on 02/25/2004 3:29:59 PM PST by SauronOfMordor

New Film May Harm Gibson's Career

By SHARON WAXMAN

Published: February 26, 2004

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 25 — Mel Gibson's provocative new film, "The Passion of the Christ," is making some of Hollywood's most prominent executives uncomfortable in ways that may damage Mr. Gibson's career.

Hollywood is a close-knit world, and friendships and social contact are critical in the making of deals and the casting of movies. Many of Hollywood's most prominent figures are also Jewish. So with a furor arising around the film, along with Mr. Gibson's reluctance to distance himself from his father, who calls the Holocaust mostly fiction, it is no surprise that Hollywood — Jewish and non-Jewish — has been talking about little else, at least when it's not talking about the Oscars.

Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen, the principals of DreamWorks, have privately expressed anger over the film, said an executive close to the two men.

The chairmen of two other major studios said they would avoid working with Mr. Gibson because of "The Passion of the Christ" and the star's remarks surrounding its release.

Neither of the chairmen would speak for attribution, but as one explained: "It doesn't matter what I say. It'll matter what I do. I will do something. I won't hire him. I won't support anything he's part of. Personally that's all I can do."

The chairman said he was angry not just because of what he had read about the film and its portrayal of Jews in relation to the death of Jesus, but because of Mr. Gibson's remarks defending his father, Hutton Gibson. Last week in a radio interview the elder Mr. Gibson repeated his contention that the Holocaust was "all — maybe not all fiction — but most of it is." Asked about his father's Holocaust denial in an interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC, the movie star told her to "leave it alone."

The other studio chairman, whose family fled European anti-Semitism before the Holocaust, was less emphatic but said, "I think I can live without him." But others said there would be no lasting backlash against Mel Gibson. "If the movie works, I don't think it will hurt him," said John Lesher, an agent with Endeavor. "People here will work with the anti-Christ if he'll put butts in seats." Mr. Lesher added, "He put his own money where his mouth is. He invested in himself."

As Mr. Lesher implied, Hollywood is also a place of businesspeople, and Mr. Gibson is a proven movie star, popular with audiences. There are few actors with that kind of bankability, no matter their personal views. Mr. Gibson is also a capable director. So some of the initial reactions to his film may fade over time.

Mr. Gibson not only directed and helped write the $30 million film, but he also paid for it, including production and marketing costs, out of his own pocket, which Hollywood has filled.

As an actor and successful director, from "Mad Max" (1979) through "Lethal Weapon" (1987) and its sequels to the Oscar-winning "Braveheart" (1995), Mr. Gibson has long been a Hollywood pet. But he has also been known as a prankster and a self-confessed abuser of various substances. Many in the relentlessly secular movie industry see his recent religious conversion — he practices a traditionalist version of Roman Catholicism — as another form of addiction.

Last Friday the media billionaire Haim Saban, former owner of the Fox Family Channel, sent a concerned e-mail message to friends about Mr. Gibson and his father.

The message forwarded an article by the journalist Mitch Albom calling on Mr. Gibson to repudiate his father's denial of the Holocaust. Mr. Saban sent the article to, among others, Roger Ailes, who heads Fox News; Norman Pattiz, who runs the Westwood One radio network; and Michael R. Milken, the securities felon turned philanthropist.

Amid the daily dealings of Hollywood, the film and the star have been fodder for unfavorable gossip. Dustin Hoffman has talked to friends about what he called Mr. Gibson's "strangeness" during the ABC interview. The producer Mike Medavoy said Mr. Gibson's religious zealotry made him feel uncomfortable. Mr. Hoffman is Jewish; Mr. Medavoy is the child of Holocaust survivors.

"One question is, `What propelled him to make the movie about the passion of Christ?' " Mr. Medavoy said. "It makes me a little squeamish. What makes me squeamish about religion in general is that people think they have the answer: `I think my God is the right God.' How do you argue against that?"




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: censorship; christ; gibson; hollywood; mediabias; mel; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-279 next last
To: SauronOfMordor
From the Word of God (KJV):

James 2:19

Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
181 posted on 02/25/2004 6:11:24 PM PST by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
I'd suggest avoiding the Mark Morford piece . . .
182 posted on 02/25/2004 6:13:39 PM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
"I don't think what he offered was a defense of his father, but an admonishment to Diane Sawyer that she shouldn't tread onto the turf of a father and son. Let's be honest. The left wants the son to denounce his father. No good son would ever do that."

Mel could say: "I don't share my father's views, in that area. That is all I will have to say on that topic. Next question, Diane."
183 posted on 02/25/2004 6:15:52 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Reading this, I remembered: Hollywood and the Times are always going off about blacklisting!!! Guess it depends whose ox is being gored.
184 posted on 02/25/2004 6:25:33 PM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Thank you for your kind reply, Miss Marple (kind, as opposed to the hateful, presumptuous and sanctimonious reply preceding yours.)

I remember, but I also try to disengage from the passions of the moment, and judge a movie like any other movie, that is like a movie. In forty years it will be seen as silly just as the biblical movie epics of 40 years ago are seen as silly today. Some things last, most don't. Written word lasts more often than a picture that leaves nothing to the imagination, as this movie does, according to most reviewers.

To my thinking, if God chose to speak to me through this one, as you seem to suggest, then God must also be choosing to speak to me through all the violent, pornographic movies Hollywood releases each week. I hope that is not is the case - man's free will, etc. The San Francisco Comical of all sources has a couple of interesting, unbiased, I think, reviews of this particular "entertainment vehicle", or "product", which you can see on sfgate.com.

185 posted on 02/25/2004 6:26:06 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack
"Can't wait to get to be presumably senile just so i can tell a few folks (in-laws) what i have always thought about 'em...it'll be ok cause i'm just a crazy old man. yee haw!!!"

LOL! Why wait? It is so much fun! That was always my fantasy as well! But you see, I just couldn't wait. So I am blaming it on midlife crisis. Although I am a mom of 5 and grandma of 1.5, I really think that my kids have driven me to the point that I have an extremely low tolerance for Bravo-Sierra and I tend to blurt things out without "filtering" them. For this reason (along with many more, LOL)I try to make one visit to my MIL per year. This is a gift to my dear husband, who does much less squirming at his folks house without me there. LOL! Take care and God bless!

186 posted on 02/25/2004 6:26:10 PM PST by Enough_Deceit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
The new Holocaust revisionists deny that the Slavs were targetted, and that 8 million non combatants died at Nazi hands.
187 posted on 02/25/2004 6:27:27 PM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
I have heard that most people who previewed the movie said they don't think they could see it a second time. I'll find out Saturday.
188 posted on 02/25/2004 6:28:05 PM PST by No Permission Needed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Enough_Deceit
Great post! And I can identify......there's something to be said about hitting your 40s....:)
189 posted on 02/25/2004 6:30:04 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Last week in a radio interview the elder Mr. Gibson

Correct me if I'm wrong but I heard that subject interview was held over a year ago, prior to any showing of the film and that he was ambushed by the radio station that did the interview under false pretenses......

190 posted on 02/25/2004 6:33:18 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (I've dealt with stupid people for over 32 years. Haven't I earned the right to just shoot them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
diane overstepped when she asked about his father and got smartly put in her place. Family is family - not many in the public eye "get" that anymore.
191 posted on 02/25/2004 6:33:53 PM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
We seldom buy modern movies..but we will be buying The Passion.
192 posted on 02/25/2004 6:35:30 PM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Huck Follywood
193 posted on 02/25/2004 6:37:19 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Don't be a Cameron Frye in a Ferris Bueller world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
The Slavs were not targetted for extermination, JUST tertiation. I believe that the Nazis wanted 1/3 killed, 1/3 expelled, and 1/3 enslaved.
This would have been a horrendous crime against humanity, but not genocide.
Few Slavic people were killed for racial reasons, although one could argue that German allocation of food that lead to much starvation was a form of targeted killing.

As for your numbers about 12-13 million people were killed of which ~6 million were Jews, ~300,00 where Gypsies, over 1 million other non-Slavs (political, religioes, effeminate homosexuals...) annd the remaining 4 to 5 million were Slavic people.

The reason why some JEws (foolishly) downplay this is because anti-Semitic revisionists play with the numbers to try to minimize Jewish deaths.

Frankly, if you want to talk about mass-murder of Slavs, Stalin wins by a factor of 10.
194 posted on 02/25/2004 6:38:19 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

195 posted on 02/25/2004 6:38:27 PM PST by John Lenin (Just because there is no draft does not mean there are no draft dodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Poor babies...they'll never forgive him for making a success out of this movie. We will be going to see it sometime next week.
My oldest (age 15) grandson is going this Saturday with his Church Group.
196 posted on 02/25/2004 6:39:11 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
I think in this case, the protesting Jews are practicing narcissists. The film is NOT about them. Everything does NOT have to be about them. I have championed Israel for years but they are definitely turning me off by their overreaction to this film.
197 posted on 02/25/2004 6:40:14 PM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
I'm very embarrassed when I see comments like this. It's horrifying.

I think they are threatened because if Mel starts spreading Christianity around, less people might pay to see these jokers' crap movies.

198 posted on 02/25/2004 6:41:43 PM PST by diotima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
There's some more of the good old liberal "tolerance" for ya!
199 posted on 02/25/2004 6:43:03 PM PST by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
No, he should do GK Chesterton's "Ballad of the White Horse", aka the story of Alfred the Great and the Danes. He was made for that story. Christianity all but snuffed out by an invading plague of cynical pagan vikings burning and pillaging everything they can find, down to a handful of men, comes roaring back in one last battle - at the end of which, the viking commander is so impressed at the spirit behind that kind of courage, he converts. Actually happened, look it up.
200 posted on 02/25/2004 6:49:12 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson