Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

L.A. Officers Kill Suspect as Viewers Watch on TV
TvSpy Shoptalk ^ | 2-25-2004 | Richard Winton and Kevin Pang

Posted on 02/25/2004 7:22:34 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: coloradan
The car backed up slowly and hit a police car. At the time, I don't think there were any police outside of their cars, as they were in pursuit. The police got out of their cars after the cars bumped, and about the same time the driver's door was opened.
21 posted on 02/25/2004 8:12:24 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I watched that live on Fox and friends!

I had no idea that shots were fired.

22 posted on 02/25/2004 8:14:53 AM PST by evets (Yins democrat jagoffs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
"I had no idea that any shots had been fired."

The perp seemed unimpressed as well.

One wonders how many times one has to be shown that the Parabellum, while lethal, just can't be relied on to stop the threat.

LAPD is transitioning to Glock as a duty pistol -- and the 21 will be allowed (though probably not issued). It will be interesting to see how many officers choose to qualify on that vs. the 17.
23 posted on 02/25/2004 8:16:04 AM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
The difference between a car going fast and one going slowly is only the gas pedal.
24 posted on 02/25/2004 8:22:29 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
If a car is "rolling slowly" toward you, it is getting closer to you. And if the accelerator is suddenly depressed without warning that car can become very deadly in a hurry.
25 posted on 02/25/2004 8:23:54 AM PST by Lancey Howard ("Slowly I turn, step by step, inch by inch......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
You have to see the tape to make that call. The car was attempting to make a uturn and ran out of space, so it backed up. The police car in pursuit was about 5 feet behind it at the time, and the perp backed into it slowly. There might have been some bumper damage, but it didn't look like a serious accident

If the perp had been a minority, we'd probably be seeing it replayed on TV incessantly and have rioting in the streets.

From my point of view the car backing up didn't pose any threat. However, the perp did pose a threat by trying to evade the cops for 90 minutes, driving the wrong direction, and driving thru a pedestrian walkway. As a result, he needed to be stopped. I don't know if excessive force was used, but I do know that the perp found out that crime doesn't pay.

26 posted on 02/25/2004 8:30:21 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Looks like the hiway patrol save a few bucks for the tax payers and save some lives [thumbs up to them]
27 posted on 02/25/2004 8:30:25 AM PST by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I'm not going to loose any sleep over one less thug prowling the streets but it does sound like the police have some splainin' to do.
28 posted on 02/25/2004 8:34:22 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Anyone got a video clip of the chase and ending...?

Wouldn't mind seeing for myself if they used poor judgement or not....

Thanks..
29 posted on 02/25/2004 8:36:59 AM PST by STFrancis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
It would take a split second to punch the accelerator.
30 posted on 02/25/2004 8:41:08 AM PST by ampat (to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: STFrancis

here is a link to the video


31 posted on 02/25/2004 8:43:53 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: STFrancis
Could you forward it to me also?


Thanx!
32 posted on 02/25/2004 8:44:28 AM PST by BayouCoyote (My vote will be decided on the AWB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
and here is a the link to the story that includes the video:

Wild Pursuit Ends in Barrage of Gunfire

33 posted on 02/25/2004 8:45:17 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
1. If a car is rolling slowly, someone can get out of the way. Since he was going slowly, it looks like he was trying to do a U-turn in a non-threateningnonthreatening way to the cops. If he accelerated or made the turn rapidly, ok, but he didn't.

It's obvious you've never had a job on the streets - as a law officer, EMT rescue, fireman, etc. Perhaps you should for your own education and service to your community.

Get over the term "slowly." If someone is trying to get a better shot, does it matter that they are moving their gun "slowly" over the target? No, it is the action that counts.

When a car driven by a suspect/perp moves after being told to stop, turn off the engine (there is a BIG reason for that command), and hold up their hands - EVERYONE in the area is in IMMEDIATE danger. It doesn't matter at what rate the suspect is moving the car - that the car is moving is the danger. Usually when a suspect begins to "slowly" move the car - they are doing two things.
One - they are beginning to really panic or have gone into the "zone" of where nothing matters anymore and it is time to take someone with them. Two - they are lining up the car for a better shot.
Either case is extremely dangerous and about to become worse in a hurry.

That better shot may mean a better way to run back into the streets to put someone else in danger but more often than not, the moving car usually means a suspect/perp has hit a point of uncontrolled violence. That slow moving car is going to head toward someone and could get real fast, in a big hurry. Someone is about to die. 2. Do you think a citizen, who saw a car roll SLOWLY toward toward him, could shoot to kill the driver and expect to be cleared of wrongdoing, because a slowly moving car is a deadly threat that merits deadly force? I don't.

It depends. Is that citizen able to get away and is the driver of the car slowly turning to get a bead on him before accelerating. The circumstances would decide. There have been cases of assault with a deadly weapon - a vehicle - in citizen cases.

But you are overlooking major differences.

A police officer's life is regularly assaulted as part of his job. The threat is higher than for the regular citizen. Thus, his latitude for reaction must be higher. No one is going to try to kill you today. But when a cop walks out the door in the morning, he knows someone is going to try.

Secondly, the area of responsibility is different. A citizen has only his own life to protect. A cop has his own life, his partner, the rest of the officers on scene, the people in the neighborhood, and the rest of the community should a violent suspect continue his crimes. In a situation such as the article describes, the scene and the suspect must be brought into immediate control - or there is an immediate threat to everybody in the area. Because the threat is not just to himself, but to the entire community, the officer again must have a wider latitude or reaction.

34 posted on 02/25/2004 8:46:31 AM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
I agree with you here.

A car can accelerate very quickly. If a fleeing suspect has been told to stop, switch off the engine, and get out of the car, and he doesn't, then starts backing towards the cops - they can't wait to see if he's intending to hit the gas and run over them, because if he did, they'd be dead.

I had a friend who had both her legs and her pelvis fractured by a VERY slow speed collision in a high school parking lot. (Somebody backed out of a parking space without looking.) The sound of the broken bones grinding together as she tried to stand up is something I will NEVER forget.

35 posted on 02/25/2004 8:53:28 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

36 posted on 02/25/2004 8:54:42 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
" he was supposed to come home last night."

Yea, but he was out workin' w/o a permit.

37 posted on 02/25/2004 8:58:22 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
If a fleeing suspect has been told to stop, switch off the engine, and get out of the car, and he doesn't, then starts backing towards the cops - they can't wait to see if he's intending to hit the gas and run over them, because if he did, they'd be dead.

Thank you - that's an important point to remember. Plus if the suspect follows the commands and shuts off the engine, and gets his hands up, nothing happens. No bullets fired. Nobody gets hurt.

I had a friend who had both her legs and her pelvis fractured by a VERY slow speed collision in a high school parking lot. (Somebody backed out of a parking space without looking.) The sound of the broken bones grinding together as she tried to stand up is something I will NEVER forget.

Yep, been there - done that. I was one of guys that had to get her on the backboard, stabilize her, run a line if necessary, and get to the ER in a hurry. Many people don't realize how much force is involved in a "slow" car. But now, I wait in the ER for the patient to come to me - less messy. :-)

There's still a bad moment when the one brought in is a cop. It's a shared moment of one of the team going down.

38 posted on 02/25/2004 9:10:37 AM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
I agree with your points. The police should be given more latitude for the reasons you sited but with that additional latitude come a higher standard. If I shot someone in a similar situation, no doubt I'm going to jail. In a case like this, as you so well pointed out, the police have the added burden of protecting innocents if the guy continues his flight. I think that is their best justification. The guy backing his car into a police vehicle at such slow speed as happened her in my mind doesn't quite make the case. I do agree they were right to prevent him from fleeing. The only Monday morning quarterback thought that comes to my mind and will probably have to be addressed in the investigation would be the option of blasting out a couple of tires, which it seems here may have been an option. Nonetheless, overall, I'm with the LEO on this one.
39 posted on 02/25/2004 9:11:08 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Why did they have to shoot him so many times?" asked Emma Jean Killinger

Why didn't they just shot him once in the right leg so he couldn't work the accelerator or better still, shoot the steering wheel off the car.

40 posted on 02/25/2004 9:14:39 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson