Skip to comments.
Why young women are exposing themselves: Part two
townhall.com ^
| 2/24/04
| Dennis Prager
Posted on 02/23/2004 9:17:37 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
02/23/2004 9:17:37 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Apparently Obviuosly, Prager has way too much free time on his hands.
To: hole_n_one
Obviuosly s/b Obviously
To: kattracks
bump for later
4
posted on
02/23/2004 9:25:51 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
To: kattracks
blah blah blah...did he mention it was for attention?
5
posted on
02/23/2004 9:27:30 PM PST
by
Diva Betsy Ross
(Every heart beats true for the red ,white and blue!)
To: kattracks
Were there any photos with this article?
6
posted on
02/23/2004 9:28:27 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(DEFUND PBS & NPR - THE AMERICAN PRAVDA)
To: kattracks
Don't know why, just thankful.
7
posted on
02/23/2004 9:29:55 PM PST
by
breakem
To: kattracks
He left out the oldest reason in the world.
8
posted on
02/23/2004 9:33:22 PM PST
by
HAL9000
To: kattracks
Must be "sweeps week" at TownHall.com.
9
posted on
02/23/2004 9:34:13 PM PST
by
Ichneumon
To: kattracks
You know, I never thought I'd write this but I'm getting tired of going to the mall and seeing plumber's butt on 19-years old girls (often accompanied by a tattoo). It's just the wrong thing at the wrong place.
To: kattracks
As a result, the normal check on a woman flaunting her body is gone. A woman can reveal her breasts or cross her short-skirted legs near a man, but he is forbidden to say so much as, "You have great legs." In fact, he can be fired or sued for saying nothing and merely "staring."How Orwellian.
To: kattracks
Which two parts are they exposing?
12
posted on
02/23/2004 9:36:02 PM PST
by
AFreeBird
(your mileage may vary)
To: hole_n_one
All this really proves is that those religious are obsessed with sex; and probably more so than most.
I'd call it a deprecation of sexuality syndrome.
13
posted on
02/23/2004 9:39:37 PM PST
by
thinktwice
(The human mind is blessed with reason, and to waste that blessed mind is treason.)
To: kattracks
Who cares about WHY?
I just want to know WHERE!
14
posted on
02/23/2004 9:42:18 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
LMAO!
To: Luis Gonzalez
Nice! My sentiments exactly. :)
16
posted on
02/23/2004 9:55:55 PM PST
by
qxc172
To: kattracks
"History fails to record a single precedent in which nations subject to moral decay have not passed into political and economic decline. There has been either a spiritual awakening to overcome the moral lapse, or a progressive deterioration leading to ultimate national disaster." -- General Douglas MacArthur
17
posted on
02/23/2004 9:56:08 PM PST
by
hosepipe
To: kattracks
The traditional role of women empowered them? Being paid less than a man for the same work (which was common before the 1970's) is empowering? A woman with no job skills and little education other than housework is empowered? The women dependent on a husband who cheats on her and even gives her VD is empowered? A woman who can't flee a husband who beats her up because the powers that be won't let her is empowered? This is not one of the better articles posted on this otherwise excellent website. Everyone should read an article thoroughly before posting it.
To: kattracks
read later
To: hole_n_one
Dennis is right on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson