Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RALLY REPORT - Kaloogian and Tancredo ROCK Republican Convention in California!
Howard Kaloogian for U.S. Senate ^ | 02/22/2004 | Me

Posted on 02/22/2004 11:15:39 AM PST by Impeach98

WOW!


COngressman Tom Tancredo (Left), U.S. Senate Candidate Howard Kaloogian (R) (Center), and KSFO AM 560 Talk Show Host Melanie Morgan (Right)

Yesterday's rally against giving drivers' licenses to illegal aliens (as proposed by Democrat Gil Cedillo's SB1160 which Repub. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger says he supports) was a H U G E success.

The rally planning had been going on for several weeks. It was set to take place Saturday, February 21st at the Burlingame Hyatt, where the California Republican Party Convention would be taking place.

Since Governor Schwarzenegger has said he thinks giving drivers' licenses to illegal aliens is a "fantastic" and "excellent idea" (after he made conservatives very happy by repealing an existing law by Gil Cedillo that Gray Davis had signed that did the same), the thinking was that Arnold would get the message when Republicans turned out to say "WE DON'T WANT IT - NEITHER DOES CALIFORNIA."

The location had to be changed a couple times because officials with the California Republican Party establishment were offended that Kaloogian has rallied Republicans to oppose Bush's amnesty/guest-worker plan and Schwarzenegger's "sell out" on the illegal alien drivers' license plan.

With Kaloogian's opponents for U.S. Senate uncomfortable with challenging either the Bush plan or the Schwarzenegger-backed plan (they will speak to vague policy but not these specific proposals for fear of alienating Bush or Schwarzengger and their establishment suppport), the rally united immigration reform advocates and Kaloogian campaign supporters.

A little after 10:00 AM people began gathering outside, right in front of the Hyatt Hotel. Kaloogian for Senate staffers and volunteers were handing out Kaloogian signs, bumper stickers and lapel stickers.

People were simultaneously streaming towards the Kaloogian for Senate table inside of the convention and were being directed to join the now-growing crowd outside.

At the same time, last minute preparations were taking place at a giant tented pavillion located next to the hotel's pool at the back of the hotel complex. A stage with blue-curtain backdrop and "Kaloogian for Senate" wall would serve as the dais. Approximately one-dozen Kaloogian volunteers were assisting in the set-up effort. People seeking out the rally location began arriving at this location too.

By 10:20 AM things were crazy!!! There was now a crowd of a few hundred people outside that was growing fast. More and more people were running up to the Kaloogian table inside the hotel to find out the rally location and at the poolside pavillion (site of the rally) supporters were being directed to join the crowd at the front of the hotel.

Melanie Morgan and Donald LaCombe of the Kaloogian campaign were now firing up the crowd with chants over a megaphone. There were a handful of reporters and cameras covering the mass of people out front who were shouting "Enough is Enough," "No License for Illegals," and "Stop Them at the Border."

Finally at 10:30 AM, with the crowd now a giant sea of people, completely fired up, we opened the front doors to the hotel and Melanie Morgan chanting "Enough is Enough" into a megaphone led the procession of people through the hotel, down one of the main corridors to the back of the hotel where the crowd would exit, walk the pathway towards the poolside pavillion and assemble for the rally.

A number of interesting things took place. First, the procession passed right by the press room and reporters were shocked to see this massive and boisterous gathering of people streaming through the hotel screaming and chanting. Also, liberal Republican Vice Chair of the CRP, Mario Rodriguez, was conducting a seminar teaching Repubs. how to reach out to Latino voters and was horrified to see the protest march... apparently he is unable to distinguish between the difference of "illegal" individuals and legal citizens of the United States.

The throng of people was so wide, two sets of double-doors had to be opened to allow the crowd to flow in. But then the final mass of people who had gathered in the lobby in front of the Kaloogian for Senate booth formed a third 'feeder' stream to the procession. There were so many people now marching towards the rally location in the back that people could not enter the rally tent fast enough... we had a human traffic jam and this 10 foot wide hallway that runs several hundred feet was now completely jam-packed with participants.

People contiued streaming into the giant tent and tried to squeeze in to allow as many people as possible in. But there were so many people that not everyone could fit... there were dozens of people flowing out the side entrance, straining to see over the heads of those inside, and an even larger group of people at the back end of the tent who could not get in because of the overflow crowd.

Melanie Morgan and Brian Sussman of KSFO AM 560 - San Francisco were the emcees and had the crowd fired up... it wasn't hard. The energy in the room was electrifying. They introduced Kaloogian who received a hero's welcome from the crowd.

Kaloogian was on fire and delivered one of the best speeches I've heard him give on the stump so far. And the crowd responded with passion and energy. The tent was rocking folks!!

Just as Kaloogian was finishing his remarks, we got word that Tancredo was arriving in the back entrance (having been picked up by one of our Kaloogian staffers at the SFO airport). So Kaloogian then transitioned into welcoming Congressman Tom Tancredo, a hero to our cause, just as the Congressman entered the facility.

The place exploded.

Tancredo bounded up to the stage and grabbed Kaloogian's fist. They raised their hands into the air - pumping up and down. The crowd was hooting, hollering, screaming, chanting. Melanie Morgan and Brian Sussman were up there on stage still and were themselves cheering and beaming from ear to ear. It was a moment of magic and the energy was incredible.

Now during all of this time there was this steady stream of television camera crews arriving. While we had worked the media over pretty heavily to tell them about the rally, and who would be there, they had been dismissive. They weren't interested in covering a bunch of right-wing kooks complaining about immigration policies. So at the start of the rally we only had a handful of print reporters, 4 or 5 television cameras and 2 or 3 radio reporters. But by the end of the rally news organizations, learning of what was happening, had rushed over scores of additional reporters, camera crews, and microphone-carrying radio techs and reporters.

Tancredo gave a great speech. He explained that a series of events had led to him almost not making it. Delayed flights, cancelled flights, being held up on the tarmac, having to change connecting flights and airline carrier. Everything was a mess and a mass frustration (he was supposed to arrive at 9:30 AM so we could get him settled, instead he didn't make it until about 10:55 AM).

Tancredo told this story and explained that he would go through this kind of hassle every single day between now and Election Day if this would help to elect Howard Kaloogian to the U.S. Senate.

Again, the crowd exploded.

Tancredo went on to explain during his speech that he had NOT ONE immigration reform friendly member in the U.S. Senate... and that without an ally in the Senate to join him in leading the charge on the immigration issue that we could not bring about the change in our failed policies that we need.

Tancredo was funny, gracious, passionate and simple but eloquent. At the end of his speech he again urged those in attendance to go to work to get Kaloogian elected to the Senate and announced he'd be doing all he could till Election Day to propel Kaloogian to victory. Tancredo and Kaloogian raised arms again and the crowd cheered and the camera flashbulbs flashed.

Tancredo and Kaloogian webt out back for a press conference/media avail.

Over the course of the next 45 minutes, Mike Spence, Founder of "Save Our License" (the group that collected signatures to repeal the original drivers' license for illegal aliens bill, SB60), Rick Oltman of FAIR, Ron Prince - author of Prop 187 and Proponent of Save 187 all addressed the crowd.

Crowd estimates have varied. I heard one person say 600-800 but I think this was high. Maybe 500-550.

All the press reports have said several hundred people.

Realize that there were only 1400 delegates listed for the CRP convention, so maybe 1200 were actually at the Hyatt. But while Marin and Jones could generate rallies of 50-75 people, Kaloogian had a massive crowd of cheering and raucous supporters who would then linger throughout the convention for the rest of the day - wearing Kaloogian t-shirts, carrying Kaloogian signs and bumper stickers.

It was an awesome day!



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; aar; alien; aliens; cedillo; cralosers; drivers; electionussenate; howard; illegal; immigrantlist; immigration; kaloogian; ksfo; license; melanie; morgan; mrninepercent; sb1160; tancredo; votebilljones; zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-371 last
To: tame; hchutch; FairOpinion
Spoken like a true Rino who is not the brightest bulb in the box.

Actually, you're the "Rino." You reject a candidate you agree with 50% in favor of electing a candidate you disagree with 100%. You reject the GOP unless it conforms perfectly to your wishes.

You reserve the right to walk out and not support the GOP when the nominee isn't to your liking--to the point, I guess, of using GOP walking-around money to derail a GOP candidate you dislike--yet demand complete fealty from those Republicans who MIGHT disagree with you (or dislike your habit of vile personal attacks) if your candidate happens to win the primary.

Loyalty is a two-way street. You are unwilling--or unable--to show any loyalty outward from yourself, yet demand absolute loyalty inward to yourself. It is a sign of a profound spirtual sickness. I am profoundly grateful that you did not serve in the USMC: you might have decided to not cover the flank of the man next to you if he was a less-than-pure conservative like you.

If Kaloogian wins, I'm going to work extremely hard to get him elected. That's what's known as "loyalty." Call me a "Rino" all you wish, if that will make you feel morally superior to me.

But you will, if your candidate doesn't win, simply pick up a knife and give everyone else a stab in the back.

Whine about Ed Zschau having been a RINO all you want. Senator Zschau would have voted to confirm Robert Bork as a Justice of the United States Supreme Court in 1987. We might not have gotten David Souter on the court had Bork not been successfully Borked. But you and your ilk decided that Alan Cranston would be the one to cast that vote, and he voted to not confirm Bork.

You, sir, are the RINO.

361 posted on 02/26/2004 5:37:02 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Then you have no claim on the GOP whatsoever, and no claim to being part of the "base." A wise GOP strategist would simply discount your vote at the outset, because you are unreliable.

Assuming someone is not considered part of the base, do you really believe the rest of this above?

By the political strategist's calculus, Bush has been extremely stupid, giving conservatives much of what they want even after they backstabbed him in 2000. Time will tell if the "My way or f***ing else" conservatives respond positively to Bush's outreach--or if they will remain true to form.

What percentage of conservatives "backstabbed" Bush in 2000?

What were the gross numbers of conservatives voted for Bush, and didn't?


362 posted on 02/26/2004 5:44:03 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
What percentage of conservatives "backstabbed" Bush in 2000?

4,000,000 no-show conservatives relative to 1996--newsflash kids, BOB DOLE got more conservative votes than Bush ever did--translates to about a 4% shift in the popular vote, and about 9-10% of the total conservative vote.

When I was a Marine, we always spoke of "The 10% who screw up a good deal for everybody else."

Bush managed to win in spite of our 10%. Now, the 10% want to give Boxer a third term--and screw it up for everybody else.

363 posted on 02/26/2004 5:53:17 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah


4,000,000 no-show conservatives relative to 1996--newsflash kids, BOB DOLE got more conservative votes than Bush ever did--translates to about a 4% shift in the popular vote, and about 9-10% of the total conservative vote.

So, 4 million would be 10% of 40 million, right?

If 90% of the 40 million conservatives voted for Bush, that's about 36 million votes, by my math. Agreed?

Also, do you really hold that a "wise GOP strategist would simply discount (a non-base) vote at the outset, because (it is) unreliable?"


364 posted on 02/26/2004 6:01:04 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; hchutch; FairOpinion
Also, do you really hold that a "wise GOP strategist would simply discount (a non-base) vote at the outset, because (it is) unreliable?"

A wise campaign manager would treat any such votes that his candidate did manage to get as a bonus, and not plan on winning an election with them.

Here's the issue: those "RINOs" you complain about actually vote, and do so on a consistent basis.

Conservatives are accurately seen as being less likely to vote, or to vote Republican, than "RINOs."

Satisfying the last 10% of the self-proclaimed base would probably cost at least 10% of the popular vote--in other words, the GOP candidate would lose roughly 2.5 votes for each vote gained.

You want to get your way more often? Generate votes, and do so reliably. Get the GOP candidate to owe you favors. You want to occasionally throw an election to a radical leftist Democrat? Keep doing as you've been doing. But don't expect the GOP to continuously prostrate themselves before you and beg the favor of your vote. They will find other people to vote for them.

As I've pointed out, I'm not in the business of building coalitions of the unwilling. Having been slow-rolled and back-stabbed by the self-proclaimed "true conservatives" one time too many, I refuse to trust anyone who regards loyalty to others as optional.

And yes, Saber, I am talking about you in the above paragraph.

365 posted on 02/26/2004 6:11:08 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; hchutch
A wise campaign manager would treat any such votes that his candidate did manage to get as a bonus, and not plan on winning an election with them.

Seems to me as long as I've been watching elections that campaign strategists spend a fair amount of time appealing to swing voters, which are unreliable by definition.

Here's the issue: those "RINOs" you complain about actually vote, and do so on a consistent basis.

You just said, if I understand the math of your numbers correctly, that 36 million conservatives voted for Bush in 2000, out of a total of 50,456,002.

So, the 4 million no shows notwithstanding, more than 70% of Bush's base are conservatives. Yet you said at #359, "by the political strategist's calculus, Bush has been extremely stupid, giving conservatives much of what they want even after they backstabbed him in 2000."

How can you say that "Bush has been extremely stupid" to tend to the conservatives in the GOP coalition, which make up 70% of his base?

Marine slogans are nice, but do you really think it would be wise to ignore those 36 million loyal conservatives just to stick it to the 4 million no shows, who are winnable in any case?

Satisfying the last 10% of the self-proclaimed base would probably cost at least 10% of the popular vote--in other words, the GOP candidate would lose roughly 2.5 votes for each vote gained.

Source? Link?

You want to get your way more often? Generate votes, and do so reliably.

70% of the base is "unreliable?"

You want to occasionally throw an election to a radical leftist Democrat? Keep doing as you've been doing.

Voting for Republicans?

But don't expect the GOP to continuously prostrate themselves before you and beg the favor of your vote. They will find other people to vote for them.

Sounds like you're saying "my way or f***ing else."

Nahhh... being an American, I reserve the right to criticize my political "betters." Also, I don't honestly think that political strategists are as quick as you'd like them to be to throw away votes that are theirs to lose.

As I've pointed out, I'm not in the business of building coalitions of the unwilling. Having been slow-rolled and back-stabbed by the self-proclaimed "true conservatives" one time too many, I refuse to trust anyone who regards loyalty to others as optional.

And yes, Saber, I am talking about you in the above paragraph.

I'll probably get over it. Don't know if hchutch will.

I'm much the same way, btw. I don't trust politicians who are disloyal to what I believe are in the best interests of the country, or who think loyalty is a one way street.


366 posted on 02/26/2004 6:40:14 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Poohbah
Seeing as I consider John Warner to be one of those "my way or f***ing else types" who DID backstab someone he did not agree with - I don't think Poohbah has much to worry about.
367 posted on 02/26/2004 8:04:42 PM PST by hchutch ("I never get involved with my own life. It's too much trouble." - Michael Garibaldi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Seeing as I consider John Warner to be one of those "my way or f***ing else types" who DID backstab someone he did not agree with - I don't think Poohbah has much to worry about.

Yeah, it's different when you do it.

Funny thing, though... you apparently value loyalty to party above all other loyalties.

While I also value loyalty to party, and have practiced it at the ballot box more than you have, it is not my supreme loyalty.


368 posted on 02/26/2004 8:12:34 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"Actually, you're the "Rino." You reject a candidate you agree with 50% in favor of electing a candidate you disagree with 100%."

====

Your entire post is 100% accurate, you told them, like it is.

These "unapeasables" are correctly termed "useful idiots" for the Democrats, because that's whom they help, when you look at the bottom line.

369 posted on 02/26/2004 10:15:14 PM PST by FairOpinion ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Poohpooh, You might want to save your empty R.I.N.O. rhetoric for someone who'se gullable enough to fall for it. That would not be me. GOOOOOO KALOOGIAN!
370 posted on 02/27/2004 1:32:45 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Impeach98
Your entire post is 100% accurate, you told them, like it is.

Spoken like another true Rino.

371 posted on 02/27/2004 1:34:27 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-371 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson