Skip to comments.
Lockyer rejects halt to nuptials He dismisses governor's as a political ploy (CA RATS ALERT)
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 2/21/04
| Nanett Asimov & Ryan Kim
Posted on 02/21/2004 10:55:37 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
State Attorney General Bill Lockyer on Saturday rebuffed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's demand that he force an end to San Francisco's same-sex marriages, calling the directive political rhetoric.
"The governor can direct the Highway Patrol. He can direct the next 'Terminator 4' movie if he chooses. But he can't direct the attorney general in the way he's attempted to do," Lockyer said, adding that Schwarzenegger's written directive "was a statement designed for consumption at the Republican convention."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: anarchy; anarchyinamerica; civilunion; culturewar; deliverusfromevil; democrats; gaymirage; genderneutralagenda; homosexualagenda; leftagenda; leftsagenda; lockyer; marriage; prisoners; rats; romans1; schwarzeneggar; schwarzenegger; sf; spiritualbattle; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-418 next last
Here we go. Lockyer is a RAT. He's not going to end gay marriages, won't uphold the RULE OF LAW.
This is Al Gore 2000 all over again.
To: little jeremiah; PoisedWoman
ping - alert alert
2
posted on
02/21/2004 10:56:09 PM PST
by
I_Love_My_Husband
(Borders, Language, Culture, Straights - now more than ever)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Just great. Does anyone in California beleive in following the laws anymore?
4
posted on
02/21/2004 10:58:16 PM PST
by
scarface367
(This tagline known to the state of California to cause cancer in laboratory animals)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Lockyer should be disbarred for refusing to uphold the law as it exists in the books. PERIOD.
As for the justices who keep enabling these lawbreakers, they too should face the axe and disbarrment.
5
posted on
02/21/2004 10:58:21 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Arrest Lockyer for obstruction of justice. Maybe his second in command will be more amenable to carrying out the law.
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Lockyer called that statement "preposterous" and said it is the kind of "exaggerated, hot rhetoric" that risks stirring people up to commit hate crimes. Lockyer would not be so lax about this if a mayor were giving out guns, now would he?
Funny, but there is a Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms. There is no Constitutional Right to buggery.
Lockyer is playing politics with our laws. I can only hope the Governor will have the stones to terminate his position.
7
posted on
02/21/2004 11:00:23 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
He can direct the National Guard.
8
posted on
02/21/2004 11:00:38 PM PST
by
Husker24
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: I_Love_My_Husband
The fix is in, both at the judicial and AG levels. California is intended to be the trendsetter for gay marriage, as it is the trendsetter for everything else.
10
posted on
02/21/2004 11:01:27 PM PST
by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
To: William Creel
You can't impeach the AG. You can recall him, though.
11
posted on
02/21/2004 11:02:33 PM PST
by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: I_Love_My_Husband
This is beyond vile. Is there any legal remedy available for this malfeasance?
To: I_Love_My_Husband
a GAY Superior Court judge decided on Friday not to impose a temporary restraining order on the city to halt the marriages
14
posted on
02/21/2004 11:03:20 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: Prime Choice
The governor can't terminate the AG or his position. He is an elected official. You cann recall him, though.
15
posted on
02/21/2004 11:03:42 PM PST
by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
To: Publius
California is intended to be the trendsetter for gay marriage, as it is the trendsetter for everything else. I think Lockyer just threw California to Bush in November.
16
posted on
02/21/2004 11:04:12 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Under another scenario, Grodin said, the issue might jump to the federal level if another state questioned its obligation to recognize same-sex marriages authorized in California or Massachusetts. "One way or the other, the issue of gay marriage is likely to reach the U.S. Supreme Court," he said.
So much for this being limited to a states' rights issue (not that I believed that).
Ahh, the smell of anarchy wafting off the Pacific.
To: William Creel
The California Supreme Court will uphold the law, certainly. Then it will be appealed to the US Supreme Court. We'll see how that one turns out.
18
posted on
02/21/2004 11:05:44 PM PST
by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Ok research time. Under CA law, can the Gov. do anything to direct the AG? It makes ZERO sense for that to be the case. Prosecutors are part of the executive. The AG should also be part of the executive and answer to the governor.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-418 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson