Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County to issue same-sex marriage licenses (NEW MEXICO TODAY 2/20/04)
AP via News Channel 15 wane.com ^ | 2/20/2004

Posted on 02/20/2004 9:55:00 AM PST by cyncooper

Bernalillo, New Mexico-AP -- A county clerk in New Mexico says it has nothing to do with "politics or morals."

Sandoval County Clerk Victoria Dunlap says the county plans to issue marriage licenses for same-sex couples.

She made the decision after asking for an opinion from the county attorney, who said New Mexico law isn't clear on the issue. He also says refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples could open the county to legal action.

State law defines marriage as a civil contract between contracting parties. It doesn't mention gender.

The issue of gay marriage has stirred controversy in other states. San Francisco granted hundreds of same-sex marriage licenses in defiance of California state law.

And lawmakers in Massachusetts expect to resume a debate on a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: anarchy; anarchyinamerica; attackonthefamily; civilizationattacked; civilunion; culturalsuicide; culturewar; democratsagenda; genderneutralsociety; homosexual; homosexualagenda; hysteria; lawlessness; leftsagenda; marriage; marriageunderassault; newmexico; pandorasbox; prisoners; romans1; ruleoflaw; samesexmarriage; spiritualbattle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last
To: Hotdog
keep them...don't want to be around them and with any luck they will increase the Aids outbreak in the "communities" and desolve themselves quicker...

Nice attitude.... Bigot.

81 posted on 02/20/2004 11:06:39 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
(s)The Democrat Party, join us for your inner homosexual.(/s)
82 posted on 02/20/2004 11:06:58 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Nice take on your part. Typical Dumbocrat duplicity, eh?
83 posted on 02/20/2004 11:07:19 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Out of control. Bush needs to get out front and make this the main issue of his campaign. He will win if he runs on the Marriage Ammendment.
84 posted on 02/20/2004 11:07:54 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Ach

roge = rogue

Blame sticky keyboard
85 posted on 02/20/2004 11:08:00 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: templar
A sheep is property.

Ah, true... but a gay man's gay brother?

86 posted on 02/20/2004 11:09:26 AM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: gawd
"look y'all, several thousand gay couples are already married and the world didn't end.. maybe it just ain't such a big deal."



Thousands of people are raped and tortured every year too...guess you would say "that ain't such a big deal...?"
...After all..the world didn't change...
87 posted on 02/20/2004 11:09:28 AM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: gawd
Your right the world want end. It will just be one more inch removed from where, and what we used to be. The time for, "cant we just all get along" is over.
88 posted on 02/20/2004 11:09:43 AM PST by barkingdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
OK, dear, set aside the issue at hand and just address roge "officials" circumventing of the law in conjunction with sneeky tactics.

did you miss the part of the article that said: State law defines marriage as a civil contract between contracting parties. It doesn't mention gender.

89 posted on 02/20/2004 11:10:17 AM PST by gawd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
What an idiotic comparison... rapes and tortures are a violation of an individual right... gay marriage violates nobody's individual right. Try again.
90 posted on 02/20/2004 11:10:53 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Thanks!
91 posted on 02/20/2004 11:11:00 AM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes. They're only "rogue" until the activist judicial system comes in and thwarts the will of the people. The merits of the issue of gay marriage are the bigger battleground.
92 posted on 02/20/2004 11:11:01 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Don't need too...already made my point...
93 posted on 02/20/2004 11:11:45 AM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
I love the extreme leaps of logic that some people make.

Today's extreme is tomorrow's next norm.

I loved that line, too.

94 posted on 02/20/2004 11:12:57 AM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"State law defines marriage as a civil contract between contracting parties. It doesn't mention gender."

What a stretch. The word, 'marriage,' is already legally defined as a union between a man and a woman. Time to flatten these suckers out by pounding them in the head with Webster's Unabridged and Black's Law Dictionary.

Hey, New Mexico! What idiot is in charge of this state? 'Contracting parties,' wanting to MARRY must be male and female -- one of each. I can't believe I pay taxes to pay these crazies.

95 posted on 02/20/2004 11:15:07 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gawd
Why, no! No I did not miss that.
96 posted on 02/20/2004 11:18:19 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
(Adult)Brother/sister, father/adult daughter? Polygamy?

How 'bout those as better analogies for adults legally capable of entering into a contract but are banned by law.
97 posted on 02/20/2004 11:21:15 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
banned by law of getting married, that is.
98 posted on 02/20/2004 11:22:17 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
ABQ Journal article below:

Friday, February 20, 2004
Sandoval County To Allow Same-Sex Nuptials
By Joshua Akers Journal Staff Writer

New Mexico's same-sex couples wanting to marry need look no further than Sandoval County. "At this point, my office is not aware of anything that would prohibit issuing marriage licenses for same-sex couples," Sandoval County Clerk Victoria Dunlap said Thursday. Dunlap said she made the decision after asking for a county attorney's opinion.
Same-sex marriages have been banned in 38 states. But Sandoval County attorney David Mathews said New Mexico law isn't clear on the issue and he was concerned that refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples could open the county to legal liability.
< snip>
Clerks in Santa Fe and Bernalillo counties say they would not issue same-sex marriage licenses. The state Attorney General's Office has never been asked for an opinion on the issue, said Sam Thompson, spokeswoman for Attorney General Patricia Madrid. Under state law, marriage is defined as a civil contract between contracting parties. It does not mention gender. "Each couple desiring to marry in New Mexico shall obtain a license from the County Clerk ... " reads NMSA 40-1-10. The only statute that mentions gender is a 1961 act that created the form used for marriage licenses. It asks for information about the male applicant and the female applicant. But the Equal Rights Act of 1973 outlaws discrimination based on sex, Mathews said.
Sandoval's Dunlap said she asked for Mathews' opinion after a person called asking about same-sex ceremonies earlier this week. The clerk's office doesn't perform marriage ceremonies but does issue about 50 marriage licenses a month. A license costs $25.
"If a couple applies, grant it," Mathews said. "From a practical point of view, you have to. There is nothing that just says man and woman." However, he said that he didn't want Sandoval County to become a test case for same-sex marriage in New Mexico and that the county doesn't have a position on the issue. "This is a statewide issue, and we need some guidance."
Santa Fe County Clerk Rebeca Bustamante turned down a same-sex couple who applied for a license in 1997 because of the 1961 act. "My position is I took an oath to uphold the law, not change the law," Bustamante said Thursday. "I wouldn't do it because I just don't think I can."
Bernalillo County Clerk Mary Herrera said her office has no plans to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Herrera cited the 1961 act as well. The recent publicity over the issue has prompted some people to call her office asking about the local policy, she said. "We're telling them we would not issue them here," Herrera said. Bernalillo County Attorney Tito Chavez said that he would need to review any recent changes in the law but that "it would probably be my advice not to issue them."
Randy Van Vleck, general counsel for the New Mexico Municipal League, said his organization hasn't dealt with the issue. "This issue has not come before us yet," he said. "It probably will, though."
Until Sandoval County receives a legal opinion from the attorney general, Dunlap said she will issue licenses to same-sex applicants. "This has nothing to do with politics or morals. If there are no legal grounds that say this should be prohibited, I can't withhold it," she said. "This office won't say no until shown it's not permissible."
In New Mexico, Gov. Bill Richardson has said he opposes same-sex marriages. In August, Richardson said he opposed same-sex marriage but supported equal rights.
The governor and his staff could not be reached for comment Thursday.
Copyright 2004 Albuquerque Journal


99 posted on 02/20/2004 11:25:02 AM PST by CedarDave (Waiting too long to bail the boat greatly increases the chance of sinking [Bush campaign silence])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Why, no! No I did not miss that.

then how can you accuse them of circumventing the law when the law says nothing about the sex of the couple to be married..

100 posted on 02/20/2004 11:25:43 AM PST by gawd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson