Skip to comments.
Global Warming Could Increase Western States Water Woes
Space Daily ^
| February 18, 2003
| L. Ruby Leung
Posted on 02/18/2004 2:11:37 PM PST by cogitator
Global Warming To Squeeze Western Mountains Dry By 2050
Seattle - Feb 18, 2004 Global warming will diminish the amount of water stored as snow in the Western United States by up to 70 percent in the coastal mountains over the next 50 years, according to a new climate change model released here today. The reduction in Western mountain snow cover, from the Sierra Nevada range that feeds California in the south to the snowcapped volcanic peaks of the Cascades in the Pacific Northwest, will lead to increased fall and winter flooding, severe spring and summer drought that will play havoc with the West's agriculture, fisheries and hydropower industry.
"And this is a best case scenario," said the forecast's chief modeler, L. Ruby Leung, a staff scientist at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash. Leung delivered the sobering report at the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting, and the full results of her study will appear soon in the journal Climatic Change, now in press.
Leung emphasized the estimate's conservativeness, noting that the climate projections of warming devised by DOE and the National Center for Atmospheric Research are on the low end compared to most other models. Leung's clumping of the models is part of the DOE's Accelerated Climate Prediction Initiative, or ACPI.
ACPI assumes a 1 percent annual increase in the rate of greenhouse gas concentrations through the year 2100, for little change in precipitation and an average temperature increase of 1.5 to 2 degrees centigrade at least through the middle of 21st century.
The result: more winter precipitation falling as rain instead of snow, two-tenths of an inch to more than half an inch a day, pushing the snowline in the mountains up from 3,000 feet to higher than 4,000 feet.
Where we now have snow in the mountains into April, "at mid-century snow will melt off much earlier than that," Leung said, noting research that shows in the past 50 years coastal mountain ranges have already lost 60 percent of their snowpack.
"The change in the timing of the water flow is not welcome," Leung said. "The rules we have now for managing dams and reservoirs and irrigation schedules cannot mitigate for the negative effects of climate change."
If this picture isn't bleak enough, Leung noted that the model does not even address the possibility of population growth and increased demand on water resources.
Mountain streams supply power and drinking water to Seattle, Portland and the San Francisco Bay Area and points south in densely populated Northern California, and they feed the booming agricultural industries in the Columbia and Willamette valleys of Washington and Oregon and the San Joaquin Valley in California.
If there is any good news, it can be found farther east, in the Rockies. There, the winters are so much colder that small temperature increases have will have less effect on the snowpack, Leung said.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Oregon; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: climatechange; rain; snow; snowpack; theskyisfalling; warming; water; west
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: cogitator; Grampa Dave
My very Western property is experiencing water woes alright.... I have not been able to mow for nearly one week due to nearly continuous rainfall! [Hey Grampa Dave, how are your water woes? Have you pulled your loved ones into that ark yet? ;)]
21
posted on
02/18/2004 3:13:11 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: farmfriend
ping
To: cogitator
Several states claim that this past winter has been the coldest in years. Are the glaciers returning soon? I need to prepare to move to Guatemala or Costa Rica.
To: cogitator
Last time I checked, the Pacific has plenty of water. Run some pipe and desalinate it.
24
posted on
02/18/2004 3:19:34 PM PST
by
petercooper
("daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime" - Nicole Gelinas, 02-10-04)
To: cogitator; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
25
posted on
02/18/2004 3:21:48 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: belmont_mark
My very Western property is experiencing water woes alright.... I have not been able to mow for nearly one week due to nearly continuous rainfall!That happened to us out East this summer.
The report doesn't indicate less precipitation; it may indicate more (hard to tell from the article). It indicates less snow, earlier spring melt, and higher snowlines. Because snowpack is where water is stored, that means a trend of less water in the western and Pac NW mountains.
To: cogitator
I'm glad this guy has a model, but I suggest he take the next fifty years and trty to validate the model. Then we can see if the weather and model agree.
Till then, let the market rule the water use and there will be lots of water. Continue to let government regulate it and there will be shortages.
27
posted on
02/18/2004 3:28:34 PM PST
by
KC_for_Freedom
(Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
To: cogitator
NASA? I have yet to see it shed it's PC style.
Heck, even then, the bureaucrats will just take the data out of context in the hopes of more funding.
I misplaced the link to that drunk weaving and stumbling down a highway, captioned: "His average position is between the lanes of traffic".
To: cogitator
Yep, its been a really warm winter everywhere in the US this year. Voodoo science.
29
posted on
02/18/2004 3:45:13 PM PST
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: cogitator
Or it could not increase then, but wouldn't that make for a boring research paper that wouldn't bring in a dime of future grant money.
30
posted on
02/18/2004 3:47:25 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(The only winner of a Neocon/Paleocan turd-chucking contest is John Forbes Kerry.)
To: cogitator
Let's hope. Global warming sounds good especially this year where in western NY we've had zero or below zero straight for a month.
31
posted on
02/18/2004 3:53:49 PM PST
by
eleni121
(Preempt and Prevent)
To: cogitator
Last year we skied until Memorial Day and could have gone on until the 4th of July if the resorts did not arbitrarily close. Gunning for a repeat this year. Sorry bud, once again, throwing chicken little onto my hot, smokin', CO2 wafting grill! Siiiiizzzzzzzzlllllllle.
32
posted on
02/18/2004 4:58:33 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: cogitator
Could and Would and Maybe,
A weaseling we shall go,
To catch the varmint is easy,
You just nail his ass to the floor.
33
posted on
02/18/2004 5:21:02 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: cogitator
A quick run through the internet shows you to be correct and I wrong.
Now I know. Thanks. :O)
34
posted on
02/18/2004 5:25:09 PM PST
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
Deep dowsing.
35
posted on
02/18/2004 5:29:44 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Jacquerie
"why would anyone respect a 50 year forecast?"
The United Nations will be in total control then. Maybe they can figure out what to do.
36
posted on
02/18/2004 5:42:26 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
( Dear Mr. President, Sir, Are you listening to the voters?)
To: HardStarboard
A few more
Global Warming Could have no effect on Western States Water Woes
Global Cooling Could have no effect on Western States Water Woes
Just maybe Global Warming or Global Cooling are the result of foces that humans can not significantly influence.
"<Sarcasm on] What effect do you want the model to show? We can "adjust" for the desired political impact. Just a few lines of code to edit.</Sarcasm]
37
posted on
02/18/2004 6:55:48 PM PST
by
Calamari
(Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
38
posted on
02/19/2004 3:21:33 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: cogitator
Hmm... 2 degree celsius difference. That's 3.6 degrees fahrenheit. So only in areas where the temperature is now 28.4 degrees or warmer will it be 32 degrees in 50 years. That's not much since the mountains are tall. I guess only the foothills will be really affected, if at all. It once reached -45 in Truckee. Wow, it could warm to -41.4
To: metesky
A quick run through the internet shows you to be correct and I wrong.Krakatoa got all the media attention (I have the recent book published about it, but I haven't read it yet), but Tambora was the big one, at least in recorded history.
If you want to know about the really big one, check out what the Internet says about the Toba eruption, and then take a look at this map:
Lake Toba is the caldera from the Toba eruption. It's 1700 square km and 450 m deep. Now THAT's a caldera.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson