Skip to comments.
Homosexuality and Hate Speech: Defending Moral Principles Is Getting Riskier
Zenit ^
| Feb. 14, 2004
Posted on 02/15/2004 2:49:05 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: Unam Sanctam
It has nothing to do with religion. Why does such research happen to be allowed only in non-Christian countries?
41
posted on
02/16/2004 12:18:00 AM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(arabed - verb: lower in esteem; hurt the pride of [syn: mortify, chagrin, humble, abase, humiliate])
To: Unam Sanctam
Are we headed towards some kind of global civil war, or is everyone just going to become Muslim.... this stuff won't stand forever.
42
posted on
02/16/2004 12:21:42 AM PST
by
Porterville
(Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in the deepest part of hell)
To: NYer
The document published last July by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith falls foul of the Incitement to Hatred Act, according to sources quoted in the Irish Times on Aug. 2. Hmmm... The lines of demarcation are becoming clearer.
43
posted on
02/16/2004 5:05:06 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: NYer; dansangel
Thanks as always for the ping....
44
posted on
02/16/2004 9:34:24 AM PST
by
.45MAN
(this page written on recyclable media)
To: 3catsanadog
In other words, suicide of gays is all our fault.
I certainly have no desire to be responsible for anyone committing suicide. Most normal people probably feel the same way.
However, if the cause of this situation is, as postulated, that their poor self esteem is due to my opinion (and by extension, that of the rest of society) of their activities, then an easy solution exists. Additionally, if, indeed, this poor self esteem leads to suicide, the solution to avoiding suicide on the part of homosexuals is incredibly simple:
If they wish to maintain some self-esteem by caring about what I (and by extension, that of the rest of society) thinks of their activities, then they should not engage in homosexual activities.
Alternately, if they wish to maintain their activities, then all that is necessary is for them to stop demanding that I (and by extension, that of the rest of society) care about their activities by forcing their agenda on me (and by extension, the rest of society).
Either way, problem solved!!!
To: Jeff Gordon
The shellfish objection is overcome by Acts 10:9-15
46
posted on
02/17/2004 6:33:25 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: Jeff Gordon
Does the state have a right to impose conservative religious views on sexual morality on the rest of society? Yes.
The state exists to provide for the safety and security of society. Since only Conservative religious views of sexual activity are best for society then only these views should be supported by the state. All others are attacks on the security and prosperity of society at large.
Every law imposes moral order of some sort. Only Christian moral order is best for all concerned.
47
posted on
02/17/2004 6:36:13 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: John O
Yes. Your honesty is appreciated.
48
posted on
02/17/2004 11:18:48 AM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(arabed - verb: lower in esteem; hurt the pride of [syn: mortify, chagrin, humble, abase, humiliate])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson