Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2004 9:21:35 AM PST by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Houmatt
Great..
they can all get together and do an AIDS-a-thon.
2 posted on 02/15/2004 9:24:28 AM PST by evad ("You cannot divorce yourself from your record.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Dammit.

If anyone can post the picture here, and do it without throwing up, please.

Thanks.

3 posted on 02/15/2004 9:24:33 AM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
"It's finally somebody saying, 'Yes, you can do this,'" said Peter Subers, 57, of Washington County, N.Y."

No, they can't do that. There was a referendum on this, overwhelmingly passed by Californians, that you cannot do this.

They are trying to punt to the 9th circus, where judges trump the will of the people.
5 posted on 02/15/2004 9:33:17 AM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
---I wonder what would happen in "Frisco" if three thousand gun owners decided to go excercise their right to carry concealed, own a semi- auto, etc.---?---in equally blatant violation of Commiefornia law---
6 posted on 02/15/2004 9:35:07 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Fourteen year olds are discriminated solely because of their age and are not allowed to get married in California what is stopping the mayor from granting them licenses as well?
7 posted on 02/15/2004 9:45:37 AM PST by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt

Declan Fitzgerald-Yu, 3, watches as his parents Danny Yu and Patrick Fitzgerald are married in a ceremony at City Hall in San Francisco, Saturday, Feb. 14, 2004. In an unprecedented spree of same-sex marriages that has challenged California law and sent conservative groups scrambling for court intervention, about 300 people lined up Saturday morning outside City Hall to secure marriage licenses, and then take each other as 'spouse for life'' in brief vows that have given San Francisco's seat of government the feel of a Las Vegas wedding chapel. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)

Dear Lord.

9 posted on 02/15/2004 9:49:30 AM PST by NewEnglandNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
This is the last time I ignore a "MEGA BARF ALERT" warning. I'm going to be spending all afternoon cleaning up my keyboard.
10 posted on 02/15/2004 9:53:13 AM PST by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Am I the only one who's homosexual friends weren't in long-term monogamous relationships? Come to think of it, in none of the articles are they described as monogamous.
11 posted on 02/15/2004 9:55:05 AM PST by tuesday afternoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
"I hereby announce them as husband and husband."

Who's my Daddy?

13 posted on 02/15/2004 10:13:44 AM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
can anyone guess what the islam terror-target map might look like these days? hot spots on both coasts, perhaps?
14 posted on 02/15/2004 10:15:14 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
If they married on Saint Valentine's Day, and public offices are closed on Sunday and on Monday ("President's Day), then by Tuesday their marriages will all have outlasted Britney Spears's.
17 posted on 02/15/2004 10:20:07 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Anarchy......no other word for it.
20 posted on 02/15/2004 10:38:43 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
I still don't understand what the big deal is. By California law, these "marriages" are NOT LEGAL. All these ceremonies amount to mass mutal mental masturbation. It feels good, but signifies nothing. These unions have the same power as would swearing in all the members of the SF Council as President of the United States.
21 posted on 02/15/2004 10:40:14 AM PST by frossca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Now I suppose they'll all want a lab to create little stem-cell queers they can call their own.....*BARF* *HEAVE* *YAK* *PUUUUUKE* *RETCH*
22 posted on 02/15/2004 10:45:23 AM PST by Viking2002 (Liberals can't take the heat unless they're the ones with their hands on the thermostat.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Same-Sex Couples Wed ...

No, they didn't.

26 posted on 02/15/2004 11:23:59 AM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Innovative, how the Bay Area has determined to fight for what they believe in...gay marriage, restricted types of abortions, etc...just "ignore the law." I guess that's different from "breaking the law." Just ignore it. Innovative. < /sarcasm>
27 posted on 02/15/2004 11:26:44 AM PST by Types_with_Fist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

I predict that this busy list is going to get even busier, as the the very busy homosexual activists and their handmaidens in the media intensify their attempt to turn the USA into their private homosexual playland-dominion.

If anyone wants off or on this list, pingify me.
33 posted on 02/15/2004 12:59:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
We sure have come a long way since our founding fathers (who would have no chance of getting elected to the offices they helped create were they alive to run for office today) began this nation with a determined reliance on God and the Bible. Today, no one seems interested in consulting God's Word on how He would have us run our society. I suppose we think that we can take it from here--thanks, God, for some 150-200 years of divine wisdom and help.

Isn't it funny how that our failure to honor God's laws is mirrored in our elected officials' failure to honor our own laws? Indeed, from our Supreme Court down to the mayors of major cities, law has become an inconvenience to be trampled upon should it contradict personal feelings of what should be versus what is. It's no wonder that Jesus, on that last day, will say "Depart from me, lawless ones, for I never knew you."

36 posted on 02/15/2004 1:51:07 PM PST by Egg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
Why would anyone expect that those who have no regard for the Natural Law would have any respect for a man made law, namely the covenant of Marriage?
41 posted on 02/15/2004 4:01:31 PM PST by Right_Handed_Writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt
The worst part of Saturdays wedding assembly line in San Francisco is that the news on TV had guys kissing guys, and gals kissing gals in our faces. I'd rather be forced to watch a whole Jerry Lewis movie than to see two guys kissing each other, and I can't stand Jerry Lewis movies.
53 posted on 02/15/2004 9:53:15 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Part of the Vast Right Wing Apparatus since Ford lost. ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson