Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin's evolution ship 'found'
The Age ^ | February 15, 2004 | AAP

Posted on 02/14/2004 6:55:32 PM PST by yonif

Edited on 02/14/2004 7:04:03 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

British archaeologists believed they have finally located the long-lost remnants of HMS Beagle, the ship which took Charles Darwin on the voyage during which he formulated the theory of evolution, a report says.

The fate of the Beagle, which carried Darwin for five years from 1851, has remained a mystery for more than a century.

However, according to The Observer, archaeologists using advanced ground-penetrating radar think they have found it buried under mud in a river estuary in Essex, south-east England.

"I am quietly confident we have found the Beagle," marine archaeologist Robert Prescott of Scotland's St Andrews University told the newspaper.

The radar image shows a ship similar in size to the Beagle - which was used as a customs boat after Darwin's voyage - lying under three metres of mud near a long-abandoned dock, Prescott said.

"Most of the upper part of the ship may have gone, but we have the lower part and hull, and who knows what remnants of Darwin's trip may still lie down there," he said.

"That is why this ship is so intriguing."

Darwin's voyage took him on a lengthy surveying trip of South America and the Galapagos Islands.

From notes he took about differences in birds and animal life, Darwin concluded that species change gradually over time through a process of natural selection, which benefits those best adapted to their environment.

His ideas were published in 1859 in On the Origin of Species, attracting vehement criticism from Christians before eventually becoming accepted as one of the most important scientific theories in history.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: biology; crevolist; darwin; discovery; exploration; hmsbeagle; science; ship; shipwreck; theory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: yonif
wow, his ship evolved into rot and mud.
61 posted on 02/15/2004 1:15:43 PM PST by fish hawk ("I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
BOO!


62 posted on 02/15/2004 1:27:31 PM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Yet another of the fishes wandering the world's oceans with Charles Darwin:


63 posted on 02/15/2004 1:57:51 PM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I wonder if it's grown feet by now...
64 posted on 02/15/2004 3:10:43 PM PST by jonatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

65 posted on 02/15/2004 3:46:57 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
***And I've read that grasses and trees existed before the sun did. People dream up the damndest stuff, don't they?
***


Yes and I've read that some physicists believe that everything suddenly existed where nothing did before. People do indeed dream up the most hare-brained things!
66 posted on 02/16/2004 5:23:49 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
LOL!! So that's where it is!
67 posted on 02/16/2004 5:42:49 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
And why does that sound hare-brained to you?
68 posted on 02/16/2004 6:41:06 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Because it's logically impossible for anything other than your personal deity to exist without being created. In logic there's a rule that you only get one exception to the rules of logic, and that's it.
69 posted on 02/16/2004 6:46:50 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Because it's logically impossible for anything other than your personal deity to exist without being created.

OK, so by that reasoning, time must have been created. When did that happen, and what existed before?

70 posted on 02/16/2004 8:03:01 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
I'm not sure how time was created, but noting your tagline, it speeds up a lot when children are born.
71 posted on 02/16/2004 8:55:29 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Yes and I've read that some physicists believe that everything suddenly existed where nothing did before. People do indeed dream up the most hare-brained things!

You mean the Bible, don't you?

Genesis 1:1

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

It's funny how as scientists move closer to the Biblical narrative, creationists get more and more upset.

72 posted on 02/16/2004 9:22:33 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
***You mean the Bible, don't you?***

No, when I said "...suddenly existed where nothing did before" I couldn't have been talking about the Biblical narrative because it quite clearly states:

"In the beginning, God..."

God was there.

73 posted on 02/16/2004 9:49:05 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
***... and what existed before?***



The I AM



Exodus 3:14
http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?passage=EXOD+3:13-15&language=english&version=KJV&showfn=on&showxref=on
74 posted on 02/16/2004 9:53:32 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
The I AM

Tut, tut. It was a trick question. Saying that the "I AM" came "before" presupposes the existence of time. It makes no sense to say that time came into existence after anything else. Try again.

75 posted on 02/16/2004 10:01:38 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Isn't it interesting that God refers to Himself in the present tense. Not "I WAS" or "I WILL BE"

I think it's safe to assume that God exists in a state outside of time and outside of the physical universe - a state of being that just "is" and has no past of future.

Time brings with it the inevitable concept of change. Since God is perfect, and perfection can't change, then a perfect being would have no time-reference.

The Hebrews were quite clear that God is unchanging and perfect - interesting considering they may not have been able to conceptualize a state of "no-time" in our abstract 21st century ways.

All "time" is present to Him at once - He must look on the past, present and future as we would flip pages in a book.

I think of the universe as a created bubble in the no-time God state.
76 posted on 02/16/2004 10:30:41 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
I think of the universe as a created bubble in the no-time God state.

Ah...so you're saying that it's not logically impossible for something to exist that is external to our space and time?

77 posted on 02/16/2004 10:34:40 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
No, when I said "...suddenly existed where nothing did before" I couldn't have been talking about the Biblical narrative because it quite clearly states:

"In the beginning, God..."

God was there.

So you think God made the universe out of himself?

I haven't seen the chapter and verse on that.

78 posted on 02/16/2004 10:49:52 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I hope the Covenant is still onboard.
79 posted on 02/16/2004 10:52:39 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
***Ah...so you're saying that it's not logically impossible for something to exist that is external to our space and time?***

Well if you are defining the universe as "our space and time" and the universe is the set of all things that exist then logically no - if something exists then it is part of the universe.

But as to whether God has other creation apart from this universe... I have no idea. But I kind of think He would, based on this universe He seems to be very creative! But that is pure speculation.

Now what I am saying it that someONE (not someTHING) exists outside of our time and space.

(And I know dimensionality is a TSME term, but where humans and have to talk in human terms here. I can't conceptualize a non dimensional or infinite dimensional state).
80 posted on 02/16/2004 10:55:05 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson