Posted on 02/13/2004 11:51:10 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
The cover of the latest NEWSWEEK magazine asks the right question: "Who killed Jesus?" This has been a raging debate for a year, since Mel Gibson started his remarkable film project THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. He immediately ran into a buzz saw of opposition from the liberal media and Jewish groups who were afraid the film would rekindle anti-Semitism.
Now, Jews have a legitimate concern about this. During the Middle Ages, Christians treated Jews terribly. In Russia there were pogroms against the Jews. And of course some of the maniacs around Hitler professed that they were killing Jews to purify the Christian race.
But is this sensitivity today well-founded? If we would look at history alone, we would have to say that Pontius Pilate certainly was guilty. Legend has it that years after the crucifixion he was frantically washing his hands trying to cleanse himself from the blood of Christ. And, of course, Caiphus the High Priest certainly bears his share of responsibility. So do the crowds who yelled, "Crucify him." So was it the Romans or the Jews, the venality of Pontius Pilate or the passion of the mob?
It was both and neither. The Jews didn't cause the death of Jesus, nor did the Romans. They were merely instruments carrying out what God had decreed. He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross so that the sins of mankind might be forgiven. And those who take Scripture seriously have always known who killed Jesus: You and I and all other sinful human beings did so.
Mel Gibson understands this. In his movie, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST, the hand holding the spike being nailed through Christ's wrist is Gibson's. Who killed Jesus? Mel Gibson knows. And he made the very point with his own hand that he was responsible, not the Jews.
Similarly the Dutch painter, Rembrandt painted THE RAISING OF THE CROSS as a self-portrait. As Christ hangs on the cross while it is being lifted into place, the soldier pulling it up is Rembrandt. Who killed Jesus? Rembrandt knew. He did. And I did. And you did. We're the ones who sent Jesus to the cross loaded down with our sins.
So enough of this foolish controversy. My advice to Christians is that you make it abundantly clear to your friends and neighbors that we are the ones responsible and then take them to see the film. Let them experience the passion and explain to them why it was necessary for Jesus to go to the cross. And be ready with a biblical answer for your Jewish friends who hear all of this propaganda, most of it stirred up by professional activists.
Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says that it is not who is to blame that really has everybody up in arms. The media elite know that if people see this film, the right answer to the haunting question "Who Killed Jesus?" will be clear. What strikes terror into the hearts of the media elite is that people might once again be convicted of sin, repent, and come to faith in Christ.
So, three cheers for Mel Gibson. And thanks to NEWSWEEK for asking the right question, even if it does not have the right answer. But now it is up to us Christians to do our job to educate our neighbors and flood the movie theaters.
Where do they say that?
It's not an accusation.
Of course it is an accusation. Are we next going to debate what the definition of "is" is?
I don't know where you're getting this idea that somehow I'm "accusing" anyone of some kind of crime.
Agitating for an innocent man's death, if not technically a crime, is certainly wrongdoing.
People didn't have the same attitudes in 32 a.d. that they do nowadays--they didn't have our exquisite sensibilities.
Do you mean people didn't use to mind being accused of murder without evidence?
The bigwigs of Judaea were scared shitless of the Romans and were willing to part with a single human life to save the millions that would have been lost if the Romans had decided to put down a sedition militarily.
Prove it.
That is perhaps the most scurrilous accusation in the entire New Testament. The idea that "one man should die for the people" is entirely contrary to Jewish law. It is a Christian concept, not a Jewish one.
Prove it actually happened.
Oh yes, and while you're taking your Prozac, get this: I don't know where you stand vis-a-vis the Christian gospels, but if there's any truth to them, he was a blasphemer and an idolator ... both high crimes against the law which he professed to uphold. I'd suggest you get your facts straight, and then take a slightly different approach to religion ... one that accounts for the spirit of the thing, and not the spitting hatred which is so often its hallmark.
Is Gibson going to put up a disclaimer on the screen, "None of these events are meant to portray any person living or dead?"
He should, but I don't think he will. He is accusing real people of doing things that he cannot prove.
Present some evidence (that will hold up in court, of course) that you are something other than a pernicious, Christian-hating agitator with a chip on his shoulder that is so big I can see it from here.
Well, yes, he was dead. For 3 days.
Is there a source for this on the web? This is a great quote. This is a perfect response to missionaries.
Indeed,, and that is exactly the point.
So why then has this debate continued over millenia; with a modern-day Pope seeing a need to presume to "forgive the Jews;" the persistence of idiotic hysteria surrounding a movie, fanned by people who claim to be religious and comprehend that which is sacred; and, last but not least, this truly inane thread (82 posts and counting)in a forum that rightly was created to "roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America?"
Anyway, any true Democrat will tell you that in fact it was none other than the ever-AWOL George W. Bush who "killed" Jesus when he instead should have been attending to his National Guard duties in Alabama.
And that Cavalry and the crosses thereupon were built by Haliburton...
Uh, let me think. Could it be because the Jews are being accused of MURDER???
Groan. Or, worse yet, the Easter Bunny in Roman centurian garb......
Christian love raises its ugly head once again!
You are the one making accusations about people "agitating" for someone's death, not me.
I merely asked you to prove your accusations and you seemed to get very angry.
Not by THIS Christian!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.