Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pointless debate on Bush service
2theadvocate.com (Louisiana) ^ | 2.13.04

Posted on 02/12/2004 10:46:51 PM PST by ambrose

Pointless debate on Bush service

The release of what records remain of President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard ought to put to rest criticism, if only on the grounds that the critics don't have any evidence.

The president has been accused of shirking his Guard duties while he was politicking for a family friend in Alabama. The president said he didn't, and the evidence that is available after the passage of 30 years is negligible -- some pay stubs, and Bush's honorable discharge.

That doesn't prove he wasn't absent without leave at some time -- but is the campaign going to be consumed by a question about which little can reasonably be known?

We hope not.

The contrast between the president's limited but apparently honorable service in the Guard and the heroism of John Kerry, now the leading Democratic candidate for president, does not constitute a beginning of a useful debate this year.

The story goes: Bush was supposed to report for duty at the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery, Ala. The unit's commander at the time was quoted by several news organizations as saying he had no recollection of Bush showing up. "I had been in Texas, done my flight training there. If we had had a first lieutenant from Texas, I would have remembered," The Boston Globe quoted retired Gen. William Turnipseed as saying.

The Globe quoted Bush as saying through his spokesman Dan Bartlett that he recalled reporting for nonflying duty in Alabama, performing "odds and ends" under supervisors whose names he could not recall.

Bush himself later was quoted directly by The Dallas Morning News as admitting he missed some weekend drills while in Alabama, but saying he made them up afterward: "I was there on a temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one period of time," he said. "I made up some missed weekends."

This does not constitute "desertion," a word thrown around by liberal critics.

Many people joined the National Guard to avoid the draft during the Vietnam era. That said, Bush's service included flying -- one of the more dangerous duties of guardsmen. There is no damning evidence that the prominence of Bush's father helped him get a placement in the Guard, and after all this time there is little likelihood that evidence will surface.

We believe this is much ado about nothing.

The policies that Bush has embraced as president, and the policies that Kerry has embraced as a senator from Massachusetts, should be what voters focus on in this election.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; militaryrecord; servicerecord

1 posted on 02/12/2004 10:46:51 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The policies that Bush has embraced as president, and the policies that Kerry has embraced as a senator from Massachusetts, should be what voters focus on in this election.

Bump!

2 posted on 02/12/2004 10:50:29 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
There is one tiny fact everyone seems to be overlooking: WAS President George W Bush written up as being A.W.O.L. back when the Democrats seem to be lying about it?
I served 4 years in the US NAVY and was AWOL on one occassion. I was written up, went to Captain's Mast and served my punishment.
It seems to me Democrats have tossed 'innocent until proven guilty' .... or even 'charged with a crime' ... out the window
3 posted on 02/12/2004 10:53:44 PM PST by Dittohead_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
If Bush had received a dishonorable discharge, it would have been germane during his first run for governor, or even the presidency.  To raise that issue now, while he's a sitting president headed into a run for his second term, is nonsense.  The man is functioning as an effective chief executive.  It's a little late to state that his records from thirty years ago should preclude him from holding office.

The real hoot about all this is that the very people who are going after Bush with a vengeance are those who gave Bill Clinton a pass for dodging the draft completely.  Not only did he dodge the draft, he burned our flag in the streets of Europe, and traveled in very high circles through the eastern block into Soviet Russia at a time when almost nobody could.  This and a myriad of other disqualifiers were overlooked by these folks as if they meant nothing.  Neither did direct payments from the top generals of China, specifically the daughter of the general who was in charge of the Tianimen Sqare (sp?) massacre.

Now these folks loft the Kerry/Fonda 2004 campaign.  Aint life grand...
4 posted on 02/12/2004 10:59:55 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
A recent AP story on the Bush National Guard story had *4* reporters on the byline. Four!

How many reporters did the AP ever assign to investigate Mena? Dan Lasseter? Jerry Parks? ADFA?
5 posted on 02/12/2004 11:14:31 PM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The Democrats are only raising this issue because President Bush's military leadership is one of his strengths and the American people respect him for it. Now that the Democrats finally found somebody in their ranks who served in the military, they are playing it for all its' worth. What hypocrites!
6 posted on 02/12/2004 11:17:37 PM PST by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
In twenty years, about four.

Three are dead, two toes, one ear and one eyelid are the only body parts we know the whereabouts of the fourth.

Okay... I'm kidding. It was only one toe.

Heh heh heh...

7 posted on 02/12/2004 11:55:51 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KittyKares
Hypocrites, for sure. Only the democrats are running a male Jane Fonda for office. This is going to be sweet.
8 posted on 02/12/2004 11:57:10 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson