Posted on 02/12/2004 10:18:44 PM PST by Remember_Salamis
The Fourth Estate is not interested in petty gossip and unfounded rumors. We report on matters of high policy pertaining to the public interest. Consequently, the rumor of a sexual liaison between a certain presidential candidate and a female intern with the Associated Press wouldn't ordinarily be the sort of thing we'd stoop to publish or broadcast. Sadly, however, overriding considerations compel us to share this information with the public:
1) It's a press story. "Welcome to Reliable Sources, where we turn a critical lens on the media. I'm Howard Kurtz. Should the media report unsourced rumors about THAT WOMAN JOHN KERRY'S BEEN BANGING BEHIND TERESA'S BACK? How much coverage of a candidate's private life is too much? Here to discuss this with us are Tom Rosenstiel and Bob Guccione."
An imaginative new variation on this approach is to omit the ethics angle entirely and merely speculate about whether the press will report on the rumor, as if it were some other beast entirely from oneself.
2) It's an Internet phenomenon. The people sharing rumors about John Kerry's sex life by e-mail and on Weblogs constitute a vital new subculture—a new news medium, if you will, one that doesn't play by the old rules. This cries out for sociological analysis.
3) It's a story about bare-knuckled negative campaigning. Dukakis campaign manager John Sasso lost his job in 1988 for secretly distributing to TV news organizations an "attack video" comparing a speech by rival candidate Joe Biden with the speech it was plagiarized from, by British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock. Shame on him! But thanks for the fabulous footage …
This time, the role of Sasso is played by Chris Lehane, former press secretary to Wes Clark, and, before that, to John Kerry. But in a new twist, Lehane's role is an unconfirmed rumor, too! (Lehane gets blamed for everything nasty in the 2004 presidential race.)
4) It's a story about financial impropriety, maybe. Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros' affair with Linda Jones became the public's business because he paid her more than $250,000 while the taxpayers were paying his salary. Apparently the taxpayers didn't want him spending his salary on a sexy blonde; they wanted him to spend it on a subscription to National Journal. Cisneros resolved this by paying $100,000 to the government. If this can be sold as a financial scandal, anything can.
5) It's a story about sexual harassment. See Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, et. al. In lieu of actual evidence, it's sufficient to find the accuser believable. That was Wall Street Journal editorialist Dorothy Rabinowitz's justification for running with the story of Juanita Broaddrick, who claimed that Bill Clinton raped her. Previously, Rabinowitz had achieved renown by disbelieving stories of sexual impropriety.
6) It's a story about character. Suzannah Lessard published an essay two decades ago in the New Republic about presidential candidate Ted Kennedy's womanizing, and what it might mean about his character. She tactfully left out the evidence. Now we never leave out evidence, or even speculation. If people say nasty things about you, that in itself reveals something about your character—even if they aren't true!
7) It's a story about hypocrisy. Every politician praises the institutions of marriage and the family. Ergo, every politician is a hypocrite when rumored to be having an affair. In the future, all politicians will be forced to praise promiscuity and to say that marriage should be banned not only for gays, but for heterosexuals.
8) It's a story about electability. Anything that's believed about Kerry, even if it's untrue, affects his electability. He is not a person. He is the public's perception of a person. A rumor is a component of that perception.
9) It's a story about a Democrat, and all Democrats are scum. This justification only works for the conservative press.
10) Lighten up—it's a humor piece! Never trust anyone who tries to justify himself this way.
Timothy Noah writes "Chatterbox" for Slate.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.msn.com ...
The scandal?
"Her mother Donna claims Kerry, 60 — dubbed the new JFK — once chased Alex to be on his campaign team and was “after her”. There is no evidence the pair had an affair, but her father Terry, 56, said: “I think he’s a sleazeball. I did kind of wonder if my daughter didn’t get that kind of feeling herself.
And that's pretty much it. Or at least, that's about it as far as details of the "scandal" reported on Drudge's site.
Of course, if the alleged letters to her surface, then he is going down faster than that wounded Viet Cong guy he shot.
Republicans tried to rely on this sort of thing as a campaign issue against a second Clinton term, and the public rejected it. Beating this drum too loudly will just make us seem petty and desperate.
Thankfully, GWB has too much sense and too much class to make much ado about this "issue". I don't think we, as Republicans and Republican-leaning independents should get too wrapped up in this. Negative messages don't win presidential elections. Let's leave the negative stuff to Terry McAwful, he seems to think that Bush's service record is their keys to the kingdom, and the longer they concentrate on such meaningless crap, the less time they have to mount an effective campaign.
Just my $0.02 worth...
So *that's* why they're covering the 'Bush was AWOL' non-story.
Mr. Noah:
Many of the tales of "sexual impropriety" committed by clowns in hidden rooms at daycares have now been disavowed by the courts. In this instance, Rabinowitz was on the side of the evidence, against nonsense and smear, and your subtly inaccurate rendition of her reporting exposes you as guilty of the journalistic crime you detest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.