Skip to comments.
GOP senators, officials back alien proposal
Washington Times ^
| 2/13/04
| Jerry Seper
Posted on 02/12/2004 9:41:24 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The administration rolled out its top immigration officials and several senior Republican senators yesterday to endorse publicly a guest-worker program offered by President Bush that could give legal status to the 8 million to 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: aliens; bush43; freetrade; gop; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationplan; jerryseper; nwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 281-292 next last
To: taxed2death
The word "treason" has a specific meaning. GWB has done more thus far, in the area of increased border protection than any previous administration.
Your words are out of line and a misrepresentation of the facts.
If you do not know what that means, I'll be happy to explain it to you in a form that you will understand.
61
posted on
02/13/2004 11:32:14 AM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: kattracks
Republican internationalists & globalists who want to see a common serfdom stretch from Canada to South America are betraying our country.
It may not count for much, but I won't be voting Repub. this Fall. I will be voting Constitution Party. (and for any candidate regardless of party affiliation that is willing to control our borders and expel illegal aliens.
To: taxed2death
This does absolutely NOTHING to correct a probem..... "This".
What is "this"?
If you had watched the hearing you would know that the range of proposals stretched from tinkering with the current law to trash canning the entire thing and starting over from scratch!
There is no "this" yet!
63
posted on
02/13/2004 11:37:14 AM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: Bikers4Bush
I'm afraid no one can explain other than the ruling elite of both parties want to satisfy the demand for low wage workers.
The Democrats see illegals as future dem voters, union paying members that they control through incremental increases in minimum wage, hence more dues and contributions to dem candidates.
Some Republicans see them as low wage workers that will help provide corporations with cheap labor needed to sustain a positive bottomline.
I have seen what the uncontrolled illegal immigration has done to the economy of California by way of education and healthcare. I have seen the politicians there trash the People's iniative 187.
In history, immigrants were admitted legally for the purpose of supplying labor to industry but it was always controlled, turned on and then off. In the past recent decades, this control has been abandoned because it serves a narrow but powerful elite political class and their backers.
64
posted on
02/13/2004 11:38:30 AM PST
by
Hostage
To: Sabertooth
In advocating for the Bush Amnesty, you are doing harm to the Republican Party, not to mention the country. What I'm hearing out of Washington is, "Read my lips. Tight national security."
65
posted on
02/13/2004 11:39:54 AM PST
by
Barnacle
(Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.)
To: PresbyRev
I will be voting Constitution Party. Exactly what the democrats want you to do!
Pitiful!
66
posted on
02/13/2004 11:40:41 AM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: Texas_Jarhead
At the present rate of immigration, by mid 2050 there will be 200 million immigrants in the country. I'm happy that Ted Kennedy likes the Bush proposal. That shows it has to be hell on earth for Americans.
67
posted on
02/13/2004 11:46:58 AM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos)
To: kattracks
The man's a fool.
68
posted on
02/13/2004 11:54:41 AM PST
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
To: ClintonBeGone
Come on, wake up!
The LEGAL Hispanics, the only ones who will/can vote, they hate the amnesty plan more than I do.
And if Bush is willing to screw America just for getting a few extra votes, well ____ him.
69
posted on
02/13/2004 12:01:10 PM PST
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
To: wirestripper
She said"in my book".
It's her opinion.
She has a right to express it,
70
posted on
02/13/2004 12:21:24 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: wirestripper
>>GWB has done more thus far, in the area of increased border protection than any previous administration.
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!
So giving amnesty to illegals is border control? Thanks for the joke! I needed a good laugh.
Sorry, but this amnesty proposal does equate to treason!
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin156.htm
To: kattracks
You know I sometimes wonder if the political scene is no more that entertainment provided by the elite...
to pacify the peasant class.
72
posted on
02/13/2004 12:56:43 PM PST
by
Barnacle
(Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.)
To: kattracks
BUSH TO CONSERVATIVES: "DROP DEAD"
73
posted on
02/13/2004 12:57:04 PM PST
by
Map Kernow
("I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: gubamyster
Et tu, Brutus?
74
posted on
02/13/2004 1:07:11 PM PST
by
Paulie
To: wirestripper
GWB has done more thus far, in the area of increased border protection than any previous administration. You couldn't prove it where I live. Illegal alien traffic is up 114% over this time last year and last year's level sucked.
The Border Patrol is undermanned and under-equipped for the job they are trying to do. So why does Dubya's FY 2005 proposed budget cut the Border Patrol's funding by $130 million?
Maybe because he thinks our borders are meaningless?
75
posted on
02/13/2004 1:14:16 PM PST
by
JackelopeBreeder
(Proud to be a loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
To: chris1
More Tidbits.
Illegal immigrants already in the United States and people still in their home countries would be matched with employers. - Nothing said about American Citizens.
Since September 11, 2001, the Border Patrol has increased the number of agents from 9,788 to 10,835 as of December 1, 2003 - Wow, almost 1,100, and during WAR TIME even!
"You can extend it for a significant period of time," said Eduardo Aguirre, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Currently, undocumented immigrants who have left the United States are prohibited from re-entering America legally for three to 10 years. Aguirre said that many of the immigrants in the United States would have been in the country illegally long enough to be subject to the re-entry prohibitions.
"I would suggest that ought to be waived," Aguirre said
I WOULD SUGGEST
NO BORDERS - NO VOTES.
76
posted on
02/13/2004 1:18:17 PM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
To: TomasUSMC
Before January 7, there was one and only one person I would even consider voting for: George W. Bush.
After January 7, there is one and only one way I will consider voting for George W. Bush: his repudiation of this amnesty plan, in favor of good faith and strenuous enforcement of existing immigration laws.
77
posted on
02/13/2004 1:31:00 PM PST
by
Map Kernow
("I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: JackelopeBreeder
You couldn't prove it where I live.I do not have to, it is a fact regardless of what you see.
Since INS was folded into HS, the border has indeed been strenghtened,
Bush has said, that much more needs to be done and legislation must be written and funded by congress to do just that.
78
posted on
02/13/2004 2:35:21 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: philetus
She said"in my book". It's her opinion. She has a right to express it, certainly everyone has a right to their opinions.
Expressing those opinions does have limitations however.
I am not the expression police, but I personally find some adjectives/adverbs, when used against people who in no way are deserving of such to be over the line.
Words like treason are not interchangeable with A'hole or other expressions. They have a very specific meaning and carry a death penalty. It is a legal term.
I would be careful when using these types of words.
79
posted on
02/13/2004 2:42:06 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: kattracks
Bump.
80
posted on
02/13/2004 2:44:55 PM PST
by
Missouri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 281-292 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson