Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: 1stFreedom
You breaking news belongs to us....
To: 1stFreedom
There are wise mods and idiot mods. You met up with the latter. Let it go.
3 posted on
02/12/2004 9:00:45 AM PST by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
To: 1stFreedom
I agree with you. Some people (and I'm one) won't bother to look at a 500+ post thread--too much to wade through. I'd rather read the actual article, on its own thread.
5 posted on
02/12/2004 9:02:02 AM PST by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: 1stFreedom
Only One thing to do..............
TOGA PARTY!
6 posted on
02/12/2004 9:02:39 AM PST by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
To: 1stFreedom
I think you're gonna get sent to "Time Out". LOL!
7 posted on
02/12/2004 9:03:08 AM PST by
Constitution Day
(Eschew exclamatory abuse.)
To: 1stFreedom
The Coup de Grace will be when this gets moved to Chat.
8 posted on
02/12/2004 9:03:18 AM PST by
martin_fierro
(Chat is my milieu)
To: 1stFreedom
Hmmm....giving this "hugh" and "series" consideration........
(good idea though....!! ;^)
9 posted on
02/12/2004 9:03:33 AM PST by
soozla
(BUSH/CHENEY 2004**Send John "Effin'" Kerry back to Easter Island!!!!!)
To: 1stFreedom; Admin Moderator
We should go with the actual breaking news and not with Preliminary hints.
My least favorite is when someone posts at 9 am: "News conference at 2 PM."
You get 5 hours of fluff and then the actual news from the conference is undercut and sometimes putting up the actual news is not permitted.
10 posted on
02/12/2004 9:04:01 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of it!!)
To: 1stFreedom
The article you were trying to reach has been moved to Chat...
Just kidding.
But yes. You are right. I was looking for the entire story not 500 speculations of what the story MIGHT be about.
To: 1stFreedom
'tis a quandary. Should a Drudge ***BREAKING HARD!!!!! Nothing follows.*** ever qualify as "breaking news"?
14 posted on
02/12/2004 9:06:10 AM PST by
Redcloak
(Raining on parades since 8:37 this morning.)
To: 1stFreedom
Nice whine.
Now predict how many times the Drudge story will be posted today.
17 posted on
02/12/2004 9:09:14 AM PST by
Catspaw
To: 1stFreedom
There is a full history on the first thread, and freeper posts are worthy of reading vs. the convenience of having the "facts" posted at the beginning instead of in the replies.
It's a tough call, sometimes the "speculative" thread will be better, sometimes not.
Now Rush is talking about it- is that worth another thread?
20 posted on
02/12/2004 9:10:31 AM PST by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: 1stFreedom
Your argument makes sense
editing the original to contain the article, or put up a new thread.
But just so you know its just like that John Cougar songs says "I fight authority and a authority always wins"
21 posted on
02/12/2004 9:10:33 AM PST by
Cubs Fan
(Liberals have the inverse midas touch, everything they get a hold of turns to S&*%)
To: 1stFreedom
Break, break, break on thy cold grey stones, oh news;
And I would that my heart could utter my own irrefutable views.
22 posted on
02/12/2004 9:10:46 AM PST by
T'wit
(We may always have death and taxes, but death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets.)
To: 1stFreedom
The truth is that we don't need to be bothered with 200 posts about everone guessing what the news is gonna be. It's waste of bandwith and time. No offense, but a flashing light is not breaking news.
To: 1stFreedom
Precisely why I never post Breaking Wind stories about "Rush Limbaugh just said this" or "O'Reilly just said that."
Seems you always get 3~4 dozen people always rushing to post the same I-heard-it-first thread.
Don't matter to me whatsoever.
Let the Mods sort it out whatever way they want.
Just my 2¢
To: 1stFreedom
This is "Breaking News"? ;O)
(Whoops. Not any more!)
28 posted on
02/12/2004 9:15:10 AM PST by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: 1stFreedom
Drudge Exclusive!
Sidebar imploding!
Developing....
31 posted on
02/12/2004 9:17:38 AM PST by
Diddle E. Squat
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: 1stFreedom
I don't think this requires a rules change. Just suggest it to the mods. Sounds like a good idea.
To: 1stFreedom
As you wish. Your post, and all those like it, have been restored. Regards.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson