Skip to comments.
Bush and I were Lieutenants (Fellow Pilot Comes to Bush's Defense)
The Washington Times Letters to the Editor ^
| 2-11-4
| Col. William Campenni (ret.)
Posted on 02/11/2004 6:20:44 AM PST by Petronski
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
'Bush and I were lieutenants'
George Bush and I were lieutenants and pilots in the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron (FIS), Texas Air National Guard (ANG) from 1970 to 1971. We had the same flight and squadron commanders (Maj. William Harris and Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, both now deceased). While we were not part of the same social circle outside the base, we were in the same fraternity of fighter pilots, and proudly wore the same squadron patch.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Texas; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2004; awol; bush; bushmilitaryrecord; campenni; herndon; lte; militaryrecord; nationalguard; servicerecord; slander
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 next last
To: Petronski
That's it. I know a guy who flew those planes. He said that they had only 1.5 hrs. of fuel. So, after 45 min. you had to be sure that you could get back to your base in 45 min. Plus, they could be really unstable at times.
681
posted on
02/11/2004 7:40:52 PM PST
by
Parmy
To: clyde260
Well .. if the Washington Times printed the letter, they have no excuse for saying they don't have the information.
682
posted on
02/11/2004 7:42:24 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: CyberAnt
I just got home from doing an additional drill with my Naval Reserve squadron...I'm so happy that someone finally stepped up to set the record straight. We were joking today that no one in my squadron could ever run for POTUS because we've all missed a drill or two along the way.
683
posted on
02/11/2004 7:51:11 PM PST
by
HRoarke
(F. John Kerry-Benedict Arnold was a Veteran too!)
To: mathluv
"talking about the Vagina Monologues - and how they have become a national movement."
No, no, no.. It is the 'bowel' monologues. They are the national movement!
684
posted on
02/11/2004 7:52:03 PM PST
by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: afropick
And .. as for AWOL, THERE IS NO SUCH CLASSIFICATION IN THE NATIONAL GUARD - EXCEPT IF THEY ARE "ACTIVITATED" - which means called to "active duty".
For McAwful to even say Lt. Bush was AWOL is a big fat lie!! So what else is new!
685
posted on
02/11/2004 7:58:06 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: SAMWolf
This should do it.
To: bluesagewoman
Thanks Blue.
687
posted on
02/11/2004 8:03:14 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
(I misplaced my dictionary. Now I'm at a loss for words.)
To: SAMWolf
688
posted on
02/11/2004 8:04:45 PM PST
by
July 4th
(George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
To: July 4th
Cool Good work.
689
posted on
02/11/2004 8:11:58 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
(I misplaced my dictionary. Now I'm at a loss for words.)
To: Petronski
Sent to two of the guys at the office when I first ran across it, their responses are as follows:
Mark: That was a sweet article!! This whole strategy will backfire bigtime on them.
Dan: Doesn't address Bush's absence from the alabama or georga or whatever SE state, national guard.
It simply defends texas national guard and the national guard in general. My brothers quote was "Don't worry, sleep tight, because you know your national guard is out partying!"
Some folks refuse to dispose of their tin-foil hats and they're hopeless; beyond any and all redemption (sans the Lord)... And they will vote their brothers (Mothers, Fathers, or the Winos) opinion; because they simply cannot, or will not, excercise independent thought.
What a pathetic state we're in...
Where are the sentient?
690
posted on
02/11/2004 8:13:13 PM PST
by
gatorgriz
("The world is full of bastards - the number ever increasing the further one gets from Missoula, MT")
To: Petronski
A Big ol' Bumpity Bump!
691
posted on
02/11/2004 8:13:36 PM PST
by
TruthNtegrity
(I refuse to call candidates for President "Democratic" as they are NOT. Socialists, actually.))
To: xzins
Bump!
To: Petronski
Absolutely excellent article. I'm so sick and tired of lying Liberals. A bunch of two faced, lying back stabbers, not to mention the height of hypocrisy in their "own" backgrounds. This article is a gem and may many more surface. The ironic thing is that THESE Loudmouths supported a "draft Dodger", philandereer, pathological liar, with the morals and character of a sewer rat for President!! How absurd!
693
posted on
02/11/2004 8:25:38 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
To: mass55th
Hmmmm? I thought Liz Trotta was head of the Wash Times. If so, she very conservative.
694
posted on
02/11/2004 8:31:06 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Parmy
From an Air Force pilot I dated when I was younger, they are "incredibly unforgiving". Meaning? Tricky and weird.
Do something wrong, the slightest little thing, and you are in a big recovery effort.
On May 1st, 2003, when the President flew in Navy One to land on the carrier, he was in a far more forgiving aircraft. Much more forgiving.
(Gosh as a Navy person, I just love that designator: Navy One.)
Go Navy!
695
posted on
02/11/2004 8:36:26 PM PST
by
TruthNtegrity
(I refuse to call candidates for President "Democratic" as they are NOT. Socialists, actually.))
To: Petronski
The President is a good and honorable man. Americans instinctively know this.
The Washington Times letter supports this fact.
To: Petronski
bump
697
posted on
02/11/2004 8:39:11 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(NFL Fatcats: Grown men don't watch hollywood strip shows with wives and children.)
To: CyberAnt
If I may, can I put in a good word for the Washington Times. Not only it the paper where you can read Cal Thomas, Ollie North, and Bill Gertz, but it is to newspapers, as Fox News is to ABCCBSNBC! It is conservative and it is so refreshing to read - I consider it the new paper "of record" since the New York Times has become birdcage fodder.
And if you FReepmail, I can tell you how to get a good deal on a subscription to the paper! Really, really good deal.
698
posted on
02/11/2004 8:40:35 PM PST
by
TruthNtegrity
(I refuse to call candidates for President "Democratic" as they are NOT. Socialists, actually.))
To: afraidfortherepublic
"NOW, what do you say? Never mind, I don't want to know. YOu made a real a$$ out of yourself yesterday."
I made an a$$ of myself by asking questions that will be asked by the press anyway? Shouldn't Bush be pleased that the questions are being asked right now than the last weekend as happened in 2000 that almost certainly deprived him of a popular vote victory? Let's get this behind ourselves now sooner rather than later. If there is nothing here, then it will be completely forgotten by election date. Meanwhile Kerry has the written word to deal with.
You are taking this much too personally. I thought this was the mark of the Democrats to take things personally. I thought they were the touchy-feely types. Am I wrong?
To: Petronski
Pass the word.
700
posted on
02/11/2004 8:44:50 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson