Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

60% of polled Americans: No homosexual marriage
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, February 10, 2004

Posted on 02/10/2004 2:04:46 AM PST by JohnHuang2

LAW OF THE LAND
60% of polled Americans:
No homosexual marriage

Latest survey shows residents rejecting same-sex matrimony by 2-to-1 margin


Posted: February 9, 2004
5:00 p.m. Eastern


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

A new poll shows a majority of Americans do not want state laws that would make same-sex marriage legal.

The survey was taken after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court said last Wednesday in an advisory opinion same-sex couples are entitled to marriage and not an alternative, such as Vermont-style civil unions. Only full and equal marriage rights will fulfill its November ruling, four of the seven judges said, paving the way for the nation's first "gay" weddings in mid-May.

The high court decided Nov. 18 homosexual couples are legally entitled to wed under the state constitution. However, the 4-3 November ruling stopped short of declaring homosexual couples should be granted the license, ordering the state legislature to come up with a solution within 180 days. Last week's opinion was a response to a request by the state Senate about whether civil unions, which accord many of the rights and privileges of marriage, would be sufficient.

According to the new poll, Americans are against any law legalizing same-sex marriage by a 2-1 margin, 60 percent to 31 percent.

The survey by the National Annenberg Election Survey showed less support, however, for a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages.

The poll indicated 49 percent are opposed to such an amendment and 42 percent are in favor.

In their advisory opinion, the four justices who ruled in favor of same-sex marriage wrote: "The history of our nation has demonstrated that separate is seldom, if ever, equal. The bill that would allow for civil unions, but falls short of marriage, makes for "unconstitutional, inferior, and discriminatory status for same-sex couples."

With the ruling, the Massachusetts legislature is now set to consider an amendment legally defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

However, a constitutional amendment could not be brought before a vote of the people until 2006.

Last week, Ohio became the 38th state to pass a law that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.

"We've heard from the court, but not from the people," Gov. Mitt Romney said in a statement last week. "The people of Massachusetts should not be excluded from a decision as fundamental to our society as the definition of marriage."

Some state Republican chairmen who met at the Republican National Committee in Washington one week ago said they want the White House and the Bush re-election campaign to put more emphasis on the president's opposition to same-sex marriage.

"It's clearly important to our base, along with the president's tax cuts that helped the economy recover nationally," Virginia state Chairman Kate O. Griffin told the Washington Times.

President Bush's spokesman, Scott McClellan, said today the White House is reviewing the issue but indicated an amendment might be necessary.

"If activist judges continue to try to redefine marriage, without regard to the voice of the people, then the only alternative will be a constitutional process," he said.

Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic front-runner for president, said last week he is opposed to same-sex marriage.

"I believe and have fought for the principle that we should protect the fundamental rights of gay and lesbian couples – from inheritance to health benefits," he said. "I believe the right answer is civil unions. I oppose gay marriage and disagree with the Massachusetts court's decision."

Last month, a Zogby International poll showed a majority of Massachusetts residents oppose the high court's November decision.

The survey also indicated most respondents favor a constitutional amendment to protect matrimony as the union of one man and one woman.

According to the Zogby poll, 69 percent of respondents wanted to vote on an amendment to keep Massachusetts a traditional marriage state. Also, 52 percent vs. 42 percent agreed only marriage between one man and one woman should be legal and binding in America.

Additionally, more than two-thirds, or 69 percent, believed it is better for children to be raised in a household with a married mother and father.

"It seems the more people consider the long-term impact of homosexual marriage on the family and society, the more they oppose homosexual marriage," said Ron Crews, spokesman for the Coalition for Marriage, a non-partisan state and nationwide alliance of supporters of traditional marriage.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2004polls; civilunion; electionpolls; homosexualmarriage; marriage; nationalannenberg; poll
Tuesday, February 10, 2004

Quote of the Day by Milligan

1 posted on 02/10/2004 2:04:47 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I am SHOCKED that its that low

I think if people understood what it will do to our culture and country it would be much higher

2 posted on 02/10/2004 2:08:14 AM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
But the same folks opposed to gay marriage also don't want to stop judges intent on foisting it upon them. Go figure.
3 posted on 02/10/2004 2:09:26 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The real question is whether this matters to you. Is this a "dealbreaker" issue. I submit for the majority given a choice between a kerry who would support homosexual marriages (see his speech before the HumanRightsCoalition, the homosexual marriage group) and Bush who does not support homsexual marriage (and has come out explicitly stating marraige is one man and one woman.); the decision is easy. The key is to make the contrast between the two, reapeatedly at every opportunity.
4 posted on 02/10/2004 2:37:06 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Only 60 percent?
5 posted on 02/10/2004 2:42:16 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The senate president's e-mail address:

Robert.Travaglini@state.ma.us

Penny

6 posted on 02/10/2004 3:07:14 AM PST by Penny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Seems low to me too, but I didn't see the wording...
7 posted on 02/10/2004 4:53:09 AM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Isn't it amazing to say that 42% of America is gay. That means that approx every other man that I pass on the street is looking at my butt.
8 posted on 02/10/2004 5:03:55 AM PST by garylmoore (It is as it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor
"Only 60 percent?"

That sounds about right considering that 30% are dems and the other 10% are the perpetually confused/clueless.
9 posted on 02/10/2004 5:48:30 AM PST by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is really a non-issue, cooked up by the news media to boost ratings.

Ever notice that they (the news media) tend to come up with these "issues" that are designed to either polarize or frighten the public, usually during a slow news cycle?

Some examples:

Road rage - Remember all the hubbub over this "problem" a few years back? Well, it was all based on BS. The whole thing was created by "reporters" looking for a "story" to spice up the 6 o'clock news.

Saccharin - Scientists shove Herculean amounts of the artificial sweetener saccharin into the bellies of some lab mice. The lab mice get cancer, and the media goes into a frenzy. But what they didn't tell us is that the amounts fed to the mice were the equivalent of tons of the stuff being fed to a human.

Health scares - Every time some lone researcher cooks up a "scientific" theory about this or that common substance causing horrendous health problems, the media is right there, standing ready to trumpet the results as gospel truth before there is the slightest shred of peer review or attempts to replicate the results.

Same thing with the whole "gay marriage" bowl of crap. Most people are either opposed to it, or (like myself) just don't give a rat's heiney. But that doesn't stop the news media from passing this latest "issue" off as being of dire import to the well-being of our Republic. We've got bigger things to worry about than whether or not gays (the tiniest splinter of a minority to begin with) have the right to everything that comes with marital bliss, like infidelity, in-laws, divorce, etc.

10 posted on 02/10/2004 7:19:38 AM PST by FierceDraka (Service and Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson