Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Autism and Vaccines [WSJ Editorial]
Wall Street Journal ^ | Feb 9, 2004 | editorial

Posted on 02/09/2004 2:29:07 AM PST by The Raven

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Everyone in our business learns to take a punch, but even we've been surprised by the furious response to an editorial we ran a few weeks ago about vaccines. The subject deserves further attention, not least because the goal of our antagonists appears to be to shut down public debate on the matter.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: autism; health; thimerosal; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2004 2:29:08 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
See also When Judges Play Doctor
2 posted on 02/09/2004 2:33:55 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
The threats come from distraught parents and their thug trial lawyers.

There is big money for the shysters if they can pull off this scam. This is why they are trying to get distorted junk science accepted as evidence, in order to scam their multi-million dollar lottery "jackpot justice."

The intimidation of legitimate research is to craft the junk science to meet something called the Daubert Rule of evidence. This is therefore a coordinated campaign against the WSJ and others.

3 posted on 02/09/2004 2:37:04 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
This quite possibly could be an example of a meme. An idea that exists for no reason at all, but is good at replicating itself in the minds of humans. In this case, emotion is the source of its replication energy.
4 posted on 02/09/2004 2:38:47 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Seminar callers???? That's what I thought as well.
5 posted on 02/09/2004 2:49:51 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Certainly is coordinated thuggery.
6 posted on 02/09/2004 3:03:56 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
bttt
7 posted on 02/09/2004 3:11:11 AM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Like the type of person who would endlessly discuss how the dairy industry is poisoning milk, who adamantly refuses to drink it because it will cause cancer, and all the while smoking a cigarette. My sister had done this and was outed on the spot!
8 posted on 02/09/2004 3:29:11 AM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I don't know anything about autism, and my kids both had their vaccinations with no problems, but I do have some experience with thimerosol. I reacted badly to it the first time I put in my contact lenses many years ago. Seems that preservative caused my eyes to get so bloodshot that I had to return to the doctor. My reaction necessitated an immediate change in solutions. The doctor told me that something like 20% of people couldn't use the solution for the same reason--sensitivity to the preservative. That was around 30 years ago. Now the cleaning/storage/drops aren't made with that preservative very often. And, it's not uncommon to find it listed on the box "contains no thimerosol" (or at least that used to be the case. I no longer wear contact lenses.)

While it does sound extreme to me, because of my reaction to thimerosol in contact lense use, it isn't too much a stretch for me to believe that there COULD be people who are more sensitive than I am who could have a worse reaction. If my eyes became extremely bloodshot and painful with simple solution use, perhaps some poor child reacted badly with an inflamation of the brain causing autism--due to being injected. Understand--I do support vaccinations--but it's the thimerosol use that could persuade me that there is a real possibility of a reaction.

9 posted on 02/09/2004 3:44:47 AM PST by Marty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty
Sorry about your experience with the drug. There are reactions to every medicine, no matter how ordinary. I feel sorry for these parents, desperate for some solace in knowing why the autism occurred, and also falling victim to lawyers' greed.
10 posted on 02/09/2004 4:10:35 AM PST by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
There are two groups of anti-vaccine parents:

Those who abstain for religious reasons and

The PETA crowd, who do the whole vegetarian thing, which includes "building the immune system naturally". They ignore the fact that modern science and modern health styles have lead to radically extended lifetimes; They ride disease free on the wave of those who are vaccinated; And they despise "pharmacuetical companies" who are "big business".

Look at the success they have had stomping out down drug companies.
11 posted on 02/09/2004 4:10:35 AM PST by TaxRelief (Nov. 2nd is a great day to take a personal day to help watch the polls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
This article fails to address the huge rise in autism diagnoses, all about the same time.

Thimerosol may not be the culprit. But something most certainly is. And the move toward infant vaccination did occur at about that time.

WSJ does not, in this article at least, give a credible accounting of the facts as they are known.

This is a pro-pharmaceuticals hit-piece, more about pharm profits than public health.
12 posted on 02/09/2004 4:24:56 AM PST by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
"WSJ does not, in this article at least, give a credible accounting of the facts as they are known. This is a pro-pharmaceuticals hit-piece, more about pharm profits than public health."


Hardly. The WSJ isn't trying to give a credible accounting of the facts in an editorial. There's plenty of other accounts elsewhere; this is an editorial. It isn't a pro-pharma hit piece at all. And statistics can be your enemy: the huge rise in diagnoses coincided with the shift away from leaded gasoline too. More accurately, the rise in diagnoses was the result of greater awareness and regular reporting to public health authorities, which indicated a statistical uptick. We have no idea whether there were greater or fewer cases before the 1970s.

I witnessed the hysteria (and I don't use that word lightly) in Britain in 2002 when the medical community and government insisted that the MMR vaccines were safe and the ignorant parents insisted on avoiding any M, M or R vaccines. Within weeks the measels cases got out of control in South London through the day care centers. Is it really worth the quite large risk of getting measels, mumps or rubella and endangering the child's life on a rumor that the medical community (not just big pharma) has shown to be false?

Wired Magazine had a good piece several years ago pointing out that the largest cases of Autism in the United States are centered in two places: the Silicon Valley area and Rochester, New York. The scientists their reporter spoke to suggested that there could very well be a genetic link to mathematic aptitude not vaccination.
13 posted on 02/09/2004 5:13:45 AM PST by Herodotus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Herodotus
More accurately, the rise in diagnoses was the result of greater awareness and regular reporting to public health authorities, which indicated a statistical uptick. We have no idea whether there were greater or fewer cases before the 1970s.

The real bust in autism came well after the Seventies. And severe autism is pretty unmistakable to doctors who treat such children.

The 'geek-inbreeding' theory has more merit than anything besides the vaccines theory.

In the end, it will come down to these two, I think.
14 posted on 02/09/2004 5:17:10 AM PST by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Herodotus
In addition, if the vaccines are no threat but the thimerosol is considered a hazard (with a mercury content many times higher than anything allowed in adult vaccines), then why not eliminate the thimerosol, merely a preservative?

The individual increase in costs for producing vaccine with shorter shelf life would greatly outweigh the problems with leaving children unvaccinated.

The pharm companies are acting very strangely on this issue. Their behavior is like a guilty party for no good reason. It's like they're delaying litigation they know will succeed.

Ban the thimerosol. We'd know in about three years. And parents would have a lot less incentive to leave their children unvaccinated.
15 posted on 02/09/2004 5:21:53 AM PST by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Interesting article and comments bump.
16 posted on 02/09/2004 5:27:05 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
I love how you totally discount that group of people whose children or relatives have been severely injured by vaccines....which group includes my nephew, who was severely brain damaged by a DPT shot, and went from a highly intelligent child to a seizure plagued child who could no longer talk virtually overnight. He is now 20, and functions on the level of a three year old.

MY kids are not vaccinated.
17 posted on 02/09/2004 5:30:45 AM PST by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
A little back ground on Thimerosal (mercury). The amount included in the typical vaccines an infant receives only exceeds the EPA guidelins by 125 times. Not 125%, 125 times.

More than 60 years ago, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a little-known product, thimerosal, to be used as a preservative. Today, many parents question if this product is responsible for the current epidemic of children diagnosed with learning disabilities and autism.

Thimerosal

Current thinking suggests that exposure to mercury comes primarily from environmental and dietary sources, dental amalgams, and rare catastrophic events. Recently, however, another common and pervasive source of mercury exposure has been identified. Called thimerosal, it was first approved as an additive by the FDA in the 1930s and has been utilized as a preservative to prevent bacterial contamination in a number of blood and biological products, including vaccines, immune globulins, and over-the-counter eye and nose drops. The Danger thimerosal presents is that it contains 49.5 percent ethyl mercury by weight. Mercury is a potent human toxicant and has long been the source of many serious health problems. It is especially toxic to the rapidly developing fetal and infant brain. Federal agencies have published acceptable levels for exposure; but in actual fact mercury is a poison at any level. Chemically, thimerosal is a water-soluble, cream-colored crystalline powder. In the human body it is metabolized to ethyl mercury and thiosalicylate. The literature on thimerosal metabolism and excretion is old, and toxicological information is limited. In the past there have been case reports of toxicity and death following inadvertent massive exposures to thimerosal.

The FDA's Discovery

The FDA Modernization Act, signed into law in 1997, included an amendment requiring the agency to compile a list of drugs and foods that contain intentionally introduced mercury compounds and to provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the mercury compounds on the list. One may ask why the FDA did not routinely perform this task. The FDA's mission is to ensure purity, safety, potency, and efficacy of individual products, yet such analyses have never been a required part of the permitting process. In its review, which took two years to complete, the FDA discovered that infants who receive vaccines containing thimerosal may be exposed to more mercury than recommended by federal guidelines for total mercury exposure.

Infant vaccines that routinely contained thimerosal were DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus), hepatitis B, and Hib (Hemophilus influenzae type b). Following the vaccination schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), infants were exposed to anywhere from 0.0 to 187.5 mcg of ethyl mercury, depending on the vaccine manufacturer, and total exposure over 18 months could be as high as 237.5 mcg. The dose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) deems allowable is 0.1 mcg per kilogram per day. If an average 5 kg-infant received all thimerosal-containing vaccines at his two-month visit, his exposure that day would be 62.5 mcg ethyl mercury--125 times as great as the EPA guideline.

In its analysis, the FDA multiplied EPA's daily exposure levels of 0.1 mcg per kilogram by 180 days, even though the exposures had occurred on only four days during this time period. It is perplexing that the FDA chose to average an infant's total exposure to mercury over the first six months of life as though children were being exposed on a daily basis, and reported that amounts were only slightly above one of the federal guidelines. According to toxicologists, because of the inherent pharmokinetics of mercury and its long half-life in the body, the effect of a large injected dose cannot be calculated as though it were ingested in small amounts over a longer period of time. This method of analysis inaccurately minimizes the levels of exposure. If one were to look at the mercury in thimerosal from a daily dose perspective, no one vaccine containing thimerosal would meet EPA's guidelines for safe exposure. A simple analogy can be made that since one may safely consume four Tylenol a day in six-hour intervals for a month, consuming 120 Tylenol in one day would be equally safe. (In fact, it would be a fatal dose.) At the same time the FDA findings were released, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published an interim report to physicians on thimerosal in vaccines. In the report, the AAP and Public Health Service agreed that the use of thimerosal-containing vaccines should be reduced or eliminated, stating that any potential risk was of concern. While this report discussed much of the uncertainty regarding the potential effect of mercury exposure in vaccines, it clearly stated that there was no evidence of harm having occurred from such exposure. The report also said, "Infants and children who have received thimerosal-containing vaccines do not need to have blood, urine, or hair tested for mercury since the concentrations would be quite low and would not require treatment." Without such tests, of course, it was impossible to know for a fact that there was no "evidence of harm." Historical Perspective It is interesting to note that thimerosal was introduced only a few years before Leo Kanner, MD, described a new mental disorder that differed "markedly and uniquely from anything reported" before. In its early history autism was diagnosed more frequently in affluent families, but by the 1970s it had become more evenly distributed socioeconomically. This apparent widening in demographics paralleled the increasing availability of vaccines to all children through federally sponsored programs. The 1980s and especially the 1990s saw a tremendous increase in the occurrence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the vaccine schedule was amended to include both hepatitis B and Hib vaccines, each administered to infants three times during the first six months of life. Their addition to the vaccine schedule potentially tripled an infant's exposure to mercury, should he receive all thimerosal-containing vaccines. An additional concern is that these vaccine exposures occur on top of prenatal exposures from immune globulin preparations (administered during pregnancy to Rh- mothers) and from dietary, dental, and environmental exposures.

Current Investigations

Recent information from large epidemiological studies conducted in mercury-exposed populations suggests that intermittent large exposures may pose more risk than daily small exposures. One study investigated children who had suffered prenatal exposure to intermittent bolus doses of methyl mercury (found in fish) via the mothers' diets. The exposure level was thought to be safe at the time. However, when evaluated years later, the children were found to have lower scores on memory, attention, language, and motor function tests.

In a recent investigation, mercury levels were obtained before and after exposure to 12.5 mcg of ethyl mercury in hepatitis B vaccine in 15 preterm and 5 term infants. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to mean prevaccination levels, although postvaccination mercury levels were significantly increased in both groups of infants. Postvaccination levels in preterm infants were three times higher than those of term infants, a difference that was statistically significant. One preterm infant developed a postvaccinal mercury level of 23.6 mcg per liter, which falls within the range known to result in neurodevelopmental dysfunction. At the June 21, 2000, meeting of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, held in Atlanta, Thomas Verstraeten of the National Immunization Program presented a review of vaccine safety datalink information on thimerosal-containing vaccines. Over 400,000 children participate in the vaccine safety datalink program. From this database, 100,000 charts were reviewed to determine exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines and specific neurodevelopmental outcomes. Statistically significant associations were found between cumulative exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines at two months of age and unspecified developmental delay; three months of age and tics; six months of age and attention deficit disorder; one, three, and six months of age and speech and language delay and neurodevelopmental delays in general. According to a report in the Weekly Epidemiology Record that reviewed the use of thimerosal as a vaccine preservative, "This safety assessment cannot currently exclude the possibility of subtle neurodevelopmental abnormalities in infants from a cumulative exposure to thimerosal in vaccines."

What Next?

Among the many unknowns about thimerosal are a paucity of data on the metabolism, excretion, and toxicity of ethyl mercury; the levels of risk to the fetus from maternal exposures and to the infant from exposure occurring during critical windows of neurological development; and the effect of large intermittent bolus exposures to ethyl mercury compared to daily low-dose oral exposures to methyl mercury. These concerns are being addressed in investigations by governmental and private agencies.

There appears to be no general consensus as to how best to diagnose and treat elevated mercury levels in children. The effectiveness of chelating agents in crossing the blood-brain barrier has become a topic of scrutiny, along with the possibility of treating a long-standing exposure that occurred during a critical time in development. At a recent conference, a number of physicians who specialize in the treatment of autism and developmental disorders reported finding many children with elevated mercury levels who had remarkable improvement in behaviors, speech, and cognition when treated with a program to reduce oxidative stress and metal body burden.8

What To Do

Despite this information, the FDA has only "encouraged" vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal. Until there is more research assuring its safe use in infants, it would only be prudent to give preference to all thimerosal-free vaccines. Writing about thimerosal, Neal Halsey of the Johns Hopkins University Institute for Vaccine Safety stated, "We can say there is no evidence of harm, but the truth is no one has looked."9 Numerous vaccine products containing thimerosal are still on the market. Both the general public and health care providers need to be aware of the availability of vaccine products with and without thimerosal. Parents research the safest car seats and toys for their children but do not realize that they need to research vaccines as well. Thimerosal has been eliminated from latex paints, Merthiolate, and many other products because of its serious toxic effects on infants. Although the FDA has only focused on thimerosal in infant vaccines at this time, all vaccines that contain this product should come under scrutiny in the near future.

NOTES 1. American Academy of Pediatrics, "Thimerosal in Vaccines: An Interim Report to Clinicians," www.aap.org/new/thimpublic.htm, accessed October 18, 1999. 2. L. Kanner, "Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact," The Nervous Child 2, no. 3 (1942-1943): 217-250. 3. P. Grandjean et al., "Cognitive Performance of Children Prenatally Exposed to 'Safe' Levels of Methylmercury," Environ. Res. 77 (1998): 165-172. 4. G. Stajich et al., "Iatrogenic Exposure to Mercury after Hepatitis B Vaccination in Preterm Infants," J. Pediatrics 136, no. 5 (2000): 679-681. 5. P. Grandjean, et al., "Methylmercury: Significance of Intrauterine and Postnatal Exposures," Clin. Chem. 40, no. 7 (1994): 1395-1400. 6. P. Stehr-Green, "Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information on Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines," presentation to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, June 7-8, 2000. 7. "Thimerosal as a Vaccine Preservative," Wkly. Epi. Rec. 75, no. 2 (2000): 12-16. 8. Defeat Autism Now conference, Boston, Spring 2002. 9. "Uproar Over a Little-Known Preservative, Thimerosal, Jostles US Hepatitis B Vaccination Policy," Hep. Control Rep. 4, no. 2 (Summer 1999). FOR MORE INFORMATION Books Cave, Stephanie, MD. What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations. Warner Books, 2001. Hamilton, Lynn M. Facing Autism: Giving Parents Reasons for Hope and Guidance for Help. Waterbrook Press, 2000. McCandless, Jaquelyn, MD. Children with Starving Brains: A Medical Treatment Guide for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Bramble Company, 2002. Maurice, Catherine. Let Me Hear Your Voice: A Family's Triumph Over Autism. Fawcett Books, 1994. Paradi, Valerie. Elijah's Cup: A Family's Journey into the Community and Culture of High-Functioning Autism and Asperger's Syndrome. Free Press, 2002. Seroussi, Karyn. Unraveling the Mystery of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorder: A Mother's Story of Research & Recovery. Simon & Schuster, 2000. Waites, Junee and Helen Swinbourne. Smiling at Shadows: A Mother's Journey Raising an Autistic Child. Ulysses Press, 2002. Websites www.autismresearchinstitute.com www.autism-mercury.com www.canfoundation.org www.safeminds.org www.909shot.com For additional information on autism, see the following articles in past issues of Mothering: "Show Us the Science," no. 105 and "Promising Approaches," no. 100. Lyn Redwood RN, MSN, CRNP, is a writer, researcher, and president of SAFEMINDs (Sensible Action For Ending Mercury Induced Neurological Disorders). She has three children, Hanna, Drew, and Will.

18 posted on 02/09/2004 5:51:55 AM PST by handy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I Googled "autism definition" and was presented with a long list. This element showed up in several definitions: autism "occurs in approximately 15 out of every 10,000 births and is four times more prevalent in males than females. It occurs throughout the world in families of all racial, ethnic, and social backgrounds."

Thimerosal, however, is not used "throughout the world in families of all racial, ethnic and social backgrounds." It may be dangerous stuff, but it can't "cause" autism where it is not used. If the autism rate is effectively the same whether or not thimerosal is used, then it is not the causal agent.

19 posted on 02/09/2004 6:19:30 AM PST by T'wit (For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Herodotus; George W. Bush

Food Coloring?


Food coloring also came into wide use at the same time.
20 posted on 02/09/2004 7:18:14 AM PST by TaxRelief (Nov. 2nd is a great day to take a personal day to help watch the polls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson