Skip to comments.
More judiciary memos await
Washington Times ^
| 2/09/04
| Charles Hurt
Posted on 02/08/2004 11:54:09 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Republicans have "perhaps thousands" of internal Democratic judiciary memos like the 14 that caused a stir on Capitol Hill last fall, says a Republican staffer who resigned after an investigation into how the documents were obtained.
"Only a small amount of [documents downloaded from Democratic computer servers] have been made public," said Manuel Miranda, former judicial-nominations counsel to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee. "The ones made public are the least indicting of the ones."
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 3branchesofgovt; affirmativeaction; collusionmemos; conflictofinterest; dirtypolitics; estradamemo; judicialactivism; judicialbranch; judicialdecisions; judicialnominees; judiciarycommittee; kennedy; legislativebrance; manuelmiranda; memogate; michigan; naacp; rattricks; teddykennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/08/2004 11:54:09 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Wholly smoke, shared dekstops..?? That’s doesn't require any technical knowledge, merely curiosity. No hackers needed, only "browsers"...
To: kattracks
Memogate BUMP
The memo generating much of the consternation was written to Mr. Kennedy urging him — at the behest of an attorney for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People — to stall a nominee to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals until that panel had ruled on a landmark affirmative-action case.
Sounds like the NAACP could be putting their 501(c)3 tax status in jeopardy with such actions.
Additionally the Democrats should be exposed for trying to circumvent the 3 branches of government and craft the Judicial decisions that some in the Legislative Branch want by deliberately stalling the vote.
3
posted on
02/09/2004 12:26:36 AM PST
by
weegee
To: Texas_Jarhead
Additionally all data on those systems was property of the government, not a "party".
4
posted on
02/09/2004 12:27:30 AM PST
by
weegee
To: kattracks; All
5
posted on
02/09/2004 1:32:59 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: kattracks
Where is the media on this issue? They're all in the demos pocket. Janet is NOT, REPEAT NOT, more important to the country than this.
6
posted on
02/09/2004 3:33:18 AM PST
by
PROUDAMREP
(UNITE FOR BUSH IN '04)
To: kattracks
Hehehe. The Washington Times doesn't seem to be in any hurry with this. "Feels" like there's lots more to come (he said hopefully).
7
posted on
02/09/2004 4:26:33 AM PST
by
Stultis
To: PROUDAMREP
Where is the media on this issue? They're all in the demos pocket. Janet is NOT, REPEAT NOT, more important to the country than this. Roll Call has an article on this this morning but you have to subscribe to read it.
Tim Curran of Roll Call was just on C-SPAN and mentioned it. Knowing Roll Call, the article is probably a white-wash although he did say that the "staffer" who read the memos is thinking of writing a book about them.
8
posted on
02/09/2004 5:41:11 AM PST
by
jackbill
To: kattracks
""The ones made public are the least indicting of the ones." Free the Memos! please....
9
posted on
02/09/2004 7:37:13 AM PST
by
eureka!
(The ongoing destruction of the Rat party is giving me smile wrinkles.....)
To: Texas_Jarhead
Wholly smoke, shared dekstops..??This was done by a consultant hired by the democrats. File sharing in Windows is completely voluntary, and you can easily limit it to a list of users. There is no excuse for anyone or any group that allows unlimited access to files.
I supposed that a gifted and determined hacker could get past ordinary security, but that's not what happened here. The dems simply allowed anyone to see their files.
10
posted on
02/09/2004 7:46:39 AM PST
by
js1138
To: diotima; ConservativeGadfly; jmstein7; Interesting Times; Nick Danger
The ones made public are the least indicting of the ones." Ping! Free the Miranda memos!
11
posted on
02/09/2004 8:21:37 AM PST
by
abner
(In search of a witty tag line... found it! http://www.intelmemo.com < go there or be square!)
To: abner
LOL! Can you say PERP WALK? I knew you could!
12
posted on
02/09/2004 8:26:43 AM PST
by
diotima
To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom
Who let the dogs memos out?.........
13
posted on
02/09/2004 8:26:54 AM PST
by
deport
(BUSH - CHENEY 2004 ..... 268 days until Tuesday 2 November - General Election)
To: abner
I just changed my tagline........
14
posted on
02/09/2004 8:27:40 AM PST
by
diotima
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS!!!!!!!)
To: deport
If the 14 memos that were already revealed are the LEAST
"indicting" (interesting choice of words, don't you think?)
there must be some real incriminating stuff in the remaining couple of thousand!
15
posted on
02/09/2004 8:31:33 AM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Free The Judiciary Committee Memos!)
To: diotima
PERP WALK... That wasn't too hard. Let me see, can I say it again? Hmmmm.... PERP WALK!
16
posted on
02/09/2004 8:34:32 AM PST
by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com < go there or be square!)
To: kattracks
Many of us have long wondered if *any* criminal malfeasance by Congressional Democrats would lead to the perps actually going to jail.
This may be our opportunity to find out.
To: MamaLucci
Maybe they can begin a release program entitled 'outing .. the memo of the month '
18
posted on
02/09/2004 8:39:35 AM PST
by
deport
(BUSH - CHENEY 2004 ..... 267 days until Tuesday 2 November)
To: Interesting Times
I wonder if the Repubs kept their memos private? If they didn't, that would probably explain why they don't want this to come out. Either way, I say bring em on!
19
posted on
02/09/2004 8:41:50 AM PST
by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com < go there or be square!)
To: deport
If there are 'thousands' it would have to be "Memos of the day".
20
posted on
02/09/2004 8:42:35 AM PST
by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com < go there or be square!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
