Skip to comments.
Women's group: Bush's Marriage-promotion Program Discriminates
Newark Star Ledger ^
| 02.06.04
Posted on 02/07/2004 2:04:41 PM PST by Coleus
Edited on 07/06/2004 6:39:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A womens group fired the first legal salvo against the Bush administration's marriage-promotion agenda yesterday, filing a civil rights complaint that a government-funded program discriminates against women.
The NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund charged that a pro-marriage program, the Family Formation and Development Project in Allentown, Pa., provides employment services to males only. That constitutes a violation of Title IX, the group claims, because the law prohibits discrimination based on gender in any government-funded program.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bush43; discrimination; faith; father; feminazi; feminism; feminists; headstart; husband; male; man; marriage; men; nag; nags; now; pa; title9; titleix; traditionalmarriage; women
Yea, such a terrible thing to promote marriage to low-income individuals so they can become self sufficent, working and productive citizens where thier children can grow up in a proper environment with a father and mother.
1
posted on
02/07/2004 2:04:42 PM PST
by
Coleus
2
posted on
02/07/2004 2:06:51 PM PST
by
Coleus
(STOPP Planned Parenthood http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/892053/posts)
To: Coleus
I'm for most of the stuff the NOW hags are against.
3
posted on
02/07/2004 2:19:35 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: Coleus
money would be better spent to help poor, unmarried women find jobs and pay for child care. We've been doing that for years, and still are. The whole welfare system is about just that.
Isn't it time we spent some money on helping men who would like to become responsible husbands and fathers?
Naah. What was I thinking? Men aren't necessary.
To: Coleus
Feminazis think its sexist for poor married men to work to suppport their women and children. But its equality for them to be lazy bums on welfare. <sarcasm
5
posted on
02/07/2004 3:23:32 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Coleus
I used to wonder but now I think Rush hit it square on the head, "Femminism was started to allow ugly women better access to mainstream society".
Next time you see a NAG just call her sweetie and tell her to get back in the kitchen pronto. Be sure to be out of arms reach. ;-)
6
posted on
02/07/2004 3:23:48 PM PST
by
festus
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
`
7
posted on
02/08/2004 5:20:48 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Vote for Bush and Traditional Marriage; http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4205947/)
To: Coleus
A womens group fired the first legal salvo against the Bush administration's marriage-promotion agenda yesterday, filing a civil rights complaint that a government-funded program discriminates against women.The Feminazis don't like it? Now there's a surprise! /sarcasm
8
posted on
02/08/2004 5:32:50 PM PST
by
SuziQ
To: Coleus
Excellent collection there, friend. I am so tired of man-bashing. It just breaks my heart.
Women need to love and be there for their men. My opinion!
9
posted on
02/08/2004 5:40:21 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: SuziQ
"The Feminazis don't like it? Now there's a surprise! /sarcasm"
They're just mad because THEIR guy (Bill Clinton) was too busy sexually abusing women to come up with any policies to help women!
To: Coleus
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson