Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

perhaps this has been posted under a different title - Romney has outlined a great argument IMO.
1 posted on 02/06/2004 6:51:20 AM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rface

2 posted on 02/06/2004 6:52:17 AM PST by counterpunch (click my name to check out my 'toons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
I read this in yesterday's Wall Street Journal editorial page. Good stuff. Mitt Romney is a beacon of hope in a desolate, lost world.
3 posted on 02/06/2004 6:57:15 AM PST by Dalan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
I think this was in the Wall Street Journal today too.

Great article. Great job Mitt. I didn't think he had the guts. He's a personally-opposed-but abortion supporter.

4 posted on 02/06/2004 7:01:47 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
This can't be from a politician. It's too well-written, too concise, too intelligent, and too clear.

ABOUT FREAKING TIME we had a politician who defends our system of government -- separation of powers and all that.

The ULTIMATE check and balance on political power is the PEOPLE! In the end, the PEOPLE decide the great questions of our country through the ballot box -- or, in the case of slavery, through civil war. We CANNOT and WILL NOT accept a judicial tyranny in this country!
6 posted on 02/06/2004 7:04:01 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (DUBYA - ROMNEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Talk is cheap. He should defy those black robed tyrants. They have no right to legislate from the bench. But he won't. Like Joe Lieberman, he'll cry crocodile tears for justice, then roll over.
9 posted on 02/06/2004 7:36:58 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Ping


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0)
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

12 posted on 02/06/2004 9:02:59 AM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
By its decision, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts circumvented the Legislature and the executive, and assumed to itself the power of legislating. That is wrong.

Bingo. It's legislating from the bench and patently unconstitutional. Does anyone know if this one is being passed up to SCOTUS?

13 posted on 02/06/2004 9:05:22 AM PST by lawgirl (God to womankind: "Here's Cary Grant. Now don't say I never gave you anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Marriage should be defined by the people: Op-ED by Massachusetts Governor

Isn't this like something from THRU THE LOOKING GLASS?

"A word will mean what I want it to mean..."


(or was that a Clintonian invention??)

14 posted on 02/06/2004 9:09:27 AM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Sometimes we forget that the ultimate power in our democracy is not in the Supreme Court but rather in the voice of the people. And the people have the exclusive right to protect their nation and Constitution from judicial overreaching.

I love my Guv!

Thanks for posting this, rface.

15 posted on 02/06/2004 9:30:38 AM PST by betty boop (God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world. -- Paul Dirac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
As a result, marriage bears a real relation to the .well-being, health and enduring strength of society.

That is EXACTLY why it is under attack. The enemies of our society and civilization are using our compassion against us with their bogus pleas for 'fairness' and 'equality'.

16 posted on 02/06/2004 10:49:58 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Hate to diss Romney's ideas, but marriage has already been defined.

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church

1660 The marriage covenant, by which a man and a woman form with each other an intimate communion of life and love, has been founded and endowed with its own special laws by the Creator. By its very nature it is ordered to the good of the couple, as well as to the generation and education of children. Christ the Lord raised marriage between the baptized to the dignity of a sacrament (cf. CIC, can. 1055 § 1; cf. GS 48 § 1).


1625 The parties to a marriage covenant are a baptized man and woman, free to contract marriage, who freely express their consent; "to be free" means:

- not being under constraint;

- not impeded by any natural or ecclesiastical law.




19 posted on 02/06/2004 7:18:19 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Marriage should be defined by the people:

"And every man did what was right in his own eyes..."

23 posted on 02/06/2004 9:57:20 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson