Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leak staffer ousted Frist aide forced out in an effort to assuage Dems By Alexander Bolton
The Hill ^ | 02-05-04

Posted on 02/05/2004 8:36:00 AM PST by MamaLucci

Leak staffer ousted

Frist aide forced out in an effort to assuage Dems

By Alexander Bolton

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s (R-Tenn.) top aide on judicial nominees is expected to announce his resignation at the end of this week — a sacrifice offered by the GOP leadership in hope of persuading the Democrats to wind down the fight over leaked Judiciary Committee memos.

The aide, Manuel Miranda, had spearheaded the Republican effort to push President Bush’s judicial nominees through the Senate in the face of fierce Democratic opposition.

Miranda declined a request for comment. But The Hill has learned that he agreed to resign under pressure from Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). The Democrats have not agreed to scale back their demands for wide-ranging punishments following a full-blown leak inquiry.

Since switching from the Judiciary Committee to Frist’s office in February last year, Miranda had overseen a multi-pronged strategy to confirm judges whom Democrats had blocked with filibusters and other procedural tactics.

Miranda helped galvanize the Senate Republican caucus and outside constituent groups such as Hispanics and Catholics behind the nominees. In previous years, most of the Senate Republican caucus, apart from members of the Judiciary Committee, remained aloof from the fight.

The aide’s departure signals that Senate Republican leaders will likely pull back from confrontation over Bush’s judges. Last year’s high-intensity battles included a GOP-staged 40-hour marathon debate on blocked nominees.

As an aide in Frist’s office, Miranda was able to organize the Judiciary Committee with outside groups that communicated the Republican message on judges. Without the heft of Frist’s office behind the campaign to confirm Bush’s judges, the Senate Republican Conference, will have a tough time overcoming turf battles with the committee.

If they can tamp down the furor over the leaked memos, Republicans could focus on the content of the documents, which illustrate the influence outside groups such as the NAACP and People for the American Way have had on Democratic decisions to block nominees.

“It’s capitulation to the old Democratic trick that if you catch us with our hands dirty, we’ll blame Republicans for dirty tricks,” said a GOP aide.

Miranda admitted to the sergeant at arms that he had read Democratic memos that a Republican staffer on the Judiciary Committee accessed through a glitch on the panel server. But it is unclear what rules if any Miranda broke. His defenders say that the files were openly available to Republicans through their desktop computers and that there is no such thing as a property right to a federal document.

Sergeant at Arms Bill Pickle’s investigation of how internal Democratic memos were leaked to the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times has halted the momentum Republicans built last year on judicial nominees. It has also generated bad publicity for Republicans.

Frist’s staff told The Boston Globe two weeks ago that Miranda had been placed on paid leave pending the results of the investigation. But Miranda’s fate may have been sealed by Pickle, who urged Frist chief of staff Lee Rawls to sack him, according to several Senate aides.

Miranda confronted Pickle in an e-mail last week.

“Do you think that it is appropriate to go to the GOP bicameral [retreat] today and lobby Frist staff and senators to have me fired, as I am told you have been doing? Do you think that will at all taint the report which you are soon to issue? Do you think it is proper?” Miranda demanded of the sergeant at arms.

Frist spokesman Bob Stevenson said no staff in the Majority Leader’s office reported being lobbied by Pickle.

“I have no idea what he’s referring to,” said Stevenson in response to the allegation.

Democrats had threatened Hatch Monday to hold up the proceedings of the Judiciary Committee unless he agreed to schedule a briefing by Pickle for Republicans and Democrats on the the investigation’s progress.

Pickle will reportedly participate in a senators-only briefing next Tuesday. His office’s investigation, which has interviewed over 100 staffers and seized several computers, is expected to conclude soon.

Some GOP senators resent the way the controversy turned from Democratic to Republican impropriety.

“Right now I think that was pretty unfair,” Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) said of the probe’s focus on Miranda. “I don’t have the impression he did anything wrong and we just completely quit looking at was done and what was found [in the memos]. I don’t know the details, but I would not be a friend in firing a highly qualified staffer.”

“Miranda has really been the quarterback on the Republican side for much of the Senate activity on this,” said Sean Rushton, the executive director of the Committee for Justice.

Republicans are also losing senior counsel Rena Comisac, who headed the Judiciary Committee’s nominations team. She will start working at the Justice Department next Monday.

Responsibility for judicial nominees in the majority leader’s office will now be assigned to Bill Wichterman, Frist’s director of coalitions.

But some conservatives are worried that Wichterman, who handles a wide array of issues and coalitions, will not be able to devote the same specialized attention as Miranda did to judicial nominees.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: bolton; estradamemo; frist; hatchchickens; ineffective; judiciarycommittee; manuelmiranda; memogate; miranda; naacpmemo; weak; whistleblower; wimps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: hchutch
Add in the media double standard, and his departure is mandated.

Why are you so willing to accept the "double standard" without
a fight....you MUST be a republican?! :)
Seriously, though, we really should not be accepting the
"old" media double standard..... we now have the internet, talk radio
and FoxNews to combat that BS.
IMHO, "double standard" is an unacceptable excuse for the GOP's
pathetic performance as the majority party.
101 posted on 02/05/2004 2:16:05 PM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
But how many people watch Fox News vs. ABC, CBS, and NBC's BROADCAST news programs? How many newspapers do they have vs. the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, and the New York Post?

Yeah, we have talk radio and the internet, but they have the edge, particularly how the broadcast networks spin things for them. If Fox had a broadcast news outlet similar to the ones that put Jennings, Brokaw, and Rather out there every weeknight, you might have a point. Given how the 24-hour news network has done, it would probably be rated #1 if it was fair and balanced.

The problem is, Brit Hume is NOT up against Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw. And most people tune in to Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw for their nightly news, NOT Fox News Channel. As such, they get the biased spin and the Republicans are held to a double standard that has to be dealt with.

It stinks, it's not fair, but it's how things are. And complaining won't change it.
102 posted on 02/05/2004 2:25:23 PM PST by hchutch ("I never get involved with my own life. It's too much trouble." - Michael Garibaldi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: diotima
I am so greatful to God that these folks who are dripping with holier-than-thou sanctimony were not in charge of the OSS during WWII.

These people clearly know nothing of the situation and make me physically ill. Anytime they'd like to get their sideline butts on the front line then I'll be happy to discuss this or any other situation about the nominations fight with them. Until then, they can push the button on the remote control, pop some popcorn and shut the hell up.
103 posted on 02/05/2004 8:32:35 PM PST by conservativegadfly1 (Mother Theresa: [America,] "If you don't want your babies, give them to me and I will take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
United States Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 119, also known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.

Is that the one McDermott violated when he accepted those tapes of Newt Gingrich's conference calls?

104 posted on 02/05/2004 8:45:05 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Good point.
105 posted on 02/05/2004 8:52:33 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Is that the one McDermott violated when he accepted those tapes of Newt Gingrich's conference calls?

Yes.

Sorry, I don't give "friends" a break.

106 posted on 02/05/2004 8:56:40 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
No, because my minor children are under my parental guardianship. The computer logs are not "theirs" in that sense.

On the other hand, that computer network isn't the republicans' nor the democrats.' It's ours, it belongs to the people of the US. Its use was granted to them by the people for the purposes of conducting the honest business of the United States, for judicial oversight, etc, not for conducting strategy sessions to thwart the opposite party politically, plan campaigns or what not.

So I'm naive. Hang em all for abuse of privilege.

107 posted on 02/05/2004 8:57:55 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I wouldn't ask you to, LOL, I was just wondering if that was the one.
108 posted on 02/05/2004 9:02:18 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
The republicans surrender faster that the french do.

With fighters such as frist, "We can't indict a sitting first lady" hatch, and trent lott, the '04 Presidental election is going to be a walk in the park.
109 posted on 02/05/2004 9:03:16 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Leaking the info to the papers instead of directing his discovery to his boss- is a definite clue to his ethical standards. In that respect, he reminds me of the former ambassador Wilson and his tea-drinking noninvestigation of the Niger yellowcake thing.

What if a DOD employee did that and essentially told the whole world we have a big gaping hole in our networks? (Without informing those responsible for fixing it?)

It isn't a wise thing to reveal your country's weakness to the universe without fixing the problem- even if that weakness is that of your political opponents.

110 posted on 02/05/2004 9:11:20 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I think Miranda knew Frist and Hatch wouldn't act on the info, and felt his only recourse was leaks to the media.
111 posted on 02/06/2004 4:23:43 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson