Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nov 3, 2000 NY TIMES ARTICLE Bush's Guard Attendance Is Questioned and Defended
NY TIMES via Free Republic ^ | November 3, 2000 | Jo Thomas

Posted on 02/03/2004 6:39:24 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded

Bush's Guard Attendance Is Questioned and Defended

Politics/Elections Front Page News Source: New York Times Published: 11/03/00 Author: JO THOMAS Posted on 11/02/2000 22:24:51 PST by kattracks

Two Democratic senators today called on Gov. George W. Bush to release his full military record to resolve doubts raised by a newspaper about whether he reported for required drills when he was in the Air National Guard in 1972 and 1973.

But a review of records by The New York Times indicated that some of those concerns may be unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question.

Dan Bartlett, a Bush spokesman, said that Mr. Bush had fulfilled his military obligations "or he would not have been honorably discharged."

The senators, Daniel K. Inouye of Hawaii and Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, both Medal of Honor winners, were responding, in a telephone conference with reporters, to an article in The Boston Globe on Tuesday.

The article, citing military records for Mr. Bush, raised questions about whether Mr. Bush performed any duty from April 1972 until September 1973, when he entered Harvard Business School.

A review by The Times showed that after a seven-month gap, he appeared for duty in late November 1972 at least through July 1973.

Mr. Bush was assigned to the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron at Ellington Air Force Base near Houston, from January 1970, last flying there on April 16, 1972.

In a report dated May 26, 1972, his commander, Maj. William D. Harris Jr., said Mr. Bush had "recently accepted the position as campaign manager for a candidate for the United States Senate."

Mr. Bush went to work for Winton M. Blount a few days after Mr. Blount won the Republican primary in Alabama on May 2, 1972.

From that time until after the election that November, Mr. Bush did not appear for duty, even after being told to report for training with an Alabama unit in October and November.

Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush had been too busy with the campaign to report in those months but made up the time later.

On Sept. 5, 1972, Mr. Bush asked his Texas Air National Guard superiors for assignment to the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery "for the months of September, October and November."

Capt. Kenneth K. Lott, chief of the personnel branch of the 187th Tactical Recon Group, told the Texas commanders that training in September had already occurred, but more training was scheduled for Oct. 7 and 8 and Nov. 4 and 5. But Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush did not serve on those dates because he was involved in the Senate campaign, but he made up those dates later.

Colonel Turnipseed, who retired as a general, said in an interview that regulations allowed Guard members to miss duty as long as it was made up within the same quarter.

Mr. Bartlett pointed to a document in Mr. Bush's military records that showed credit for four days of duty ending Nov. 29 and for eight days ending Dec. 14, 1972, and, after he moved back to Houston, on dates in January, April and May.

The May dates correlated with orders sent to Mr. Bush at his Houston apartment on April 23, 1973, in which Sgt. Billy B. Lamar told Mr. Bush to report for active duty on May 1-3 and May 8-10.

Another document showed that Mr. Bush served at various times from May 29, 1973, through July 30, 1973, a period of time questioned by The Globe.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 197273; 2004; awol; bush; bushrecord; deserter; nationalguard; nytimes
Bush served honorably, no questions about his service during height of Vietnam War 1966-1971, Left in May 1972 to work on Blount's campaign in Alabama and returned to Texas in Nov 1972 where he served honorably until discharge in July 73.

He only has May 72 to Nov 1972 that is even questionable.

The Dems are going around acting like he was AWOL for 1 1/2 years and noone saw him. But of course they had no problem supporting a draft dodger protesting his country for President that ran against 2 war heros.

1 posted on 02/03/2004 6:39:27 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
The White House should release as many pictures as they can of the President,as a young man in uniform.It will contrast nicely to the Botox Gigolo,spitting on soldiers and heaving his ribbons over the White House fence.The Marlboro Man vs The Maybelline man.
2 posted on 02/03/2004 6:51:17 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
I agree, if they aren't man enough to start standing up to the DemRats now even though they are calling him a deserter and AWOL, what will it take for him to fight back.
3 posted on 02/03/2004 7:00:11 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
"..if they aren't man enough to start standing up to the DemRats now .."

I think President Bush is a gentleman and very humble,but,I agree with you-the time has come, to take off the gloves.
4 posted on 02/03/2004 7:20:50 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Hmmm, early November? And Bush was a candidate for how long before the 2000 election for them to decide to "raise" this issue? ....

N Y TIMES timing on raising really old candidate background issues right before election questioned!


5 posted on 02/03/2004 7:46:17 PM PST by WOSG (Support Tancredo on immigration. Support BUSH for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
For you file.
6 posted on 02/03/2004 7:46:58 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

7 posted on 02/03/2004 7:49:54 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Anything in the New York Slimes deserves a barf alert.
8 posted on 02/03/2004 7:52:33 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
The truth is, in 1971 while Bush was wearing his uniform with pride and serving his country, and supporting the troops, Kerry was desacrating the uniform, desicrating the flag, and not supporting the troops.
9 posted on 02/03/2004 7:54:41 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
The truth is, in 1971 while Bush was wearing his uniform with pride and serving his country, and supporting the troops, Kerry was desacrating the uniform, desicrating the flag, and not supporting the troops.


KerryNotASoldier_1.jpg
KerryNotASoldier_2.jpg(61K)
KerryNotASoldier_3.jpg(60K)
KerryNotASoldier_4.jpg(60K)
KerryNotASoldier_4.jpg(59K)

In 1971 George W. Bush was wearing uniform with pride and serving his country. In 1971 Kerry was desecrating our flag, calling our troops baby killers, and openly siding with our enemy.

10 posted on 02/03/2004 7:55:18 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Can the party of Hanoi Jane ever be taken seriously?
11 posted on 02/03/2004 8:05:30 PM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded; Howlin
Greatly appreciated- I've been looking high & low for this article-- cross-linking to:

-The Real Military Record of George W. Bush: Not Heroic, but Not AWOL, Either-The Original Story--

12 posted on 02/04/2004 2:50:45 AM PST by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)... the 00's? The Decade of Lunatics...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson