Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement regarding the Super Bowl halftime show
www.superbowl.com ^ | February 1, 2004 | NFL

Posted on 02/01/2004 7:20:07 PM PST by Lawgvr1955

Statement by NFL Executive Vice President Joe Browne regarding the Super Bowl halftime show:

"We were extremely disappointed by elements of the MTV-produced Halftime show. They were totally inconsistent with assurances our office was given about the show. It's unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: boycott; boycottviacom; cbs; culturewar; denialaintariver; divaofdeviance; football; hedonists; hollywood; hollywoodvalues; immorality; indecentexposure; jackson; janetjackson; liars; libertines; lyingliars; mtv; mtvculture; mtvofforbymongrels; nfl; nick; nipplegate; noshame; permissivesociety; popculture; porn; promiscuity; seebs; sexualdeviance; sexualperversion; spike; stripshow; superbowl; trash; turass; tvland; vh1; viacom; viacommie; viacomradio; waterballoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-468 next last
To: breakem
Super Bowl XXXVIII D.
161 posted on 02/01/2004 8:13:25 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (The halftime show was a bust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
And your point is???

That's my point. What is the difference between a female breast and a male breast? None.

None.

If anything, I would always prefer to look at a naked female chest than a male one and it is perfectly acceptable to show the male one.

162 posted on 02/01/2004 8:13:46 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Trolling, trolling, trolling...
163 posted on 02/01/2004 8:13:48 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: smith288
The boob tonight was really no different than what you see on commercials these days, in fact, seeing it with no covering is less titillating than when it is only slightly covered, which makes you wish you could see the whole thing. Here, there was not that longing - it was just there, and we can move on, not wondering what it looked like.
164 posted on 02/01/2004 8:14:20 PM PST by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
What's the outrage here?

Only sissies get "outraged."

The problem is that (a) you didn't see the show and (b) Janet Jackson's display was merely the culmination of 20+ minutes of soft porn for a family audience, and also a global audience.

It ain't about boobs, except for you.

165 posted on 02/01/2004 8:14:38 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Oh, don't get me wrong. Breasts are evil. Really evil. I don't know how I will ever recover now that I have seen Janet's mostly exposed breast. I'm traumatized... I can think of nothing worse than seeing a bare female breast.

I can think of something worse... trying to explain to my daughters (both under 10 years of age) why the man they just witnessed forcibly removing a woman's clothing exposing her breast on national TV, is not arrested on the spot.

The show had no parental advisory and they had no right to subject my family to this nonsense.

166 posted on 02/01/2004 8:14:49 PM PST by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Breasts are not evil, but a woman who bares her breasts on national television, a network that permits that, a football league who hires it to be done, and the general proposition that there are no moral standards, and that whatever some juvenile entertainment mentality decides should be foisted upon us over the airways against our wills, evil or not, can be confronted as if it were evil, as it may be. The people who did this to the those of us who did not expect it, did want it and did not need it, at least some of these degenerate perps, are going to pay with their jobs or profits, I hope, and well they should. Evil or not, most of us did not like seeing some elderly woman's boob displayed during the intermission of a sporting event, and payback time is coming and coming soon, I hope.Damn the ACLU and all those responsible for turning our culture into crap. This ought to be a campaign issue, and let's here some of the candidates hum their hums about who good it is that we can be mortified by the media time and again.
167 posted on 02/01/2004 8:14:55 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
We don't even have kids here, Sam, and we were blindedsided, too.

Sounds like you're raised a very centered child!
168 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:03 PM PST by Howlin (If we don't post, will they exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jungleboy
woops... abc=dnc also
169 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:03 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955
To Joe Browne, you NFL jerk!

WE watched the titalating scene on my 450" B+W!

I had 25,000 friends over for a weenie roast.

We saw it on your broadcast.

We are all hiring attorneys tomorrow.........and other attorneys!:)

170 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:07 PM PST by RIGHT IN LAS VEGAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Re: It was the manner in which it was exposed.

Agreed. It has all the smackings of an assault.

171 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:20 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
It was the manner in which it was exposed.

What would your rather see? Janet expose her breast or a lesbian kiss? Personally, the breast exposure by Janet pales in comparison to the degradation of values that accompaniest the lesbian kiss by Madonna/B.Spears.

172 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:42 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
"Super Bowl XXXVIII D" THAT IS HILARIOUS!!!!
173 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:54 PM PST by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
inDeed!
174 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:58 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
LOL. You need to get over youself buddy. What did you eat as a baby? You didn't come out of the womb eating Kraft Macaroni and Cheese.

So much disdain for God and your fellow man? That's real emptiness. I am truly sorry.

175 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:00 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
up and down
176 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:10 PM PST by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Super Bowl XXXVIII

Next year, Super Bowl XXXIX XXX.

177 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:15 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: mathurine
Breasts are not evil

End of story.

178 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:27 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Julliardsux
Here, there was not that longing - it was just there, and we can move on, not wondering what it looked like.

Gosh, I don't think many of us were sitting there wondering, gee, why doesn't Justin Timberlake take off Janet Jackson's top? I had my channel on CBS to watch a football game. As for the rest of your argument, like I said earlier, it's also natural to defecate, but I don't want to see Janet do that on tv either.

179 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:32 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
I think not. I REALLY don't want to see her breast
180 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:34 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-468 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson