Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Julliardsux
Here, there was not that longing - it was just there, and we can move on, not wondering what it looked like.

Gosh, I don't think many of us were sitting there wondering, gee, why doesn't Justin Timberlake take off Janet Jackson's top? I had my channel on CBS to watch a football game. As for the rest of your argument, like I said earlier, it's also natural to defecate, but I don't want to see Janet do that on tv either.

179 posted on 02/01/2004 8:16:32 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: NYCVirago
I was.

Anyway, about the defecation - as TV stands now, since we can see skimpy bikinis, but not the naked boob, that is analogous to being able to see a shot of someone's shorts turning brown and lumpy, but not actually being shown the defecation - it's a distinction w/o a difference.

I think to argue that a boob should not be shown (assuming not in the context of a sexual act), one must also argue that bikinies and bras, as allowed to be seen now, also should not be shown.
190 posted on 02/01/2004 8:19:21 PM PST by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson