Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gilligan quits BBC over Kelly row
BBC ^ | January 30, 2004

Posted on 01/30/2004 11:44:47 AM PST by HAL9000

BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan has resigned in the wake of the criticism directed at him in the Hutton report.

Mr Gilligan conceded some of his story was wrong, and apologised for it.

He said his departure was at his own initiative, but described the BBC collectively as the victim of a "grave injustice".

Earlier departing BBC director general Greg Dyke said he was shocked by the findings of the Hutton Inquiry and did not accept all of the report.

He said Lord Hutton had "given the benefit of doubt to every government witness and not to any at the BBC".

Mark Byford, the acting director general, said the corporation recognised that it had made errors.

He said his duty was to bring "calmness, clarity, leadership" to the organisation.

"It has been a very, very difficult week - that's an under-statement," Mr Byford told BBC Radio 4's PM programme.

"I would say the BBC at the top ... has shown it recognises that it's been an extremely turbulent week.

"It recognises that it has lost - quite extraordinary for any organisation - both its chairman and chief executive, but ... it must move forward ... there have been mistakes, it's a learning organisation ... and will be stronger from it."

Mr Byford is leading an internal inquiry into what went wrong and the steps needed to ensure it does not happen again.

'Grave concern'

He said the BBC had "a duty of care" to all its employees, including the Today defence correspondent Mr Gilligan, whose report was at the centre of the David Kelly controversy.

He added: "There will be a due process to consider the implications of the staff involved. I will lead that process."

Earlier, Mr Dyke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme it was perfectly fair for people to "draw the conclusion that I don't accept all of the report".

"Our legal team were all very surprised by the nature of the report."

Mr Dyke suggested the implications for journalism coming from the report were a matter of grave concern for the media.

"Lord Hutton does seem to suggest that it is not enough for a broadcaster or a newspaper... to simply report what a whistleblower says because they are an authoritative source. You have to demonstrate that it is true. That would change the law in this country."

He said he had had to offer his resignation after the report but had not wanted to go.

Under pressure

Speaking outside his home in Twickenham, south west London, he said: "The governors were in an incredibly difficult position. Hutton was very critical of the BBC - so critical that the chairman had decided to resign and I too felt I had to resign.

"They decided I did not have their full support."

Ex-culture secretary Chris Smith said there had been no need for heads to roll at the BBC and called for next Wednesday's Commons debate on the Hutton report to examine the issues surrounding the Iraq war.

Tony Blair is under pressure to make a statement on the intelligence he presented to Parliament on Iraq's weapons after the US national security chief admitted for the first time there may have been flaws in the gathering of material about the Iraqi arsenal.

Downing Street says it will wait and see whether the Iraq Survey Group turns up evidence of weapons of mass destruction.

'Matter should rest'

The prime minister's official spokesman said Lord Hutton's report had been fair. "A dispassionate judge has looked at the facts and has made his judgment on the facts. That's where the matter should rest.

"We accept there was a lot of emotion and a lot of anger yesterday but the judge has reached his conclusions on his assessment of the facts and what people should recognise is that this is the judge's verdict."

THE HUTTON REPORT

BBC director of news Richard Sambrook has sent an email to all staff saying he will be working with Mr Byford, senior editors and news managers to look at ways to rebuild trust in the corporation.

Meanwhile ministers have stressed the importance of a BBC independent of government influence in the wake of Lord Hutton's criticisms of the corporation.

Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell said: "A BBC that is nobody's lapdog, that challenges government and raises debate - that is in all our interests."



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: andrewgilligan; bb; bbc; davidkelly; gilligan; iraq; kelly; resignation; sexedup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: HAL9000
Okay, one of my wishes has not been fulfilled.

The other wish was that the BBC lose its Government financing and has to compete in the real dog-eat-dog world of journalism. With their contract up for renewal soon, they are going to be making major changes and concessions to survive.

I hope they don't survive at all. If they do, then the BBC governors themselves need to be governed by another agency to stop their control of people's minds in Britain and elsewhere in Europe.

Time to stop their anti-Blair, anti-Bush, and anti-American rhetoric.

21 posted on 01/30/2004 12:01:07 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
The New York Times'll hire him.. If it can beat the L.A. Times and many other like-minded papers... I'll bet he's already lined up a job with Al Jazeera!
22 posted on 01/30/2004 12:01:26 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
has not been fulfilled -> has NOW been fulfilled
23 posted on 01/30/2004 12:01:33 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
They didn't hire the Professor. Fools.

24 posted on 01/30/2004 12:03:04 PM PST by HolgerDansk (Vikings: The Original Amphibious Warriors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
I know there's a vacancy over at AJ. The Beeb just hired some al Jazeera guy.
25 posted on 01/30/2004 12:03:14 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
He said Lord Hutton had "given the benefit of doubt to every government witness and not to any at the BBC".

Sounds like a sound strategy to me.

26 posted on 01/30/2004 12:04:45 PM PST by Sloth (Why bother with fighting foreign enemies if we surrender to the domestic ones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
The BBC is ripe for an old-fashioned Soviet-style purge of the radical leftists who have overrun the joint, and have turned it into a mouthpiece for elitist crackpots.
27 posted on 01/30/2004 12:09:11 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
So what are British taxpayers waiting for? :)
28 posted on 01/30/2004 12:10:07 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
NPR's coverage (this morning) of the BBC situation emphasized the fact that Gilligan's report was aired "only once at 6:45 in the morning" and that only one aspect of the report (that Iraq's chemical weapons could be made ready for use in combat within 45 minutes) was disputed.

No mention of the fact that the accusation that this information represented a falsehood was incendiary, and would probably have resulted in the fall of the Blair government if it had turned out to be true.

(steely)

29 posted on 01/30/2004 12:11:35 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
A lot of them buy into the whitewash theory. They need new tinfoil hats too.
30 posted on 01/30/2004 12:12:12 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Well, I guess that's what is called an even trade.

Now, if only the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) would have a meltdown. The CBC is as bad, if not worse, than the BBC when it comes to leftist hogwash...
31 posted on 01/30/2004 12:12:21 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Jeepers creepers, do they really? Sheesh.
32 posted on 01/30/2004 12:13:26 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Hey, don't put PBS down. I like NOVA. And I did watch Monty Python and the Goodies on KUHT (Houston) as a kid. And, well, that's about it.

Oh, and I have a Jack Russell Terrier that comes to a complete screeching halt to watch Teletubbies.

Æ
33 posted on 01/30/2004 12:13:43 PM PST by AgentEcho (If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
Is the CBC private or public, happen to recall?
34 posted on 01/30/2004 12:14:07 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Mr Gilligan conceded some of his story was wrong, and apologised for it.

Oh, that's mighty big of him. In the not-too-distant past, that was all it took to be forgiven for being a lying lowlife degenerate media whore who fabricates the news instead of just reporting it.

35 posted on 01/30/2004 12:15:17 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (If universities didn't teach worthless subjects, who would?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Mr Dyke suggested the implications for journalism coming from the report were a matter of grave concern for the media. "Lord Hutton does seem to suggest that it is not enough for a broadcaster or a newspaper... to simply report what a whistleblower says because they are an authoritative source. You have to demonstrate that it is true. That would change the law in this country."

Does anyone else find this statement rather bizarre? Don't they have editors and fact-checkers across the pond?

36 posted on 01/30/2004 12:16:55 PM PST by Warren_Piece (Wake up you Sheeple! The Steelers fan invaders are a bunch of Statists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
...but described the BBC collectively as the victim of a "grave injustice".

He said that because he is now in the market for another job at a different media outlet. He either has to kiss up to the liberal media establishment or go find another career where he has to (Gulp!!) hobnob with the horrible uncultured common man.

37 posted on 01/30/2004 12:18:07 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (If universities didn't teach worthless subjects, who would?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I was just thinking that he is the only real person I have ever heard of named Gilligan.

I did once know a girl named milligan tho.

38 posted on 01/30/2004 12:18:41 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
The same people responsible for Gilligan are responsible for the editors and fact-checkers. The fish stinks from the head down.
39 posted on 01/30/2004 12:20:08 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
NPR's coverage (this morning) of the BBC situation emphasized the fact that Gilligan's report was aired "only once at 6:45 in the morning" and that only one aspect of the report (that Iraq's chemical weapons could be made ready for use in combat within 45 minutes) was disputed. No mention of the fact that the accusation that this information represented a falsehood was incendiary, and would probably have resulted in the fall of the Blair government if it had turned out to be true.

I bet NPR didn't mention that the report was picked up by every commie organization in the world and repeated over and over again.

40 posted on 01/30/2004 12:22:12 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson