Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
Your take on that Medicare thing of my mom's about a year or so ago was pretty damned wise. Based on your track record of wisdom, I'll seriously consider your thoughts and incorporate the ones that have merit.
Have faith, my friend, with faith all things are possible.
Yeah. I suppose you're right.
But JUST DAMN. Can't Dubya dance with the one who brung him a little more???
Goldwater was to the left of JFK.
You call it tantrum, I call it long term strategy. If refusing to get behind a guy who thinks there is a federal program for everything is a tantrum, I am thinking I may never grow up...
I certainly hope so. They *should've* done that when we got the White House & both chambers, but it didn't happen.
Okay, I'll concede that there is a qualitative difference. There are certain societal effects that go along with being hit in your homeland. The long-term effects of having a war on their territories stunned both Germany and Japan for at least 20-30 years. Of course, the conflagration that those two nations earned for themselves was much larger than the WTC.
Good post Jim and thank you
Is that what they taught you in public schools there in Texas? I guess it was because he was a feriner' and all, being from Arizona. I suppose you have never heard the "extremism in the defense of liberty" speech? I guess they'll also teach the kids that Dubya was to the right of JFK?
Let's be consistent here....... ;o)
Prepare to justify that comment. I'll see you tomorrow.
LOL!
funnyWfan.
And why only the WHITE farmers ? What about the blacks who don't support Mugabe?
Why not also fly, at our expense, the Afrikaners and the Zulus and the coloreds, of South Africa too. Oh and what about the Chinese, who want to have more than one baby, and the North Koreans, being starved to death by Kim Jung Ill and, and, and.....................
I'd much rather eat worms for breakfast, lunch and dinner, than surrender to the lefties.
I'm with you, sir.
God help us all if that man is ever elected President
No offense, but your argument wouldn't have convinced me. cyncooper's was much better.
That makes part of my point. Pearl Harbor was a military attack by military forces on a military base, in a territory across an ocean for most Americans, with military casualties - very few civilians involved.
The Trade Center was civilians, could have anybody, dying right downtown.
Major difference and a much larger effect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.