Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
Then how about apologizing to all of us who differ with you.
The "sheep" comment hurt, didn't it?
You're right about that -- it did hurt -- you. It made you look petty.
It wasn't meant as an insult;
We ALL believe that.
it was more of an adjective to describe the lack of objective discussion on this thread.
I take that to mean that you can't find anybody on here who agrees with you so you've just decided to characterize all the discussion going on around you as "not objective."
BTW,
This is #1 for me. As long as GW continues to appoint conservative judges, and fight for them to make it through congress, he will have my vote. Not that I'm happy with some of his policies, but the thought of the RATS back in power especially after 9/11 is too terrifying a thought for me.
Not really. Right now all the Bush supporters are using national security as the boogie-man to keep disgruntled supporters in line. The prez and his cabinet may make policy with regards to the direction, but you are still counting on the same civil servants to keep watch no matter who is running that administration. I just think the WOT thing has been pushed a little too much as a reelection reason because Dubya supporters have little else to fall back on.
That takes the cake. I could have done without 8 years of Clinton very easily and so could have a lot of people. You must have voted for him or Perot with an attitude like that. How anyone can say Clinton was good for anyone is beyond me. We can thank Clinton and his irresponsibility for 9/11 if you ask me because he devasted the CIA and our Military. And you have the nerve to say he was good. Give this person a break!
They sure do. And I think most conservatives have learned to beware of siren songs, pied pipers, and jug-eared generals. Go Greenies!!
My point is you are likely to have the same result be it a Kerry nominee or a Dubya nominee. Dubya could try to play hard-ball, but personally I don't think he has it in him to do what it takes to get another Rehnquist or Thomas on the SCOTUS.
Then he believes in these massive increases in federal giveaway spending.
Then he believes in the unconstitutional suppression of the First Amendment in the form of CFR.
Then he believes in huge gun bans in the form of a permanent renewel of the AW ban.
Frankly, that scares me worse. I prefer to hold on to the fantasy that maybe he doesn't believe in all this liberal claptrap.
Please let me cling to that fantasy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.