Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
Sitting out the election, and not exercising your right to vote is, IMO, being a lousy American.
Is that kind of vitriol really necessary? We're having a nice discussion here; people of differing opinions are being reasonably respectful. Then you come along with comments like these and incite a flamefest.
Perhaps you'd consider dialing the rhetoric back a notch? Thanks in advance.
That wouldn't stop them. They would just call on one of their appointed judges to legislate from the BENCH!
As a result, we're going to see more conservative opposition to Bush expressed here at this forum than is representative of the nation.
There's nothing we can do or should do about that. Conservatives do not have to be Republicans.
However, if they want to prevent Democrats from running this country, they do have to support and vote for Republicans in state and national elections.
If not, they are wasting their vote, no matter how hard they whine that they're not.
No third party will ever win a national election until they've been successful consistently at the local or state level.
A victory for Bush is critical to the future of this country. Supreme Court justices serve for 30 years or more, and we're facing a bunch of upcoming vacancies.
This should be a no-brainer for any conservative. Perhaps it is. Perhaps the whiners post one way and vote another. I hope so.
As I see your point about the 60 senators, I guess the only explanation I can give is that our side doesn't play dirty tricks like the Dems do.
Our side doesn't use and abuse our national security secrets to score political points like the Dems as we found out in the leaked Select Intell Memo
Our side doesn't abuse the justice systems like the Dems do as we found out in the leaked JC Memo
Are you saying we should throw our principals out the window and fight dirty like the Democrats do?
And WHAT would you call YOUR post to me, other than a personal attack,baiting, an invitation to a flame war,and a senseless diatribe ? :-)
If it was any other FReeper besides Jim Robinson who created this Vanity thread my "sheep" comment would be a non-issue.
Efforts don't pass SCOTUS decisions. Based upon his inability to force through a latino conservative (by press accounts) to a federal appellate position, what makes you think he will provide us with the next Rehnquist to the SC? I have plenty of evidence the guy will cave to the Dems to get "something" passed. Remember the edumacation bill that was going to have school choice as a center piece? No school choice, but plenty of money for the DOE to toss around and penned by Kennedy no less! What are you guys going to do when he puts forth a middle of the road, swing vote to the Supreme Court? Claim it was the fact that he did not have 60 Rep senators to back him up?
You are right to ask me that question. I am, in fact, wrong. It's going up 33%.
Bush Is Said to Seek More Money for Arts [$15 million to $20 million for NEA]
do you know what the increase is going to fund?
I couldn't begin to care. The federal government does not belong in spending on the arts.
I find it hilarious that you, claiming great principles, feel the need to demean those of us who have different opinions than yours as sheep.
And since you're insisting that something is wrong with us unless we agree with YOU, what the HELL does that make you, other than a lockstepper?
It neither supports nor invalidates the arguments he's made. Quite frankly, it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever. Hence the reason I asked whether his comments are any more or less valid based on his citizenship (the answer is no, just like you and I can hold strong opinions about the French while sitting here in the Good Ole US of A).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.