VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!

Free Republic

[Jim Robinson]

Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.

Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.

Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.

Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.

Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.

Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.

Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.

Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.

Say no to the RATS!!

[WOSG]

We are close to getting that spending-restraint agenda in place:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1069034/posts?page=12#12

Let me repeat what I've said in another thread.

The path is clear for conservatives, and quite simple:
1. Make the Republican Party the majority party in America.
2. Make the Republican Party a principled, conservative party.

Note that both #1 and #2 are needed. Each by itself is not enough.

We are wasting energy if we do things that hurt this path to saving America.

[Jim Robinson]

Doing anything at all that strengthens the Democrat (ie, Marxist) hold on power is sending the WRONG message. Examples of strengthing the Marxist hold on power would be voting directly for or supporting any Democrat in any office thereby helping to give them (the Marxists) the majority control in any executive, legislative, or judicial body whether it be federal, state or local. Other examples would be working against the candidates of the only party that has the strength to defeat Marxism in our land, ie, the Republican Party. Another example would be not voting.

[xsmommy]

that seems so self evident. it is disheartening that so many can't seem to grasp it. thanks for posting this. it needed to be done, and as someone else said, probably should be done at least once a week.

[Jim Robinson]

Irrelevant.

[George W. Bush]

1. Make the Republican Party the majority party in America.
2. Make the Republican Party a principled, conservative party.

I think #2 is more important than #1. By far.

However, if we can have both #1 and #2, I'm all for it. But if we're going to get only one, I choose #2.

Having a majority party that is a vehicle for liberal big-government RINOs is not in the interest of conservatives and they shouldn't vote for it, expecting that it will magically transform into something else at a later date. It never happens. We gave them the House. They said we need the Senate. We gave them the Senate. Then they said we needed the White House. We gave them the White House. Now they say they need sixty votes in the Senate. All this while spending more and more and more!

At some point, they have to deliver and not just make another excuse to us while spending like drunken Democrats and racing to beat the Dims to create some vast new entitlement program like the Pill Bill or expand the funding of the godless NEA or Department of Education or Department of Labor or finding fresh minority groups to pander to but who will never vote for us anyway.

Better minority party status than to utterly abandon our conservative and constitutional principles. And this budget has broken the camel's back. We're fully awake now and they're going to wish they hadn't tried to pull this one over on us.

[Mudboy Slim]

"...me and Mudboy aren't those kind of girls."

LOL...actually, my wife'll tell ya I'm sorta easy...MUD

[k2blader]

It's not that we can't grasp that some would rather have President Bush beat the Democrat candidate this November.

It's that President Bush's support for certain ideas has rendered him less than trustworthy in the eyes of folks looking for consistent advancement of conservatism in our government.

And there's no need to drag out the lists again. All of us closely following politics know the good things and the not-so-good things he's pushed for. Of course there's no such thing as a perfect President.

The conservatives who think they are being taken for granted by the current administration have a credible complaint. To them a vote is a trust. And as the trust has been broken by the other party, why should they so easily grant their vote again?

[Mudboy Slim]

"To assure that Congress observes spending discipline, now and in the future, I propose making spending limits the law. This simple step would mean that every additional dollar the Congress wants to spend in excess of spending limits must be matched by a dollar in spending cuts elsewhere. Budget limits must mean something, and not just serve as vague guidelines to be routinely violated. This single change in the procedures of the Congress would bring further spending restraint to Washington." -President Bush, 1/30/04

Will THIS git picked up by the Sunday shows?! How 'bout by Rush?! This is the sorta over-arching spending restraint that needs to be at the forefront of the upcoming campaign, imho!! This would force Congress to make decisions as to priorities in Federal spending. My priority is defending this country from enemies here and abroad, and I think we could make the case that this priority takes precedence over payin' folks fer sittin' on their arses!!

Thanks fer the link...maybe Dubyuh's finally coming to the realization that outta-control spending is not acceptable to those of us who want him to serve a second term!!

FReegards...MUD

[VRWC For Truth]

Bump to defeat the enemy of a Free Republic, the 'Rats, first. 'Rats = Saddam, GOP = Kadaffi. Kadaffi folded his cards once he saw the writing on the wall.

[farmfriend]

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

He is sliding it in the back door.

[Mudboy Slim]

"Doing anything at all that strengthens the Democrat (ie, Marxist) hold on power is sending the WRONG message."

Agreed.

"Examples of strengthing the Marxist hold on power would be voting directly for or supporting any Democrat in any office thereby helping to give them (the Marxists) the majority control in any executive, legislative, or judicial body whether it be federal, state or local."

Never done it...never will.

"Other examples would be working against the candidates of the only party that has the strength to defeat Marxism in our land, ie, the Republican Party."

With all due respect, I believe it is important that we on the Right realize that having an "(R)" behind their name is no defense for abandoning the constitutional principles that make this Country the greatest in the history of the World. RINOs have done incalculable damage to our Party, and the ones who are indistinguishable from DemonRATS need to be challenged whenever possible. Heck, as a Virginian, I'm as embarrassed as can be by our RINO Senator, Gentleman Jawn Wahnah, and I cast a write-in vote fer Ollie North in 2000 and remain proud that I didn't serve as a enabler to a Republican Senator whom I detest.

"Another example would be not voting."

I ALWAYS vote...to do otherwise deprives me, IMHO, of the right to bi+c#...LOL!!

FReegards...MUD

[hchutch]

I'll take the limit to 1% growth for now... work on the rest of it later.

It's a big enough cut to make some difference, but the Dems can't call it a cut.

[Mudboy Slim]

Where were y'all?...this post shouldda been yers...MUD

[Jim Robinson]

My whole purpose for starting Free Republic in the first place was because I was fed up with the left. I was and am totally disgusted and outraged at the communist/marxist/socialist/liberal takeover of America.

I was fed up with their tyranny and corruption and their relentless march on destroying our society and our freedoms. Their continued and wanton destruction of morality and our religious freedom. Their misuse of the military. Their abandonment of our national sovereignty to world bodies. Their constant erosion of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Their liberal activists judges legislating their evil will from the bench. Their brainwashing of our children. Their shoving homosexualism into our faces and down our children's throats in government schools. Their government sanctioned wholesale slaughter of innocent unborn children.

How much evil and tyranny should a free man be expected to stomach before he becomes enraged and decides to rebel against it?

Hey I was fed up and outraged at the Party of Darkness, Corruption and Evil (ie, the Democrat Party) with Clinton at the helm, and I'm still just as fed up and outraged today. I want not only to destroy their evil party, I want to drive a stake through its Marxist heart so it can never rise again!

This is my whole purpose for FR in a nutshell.

As far as I'm concerned. those who cannot live with this, or who do not believe that the elimination of marxism as a major political force from America is a good idea or who have some other agenda in mind might as well take it elsewhere. You are on the wrong forum.

[Jeff Gordon]

Nice.

[Mudboy Slim]

"I'll take the limit to 1% growth for now... work on the rest of it later."

It's definitely a move in the RIGHT direction...now we need to take direct aim at so-called "non-discretionary spending"!!

"It's a big enough cut to make some difference, but the Dems can't call it a cut."

Cut another 1% and we can call it a "freeze"...LOL, some of us RadicalRightWingers are insatiable, eh?!

FReegards...MUD

BTW...what did you think of Dubyuh's proposal quoted in post #1088?

[FBD]

"Say whatever else you like, FBD, but me and Mudboy aren't those kind of girls."

That's a heckova mental image I got- of you and Mud dressed in drag...{G}

Anyway, let's hope G.W. ain't that kinda guy!

Republican Lawmakers Won’t Back Bush on Immigration

[Jim Robinson]

Well, when push comes to shove (and it will) see my number 1094 on this thread.

[jwalsh07]

Everything Bush has done - conservative things and not-so-conservative things - have been consistent with his 2000 campaign and message.

Exactly so. I was aware that President Bush would do all those things he campaigned on prior to voting for him. He has been a man of his word.

I can understand those who disagree with his choices but I have no sympathy for those who claim they were betrayed. It's a joke, the man has been good to his word.

While I disagree with him on immigration, excessive non-defense spending, CFR and a poor medicaid bill, he's already got my donation and he'll get my vote.

He has been great on the WOT, great on tax reduction, strongly pro life and pro family and brought honesty and decency to an office that needed it desperately.

The though of John Kerry or Howard Dean occupying the White House at this critical time in US History, vis a vis jihadists, makes me physically ill.

[restornu]

So many have short attention span! So many are creatures of habits!

Bush said this 21st centurty War is different from all we ever fought!

I think we are failing in our PR!

Alwasy include/remind in talks and news that we are fighting a new kind of War.

WMD = Weapons of Mass Destruction!

A discription or a reminder should be incuded that these things can be a test tube or a size of a coffee thermos etc.

WMD really conjures up something gigantic!

I am sure there are many containers but are all in one spot or are they stored in small packages?


I like your BUSH list, and I think GWB will do what is possible to support good!

It is up to citizens to manke a differents in their communtiry be it eduction health or pro life etc.

We must get involved or the RATS will rule!