To: hchutch
"I'll take the limit to 1% growth for now... work on the rest of it later." It's definitely a move in the RIGHT direction...now we need to take direct aim at so-called "non-discretionary spending"!!
"It's a big enough cut to make some difference, but the Dems can't call it a cut."
Cut another 1% and we can call it a "freeze"...LOL, some of us RadicalRightWingers are insatiable, eh?!
FReegards...MUD
BTW...what did you think of Dubyuh's proposal quoted in post #1088?
1,096 posted on
01/31/2004 2:23:10 PM PST by
Mudboy Slim
(RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
To: Mudboy Slim
Looks okay, as long as defense spending is excluded.
I'd like another $75 billion for defense, please.
1,130 posted on
01/31/2004 3:19:04 PM PST by
hchutch
("I find this notion of the press .. a fascinating, sometimes troubling concept." Ambassador Delenn)
To: Mudboy Slim
As for non-discretionary... wait until the second term.
1,133 posted on
01/31/2004 3:22:22 PM PST by
hchutch
("I find this notion of the press .. a fascinating, sometimes troubling concept." Ambassador Delenn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson