1 posted on
01/28/2004 9:09:58 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
God Bless Rush Limbaugh
2 posted on
01/28/2004 9:15:55 PM PST by
ChadsDad
To: Pokey78
As usual, Tyrrell nails the truth and upholds conservative principles. Tyrrell has a book coming out soon (Feb) on that great fraud Hillary Clinton. I hope all Freepers will buy and read it. She may be the next un-Dean if Kerry cannot fool enough Democrats into letting him become the Dukakis of 2004.
3 posted on
01/28/2004 9:17:15 PM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
To: Pokey78
Bttt.
To: Pokey78; holdonnow
The silence is shameful.
11 posted on
01/28/2004 9:29:52 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
To: Pokey78
14 posted on
01/28/2004 9:32:31 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
To: Pokey78
The truth is, there are many statist liberals and conservatives who are addicted to the War on Drugs. Leave it to big government to take a serious social problem and make it worse.
Many liberals were initially skeptical of the War on Drugs, until they discovered the incredible power and takings possible -- corrupt officials can order hits on innocent people under cover of the WOD, and the property confiscating feature without due process is a socialist's dream. Besides, drug laws, like gun laws, were never meant for the Hollywood elites and leftist politicians.
Conservatives correctly deplore the damage caused by the amoral drug culture, but many are led to react to the problem in emotional terms -- just like the liberals. So when an enterprising socialist proposes a WOD measure that will further erode Fourth Amendment rights (after all, it is "only" property and "privacy" only matters to a liberal if it somehow involves abortion), the socialist only has to coo "if you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to fear" and this will whip many "conservatives" into line. Since some conservatives accept the same socialist premise of the liberals, they cannot complain even when a conservative is railroaded for political reasons.
When people are in reactive mode and/or have hidden agendas, the statists manipulate the system and win. If you suggest that the system is broken and corrupt, many liberals will say you don't care about post-abortion-age children, and many conservatives will call you a "druggie." To the statist, if you think there may be no perfect WOD solution, you are in favor of giving children cocaine, just like if you are against raising the minimum wage to $100 per hour you are in favor of making poor people starve.
22 posted on
01/28/2004 9:59:45 PM PST by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: Pokey78
They arent going to charge Rush, they are just going to attack him and try to slander him. It is doubtful that it will really hurt him though because most people either love him or hate him there isnt really any middle ground so to speak.This is really turning into a non-story except to point out that you cant trust police officers to do the right thing they are just as corrupt as the lawyers they work with!
23 posted on
01/28/2004 10:01:04 PM PST by
claptrap
To: Pokey78
Dear Pokey78,I am a FreePer and I heard about your GREAT POST while listening to El Rushbo(77/WABC)today!I am prouder than ever to be called a FreePer!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: CAtholic Family Association
You asked about the Democrat Reno's prior life of a SA:
She was a prosecutor in then Dade (now Miami-Dade to satisfy the ego of Democrat Alex Pinelas who was upset nobody knew Dade county. An insult to the late Col. Dade.)
During her tenure, scandles dominated the police department and jeopardized their cases. She left the office one big mess.
One should also keep in mind that prosecutors are not like TV prosecutors. Once a case is filed, prosecutor are very limited in their options. (if a DUI case is obviously flawed an should be dropped, the hapless prosecutor can do much. They can plea it for minimums or try it, to even consider dropping it requires extensive memos and the approval of supervisors. This is all circuits)
Many jobs are crony jobs. Since the prosecutor is an elected position, the Assitant SA jobs are dependant on the SA keeping his job. No matter how you slice it, it is a government job.
Don't even start on the near sleazy fundraising tactics of courthouse public service.
To: Pokey78
I like Rush and have been following him since the late '80's, but geez, lately it's been all Democrat, all day, everyday. While I'm thoroughly disgusted with Dubya's betrayal of conservatives, I know he's going to win in an electoral landslide. So, why does Rush waste so much air-time analyzing the dimwit Democrat candidates? Rush calls himself a conservative first, then a Republican, but why doesn't he spend more time trying to steer Bush in the right (conservative) direction instead of using his show to e deflect for Bush? Sheesh, if Republicans had passed all of the socialism for Clinton that they've agreed to with Bush, Rush would've had an aneurysm by now.
36 posted on
01/29/2004 4:53:28 AM PST by
Nephi
(Compassionate conservatism: Sure it's socialism, but what are you gonna do, vote for Nikita Dean?)
To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...
37 posted on
01/29/2004 5:22:37 AM PST by
Born Conservative
("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
To: Pokey78
Great article and can't wait for this book:
His Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House
38 posted on
01/29/2004 9:14:35 AM PST by
b4its2late
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why chance it?)
To: Pokey78
The harassment of Mr. Limbaugh provides another unlovely glimpse into the workings of the liberal elites.
I just love Bob Tyrrell's work. I've read all his books. However, I have to disagree with him here. Part of being a target of the left or right is to avoid giving them the rope to hang you. Clinton made that mistake and now Rush is. Can anyone say that an accusation of BREAKING the law is anyway less offensive than an accusation of lying under oath? Be true to the law and it will never let you down.
41 posted on
01/30/2004 7:41:14 AM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Over Here
42 posted on
02/01/2004 5:41:23 AM PST by
Rightly Biased
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/index_real.php" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: Pokey78
No one I have encountered claims he was taking the prescription medication OxyContin for kicks. Acording to those close to him, no one knew he was doing the drugs. How can they make a determination as to the reason, pain, recreation or both, if they didn't know of his use to begin with?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson