Skip to comments.
Zot!! 9 Reasons Conservatives Should Vote For Bush
Photo ^
| 1-28-04
Posted on 01/28/2004 11:17:09 AM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan
Edited on 01/28/2004 11:24:51 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator.
[history]
The nine candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination line up for a debate in Detroit. From left: the Rev. Al Sharpton; U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt, Mo., retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark; Sen. Joe Lieberman, Conn.; Sen. John Edwards, N.C.; U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Ohio; former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun; and Sen. John Kerry, Mass
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10acrebutt; albatross; bush; conservatism; drownedincoolaid; election2004; jaroftrollsouls; topten; trollsinmyshorts; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-249 next last
To: DMCA
The self professed purists are silly...I am NOT a Bush fan, but I KNOW that the alternative (democrats) is FAR WORSE, despite the childish claim by the third party gaggle that there is no difference.
To: Swanks
Amazing. Incredible. Stupendous. You've still offered nothing worthwhile on the thread.
82
posted on
01/28/2004 11:36:51 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: VRWCmember; KantianBurke
Gee, isn't Ann Coulter a pretty strong supporter of President Bush? Must be quite the dilemma our new friend has, huh? ROTFL!
83
posted on
01/28/2004 11:37:33 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: kidd
i think it would be interesting if the CP would allow candidates to get the nomination of both the GOP and the CP...sort of "I'm going to be part of a majority....but I am also a hard line conservative." Best of both?
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Okay, so there are things that are being done that irritate me. But I do like the man and for better or worse he's got my vote.
Educate me. Who should I vote for, if not Bush.
I don't get too concerned about programs passed by this or any other administration. They can and do get corrected. What I do get worried about is our judicial system and the life time appointments of judges. There is no quick fix for the harm that is done. Another 4 years may save us 50 years of social engineering through our courts.
85
posted on
01/28/2004 11:37:49 AM PST
by
fritzz
To: .cnI redruM
Great post...
...you BUSHBOT!! Hahaha, thanks.
86
posted on
01/28/2004 11:37:56 AM PST
by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: GoGoMax
I agree. Put his propaganda back up. It makes my post less amusing and that hurts my overburgoening ego ;(
87
posted on
01/28/2004 11:38:51 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Texas; more churches than any other state in the US!)
To: Johnny Gage
WOW! A "Twofer"!! Not only was Conservative Coulter Fan Zotted, but DMCA was too!
88
posted on
01/28/2004 11:39:09 AM PST
by
anoldafvet
(Democrats: Making the world safe for terrorists one lie at a time.)
To: .cnI redruM
THAT vs. 9 reasons?
C'mon, you gotta do better with a bush-basher.
89
posted on
01/28/2004 11:39:39 AM PST
by
eyespysomething
(Another American optimist!)
To: Impeach the Boy
When, and if, the Constitution Party ACTUALLY has a snow balls' chance in hell of winning, then, and ONLY then will it not be a vote for the democrat.When, and if, my single vote ACTUALLY has a snow balls' chance in hell of determining the outcome of the election, then, and ONLY then will a vote for the Constitution Party be a vote for the democrat.
To: Swanks
Better to cost them the WH and think long(er) term. Else each election cycle convervatives have no pwer and are taken for granted; equal to African-Americans on the Dem side. Horse dung. This kind of thinking gave us 8 years of derSchlickmeister, which ARGUABLY gave us the climate that gave Al Qaeda the boldness to committ the acts of 9/11.
No, whatever changes that ought to be made ought to be made while in power. Voting out the more conservative of the two electable parties is a big error.
91
posted on
01/28/2004 11:40:07 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: GoGoMax
This is frightening.... if we are only going to allow opinions that we agree with, than WTF are we doing here? Stroking our egos? I can excuse you for not realizing that the original document still exists under history (easy enough to miss), but silly comments like this one tell me you really don't know much at all about FR.
92
posted on
01/28/2004 11:40:35 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: mhking
Never the less - the censorship of the original post and responses is WRONG....
I have come here for years because of the free discussion in the absence of P.C. police. But apparently, liberals aren't the only ones afraid of free, open disscusion.
93
posted on
01/28/2004 11:41:24 AM PST
by
GoGoMax
(What the Hell?)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
is there any doubt that this forum is not about grassroots conservatism and more about republican party orthodoxy? Grassroots conservatives look at the list of accomplishments of this president (see post #6) that show pretty remarkable progress.
One of your points in your hyperbolic list accused the president of having a pro-abortion judge screening his judicial appointments, yet Bush's judicial nominees have been subjected to unprecedented smears and obstruction by the extreme pro-abortion wing of the democrat party (oh, that's pretty much all of the democrats in the senate these days).
Therefore, when somebody posts this kind of moronic drivel about this president, most grassroots conservatives will rally to the president's defense. Your suggestion that the forum is bound to "republican party orthodoxy" is pretty hollow. Most grassroots conservatives recognize where they will find the most support for most of the policies they would favor.
94
posted on
01/28/2004 11:41:35 AM PST
by
VRWCmember
(Dick Gephardt is a <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure </a>)
To: ConservativeDude
i think it would be interesting if the CP would allow candidates to get the nomination of both the GOP and the CPDoes the CP not allow that now?
To: ConservativeDude
That is interesting. You mean have the CP nominate Bush as THEIR POTUS candidate too? It would sort of be a national poll on what the GOP is composed of...perhaps it would send a message to the GOP that conservatives shouldn't be ignored.
96
posted on
01/28/2004 11:41:59 AM PST
by
kidd
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
WOW! A sleeper for 23 whole days. What amazing self-control.
97
posted on
01/28/2004 11:42:11 AM PST
by
Professional Engineer
(Then, Opportunity sends to Spirit, "Don't make me come around Mars to smack you")
To: Conservative Coulter Fan; Admin Moderator
Mod - Bring ACF back. I feel like you've interrupted my tee-ball session by depriving me of the tee.
98
posted on
01/28/2004 11:42:24 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Texas; more churches than any other state in the US!)
To: GoGoMax
I have come here for years So then I presume you were under another screen name for all those years? Or just a faithful lurker?
99
posted on
01/28/2004 11:42:55 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: finnman69
LOL
100
posted on
01/28/2004 11:43:25 AM PST
by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-249 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson