Skip to comments.
Official: Libyan nuclear material in U.S
cnn ^
| 27 Jan 2004
| Elise Labott
Posted on 01/27/2004 11:07:02 AM PST by demlosers
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A U.S plane filled with Libyan nuclear components landed this morning at a U.S. facility in Knoxville, Tennessee, for destruction, a senior administration official said.
"It is chock full of nuclear materials," the official said. "They let us take out some extraordinary stuff."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; US: Tennessee; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: curtweldon; disarmament; libya; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: Tricorn
What are the chances that Libya had surprising amounts of WMD, but Iraq had none? Seems incredible to me. Yes incredible. What WMDs Saddam had was easy to hide in the area the size of California.
21
posted on
01/27/2004 11:27:07 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: OXENinFLA
Jim Angle (FOX NEWS) just asked Scott McClellan Why are we bring this into the country. There was no real answer.My theory is so they can examine the components and determine just WHO helped Libya develop this stuff. Hello, France, Germany and Russia!
22
posted on
01/27/2004 11:28:35 AM PST
by
rintense
To: demlosers
I know that. Do you remember the stink made when just one shuttle mission would be carrying a small reactor for sattellite fuel? Something like a thimble full of nuclear fuel and the world was coming to an end if the shuttle had a mishap over the florida coast! They had experts warning us 24/7 over how risky it was to put all those people's lives in peril.
Of course flying one o dem big o'l birds chocked fullo nuclear weapons materials is just okeee-dokey?
23
posted on
01/27/2004 11:29:13 AM PST
by
blackdog
(Democrat Party? Democratic Party? Democrat Candidate? Democratic Candidate? Wassup wit dat?)
To: demlosers
I'll be damned. DEBKA predicted this 2 days ago.
This is the only time I know DEBKA to be right about anything. I am gobsmacked.
24
posted on
01/27/2004 11:29:38 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The Republicans have turned into Democrats, and the Democrats have turned into Marxists.)
To: demlosers
Gee, if the government wanted Lybian nuclear material, why didn't they just have the Mexicans carry over the southern border like all the Saudi terrorists do? If it's very heavy, the Mexican army (for a higher charge) will deliver it withing 10 miles of the border. Same with dope or illegals.
25
posted on
01/27/2004 11:30:38 AM PST
by
Tacis
To: demlosers
Well, it's obviously Bush's fault for deficit spending and I'll NEVER vote for HIM
26
posted on
01/27/2004 11:31:30 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: demlosers
Happiness is the Bush Doctrine.
We're witnessing the most brilliant foreign policy of our nation's brief history.
27
posted on
01/27/2004 11:32:33 AM PST
by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for Girls!)
To: demlosers
This story keeps using the phrase "nuclear materials"... does anyone know what the heck that's supposed to mean? I can't believe that we're talking about actual fissionable isotopes of uranium, or plutonium, or stuff like that. Surely there would be more hoopla in the media if that were the case...?
28
posted on
01/27/2004 11:32:44 AM PST
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: OXENinFLA
"Jim Angle (FOX NEWS) just asked Scott McClellan Why are we bring this into the country."Just what country would you prefer it go to? Or should it stay in Lybia? Maybe we should trust it to the dictator's club at the UN?
I wouldn't grace such a stupid question with an answer either.
29
posted on
01/27/2004 11:34:07 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: demlosers
Maybe this will stir up the "Lost nuclear bombs" burried in silt off the Charleston Coast panic.
I'd think if weapons inspectors are thin on work lately we might enlist their help in retrieving a few hundred megaton warheads out of Charleston Harbor.
I do not like the idea of flying nuclear bomb materials in partially assembled kit form like complex big wheels under the christmas tree into our airways.
30
posted on
01/27/2004 11:38:32 AM PST
by
blackdog
(Democrat Party? Democratic Party? Democrat Candidate? Democratic Candidate? Wassup wit dat?)
To: OXENinFLA
They took it to Oak Ridge National Laboratory ....
31
posted on
01/27/2004 11:39:23 AM PST
by
Dog
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our Country")
To: blackdog
Something like a thimble full of nuclear fuel and the world was coming to an end if the shuttle had a mishap over the florida coast! Just wait until the Bush's $3 billion Prometheus nuclear space program fruit begins to ripe, those Libs with be having cows. :)
32
posted on
01/27/2004 11:41:23 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Starve The Beast
"nuclear materials"... does anyone know what the heck that's supposed to mean? I can't believe that we're talking about actual fissionable isotopes of uranium, or plutonium, or stuff like that. Surely there would be more hoopla in the media if that were the case...?We don't know how far along Libya was in its nuke program...as for a media hoopla.....don't worry they are to busy worrying if NH will go to Kerry or not.
33
posted on
01/27/2004 11:42:15 AM PST
by
Dog
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our Country")
To: cake_crumb
It wasn't stupid. Fox news has to broadcast to the lowest common denominator, and it gives Angle a chance to explain just how tedious the destruction is, and why it can't just be done out in the Libyan desert somewhere. In fact, its a darn good question, because if it isn't properly explained, it will become part of the left's conspiracy BS. Although it probably already has. Still, the best weapon against spin is the Truth. Get the Truth out there first, IMO.
To: demlosers
Remember that guy in the Australian outback that covered his Airstream mobile home with thousands of pillows during Skylab's re-entry? Even the ones he strapped onto his dog?
35
posted on
01/27/2004 11:46:14 AM PST
by
blackdog
(Democrat Party? Democratic Party? Democrat Candidate? Democratic Candidate? Wassup wit dat?)
To: blackdog
LOL!
36
posted on
01/27/2004 11:47:28 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Cobra Scott
I would be very curious to hear if some French or German scientific delegation is asking to have a conference at Oak Ridge anytime soon?
"OK, Do any of you frenchy frogs know who's nuclear trigger this is?"
"I've got seven dozen precision machined warhead casings here. They are machined to within .0002 thousandths. Hey Fritz, are you sure these are not yours?"
37
posted on
01/27/2004 11:53:31 AM PST
by
blackdog
(Democrat Party? Democratic Party? Democrat Candidate? Democratic Candidate? Wassup wit dat?)
To: blackdog
LOL!
38
posted on
01/27/2004 11:55:25 AM PST
by
Dog
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our Country")
To: blackdog
>>Of course flying one o dem big o'l birds chocked fullo nuclear weapons materials is just okeee-dokey?
B-52s did it all the time for 30+ years.
39
posted on
01/27/2004 11:56:40 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank)
To: smith288
Bingo, LIbya is the answer to all the liberal baiting about 'Where are the Iraq WMD's?'
Ask those foaming idiots if Libya would have ended its WMD program if we hadn't gone to war in Iraq. When they say 'yes', then ask them if they are aware that Libya didn't initiate contact with Britian about ending their WMD program until the day the Iraq war started.
That should shut them up, temporarily.
40
posted on
01/27/2004 11:56:54 AM PST
by
Diddle E. Squat
(www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson