Bush-Bashing Conservatives Should Focus on the Big Picture

GOPUSA.com ^ | Januray.26,2004 | Bobby Eberle

[MEG33]

I believe what this article says.I also believe we should hold our represenatatives feet to the fire on Pork.

[Sabertooth]

Why do we have to focus on only one picture?

I want to reelect Bush and see his Amnesty defeated.

Is that wrong?

[Reagan Man]

>>>The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

Almost the exact same words I posted the other day.

What are the alternatives? John Kerry. Howard Dean. John Edwards. Wes Clark. Or maybe Harry Browne. Howard Philips. John Hagelin. Hmmm.

Need I remind the perpetually pissed off faction of the political rightwing, America is at war. The President and his administration have done a remarkable job in handling the aftermath of 9-11, prosecuting the war on terrorism and stimulating the economy out of recession.

Protest votes aren't the answer in 2004. Bush and Company deserve reelection. There are no viable alternatives for conservatives.

[JoeGar]

The conservative movement needs a voice, and it needs a leader.

Damn right. Bush is the only candidate who can get steroids out of professional sports. That's at least as important as putting a man on Mars.

[Aeronaut]

The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

What scares me more than a democrat president is a democrat commander-in-chief.

[Sabertooth]

Conservative Bashing Bush Should Focus on the Big Picture.

Yeoooowwwww!

That left a mark. Tagline material.

[Uncle Miltie]

"Bush-Bashing Conservatives Should Focus on the Big Picture"

I am, I am!

$2,000,000,000,000.00

The Medicare Drug Entitlement is a VERY BIG PICTURE.

My part of that is about $40,000, or about two years more work before retirement. I get it. Republicans are now stealing my life.

[Reagan Man]

>>>I want to reelect Bush and see his Amnesty defeated.
Is that wrong?

Nope. Legitimate criticism is fine, in my book.

But people need to keep their eye on the prize.

The priority is to reelect PresBush.

[ex-snook]

Hey not a great positive campaign theme. "Vote for me, the other guy is worse".

[Uncle Miltie]

Whitewash Alert!

Does not discuss the largest new entitlement since LBJ.

Eyewash Alert!

[kingu]

If you write Tancredo's name, make sure your state will count the number of ballots with that name. Otherwise, you're just giving long term employment to ballot counters for nothing.

[Sloth]

Hey not a great positive campaign theme. "Vote for me, the other guy is worse".

I agree. The DemonRats are using the same slogan.

[MEG33]

Many in the military and their families want Bush as their CIC and consider it very important that he be elected.

[Ronin]

Ditto. Let's face it, Bush was not my first candidate for election back in 2004, but when he got the nomination, I threw my support behind him because a protest vote for any other candidate was/is a de-facto vote for Gore.

I am not happy with his immigration plan, although I have not studied it enough to say concretely it sucks-bones throughout, and I am depressed with the new prescription drug program...

The fact it, there have been a number of things that Bush has done that has irked the Hell out of me, but all that needs to be considered in light of what "would have been" if Al Gore had been elected.

We have the same choice now. There is no alternative to Bush that is not a hundred times worse. That being the case, I will grit my teeth, hold my nose -- and vote for him. (I don't expect to like it much when I do.)

[Eva]

I agree with you almost completely, I would change liberalism to leftism. The Democrats are not liberals. They are leftist haters, without a shred of compassion except to exploit the issues of minorities and special interest groups.

[skip2myloo]

This guy has been reading my posts here all week.

[Sabertooth]

Nope. Legitimate criticism is fine, in my book.

Fair enough.

I just need to throw this link in here...

On "Bushbots" and "Bushbashers"

[Mo1]

The answer to this question is simple: conservatives must wake up and smell the coffee. The best choice for conservatives; the best candidate to advance our agenda; and the best person in which to put our hope and faith is President George W. Bush.

Excellent Article!!

[MeekOneGOP]

Of course, the poll is meaningless in the sense that President Bush has not yet begun to campaign, but it does add fuel to the fire that 2004 could be as close as the historic elections of 2000. With that in mind, it's time for conservatives across the country to focus on the big picture and realize that a Bush loss is far worse than a Bush victory.

I think too many folks here don't understand this.
NONE of the 'RAT candidates are worth their weigh in horse manure ! ...

[fly_so_free]

"Bush bashing conservatives should look at the big picture"

Ha!- not likely to happen anytime soon. The bashers don't see the threat of the democrats as that big of a deal. They think the country can survive another democrat presidency.

"Stroke of the pen , law of the land,-neat huh?"
president Bill Clinton

This means nothing to the BB's and they are willing to risk turning our military over to the 'RATS.
UH-UH- There is NO WAY, I want that to happen-NO WAY/ NO HOW. But convincing the BB's is like talking to a brick wall.